Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Denis, Yes, we have the main issue for NN introduction. The first implementation of NN for 2.4 release will be a MLP( multilayer perceptron ), with sub task - local implemeatation of MLP <

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Yuri, Do you aggregate NN tasks somehow in JIRA? Want to learn more on what’s going there. — Denis > On Dec 21, 2017, at 1:39 AM, Yury Babak wrote: > > Hi Denis, > > as for ML - we on track. For this release we have FCM, Decision tree, KNN, > Model/Trainer API, Neural Network introduction an

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi Denis, as for ML - we on track. For this release we have FCM, Decision tree, KNN, Model/Trainer API, Neural Network introduction and bunch of improvements and bugfixes. Also we slightly change our plan for NN. In this release we will add distributed(and local) MLP(multilayer perceptron) instea

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi, Denis. Yes, we collaborated with Yuri and are currently waiting for Ignite Tests run results (though I’ll be able to start full comparison run only on weekend because of extremely high TC load) to be sure that 1) I did not break overall build and 2) building and testing on Java 8 produces

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Please ping me or file a ticket following these rules [1] when this happens so that I could update this documentation page: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-metrics [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Document — Denis > On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Andrey Ku

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Thanks, Denis! I hope I'll finish the task on memory metrics in a couple of days. 2017-12-20 23:28 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda : > Andrey K., excellent progress! Do you think you will finish the task by > the end of the year? > > Furthermore, I see you are working on Java 9 specific tasks: > https://i

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Andrey K., excellent progress! Do you think you will finish the task by the end of the year? Furthermore, I see you are working on Java 9 specific tasks: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6728 Is everything alright there? If you nee

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi Peter, Sorry for confusion, yes, I meant using Java 8 by default in Ignite. Labeled the Java 8 ticket with “important” and now it appears in the required tickets list: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.4#ApacheIgnite2.4-RequiredTickets As I see Yuri reviewed

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi Denis, As for memory metrics, I'm fixing minor bugs now, and then we'll need some time for review. 2017-12-19 23:07 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda : > Igniters, > > It’s time to sync up on the progress of IMPORTANT tasks for 2.4: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.4#

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi, Denis! What about switching to Java 8 by default? [1] I guess this task is inseparably connected to Java 7 support drop and Java 9 support introducing. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7203 > On 19 Dec 2017, at 23:07, Denis Magda wrote: > > Igniters, > > It’s time to

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hello, Denis > - Nikolay Izhikov: Data Frames. I'm waiting for Valentin Kulichenko review. If and when further comments for DataFrame pull request appears I will fix them immediately. В Вт, 19/12/2017 в 12:07 -0800, Denis Magda пишет: > Igniters, > > It’s time to sync up on the progress of IMPO

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Igniters, It’s time to sync up on the progress of IMPORTANT tasks for 2.4: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.4#ApacheIgnite2.4-RequiredTickets How good are we

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi, I've just updated the issue. Please take a look. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Andrey Gura wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on WAL optimizations that improve performance >> significantly [1]. I believe it's important task and sho

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi Denis, I've been working on SSL support for ODBC [1] for a while now, and I hope to include it in 2.4, as well as some other minor improvements and bug fixes for ODBC. [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6810 Best Regards, Igor On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:51 AM, vveider wrote:

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi, Denis. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7107 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7108 -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi, I suggest to include Andrey's change with WAL standalone thread, this will speed up Ignite at least because CRC calcs goes to user threads instead of one writer thread. This brings also resistence to thread interrupt and other benefits. Change, which I'm currently working on, is a direct IO h

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi, As for ML - so far so good and from my point of view all mentioned tasks will be completed in this release. Regards, Yury -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Andrey Gura wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on WAL optimizations that improve performance > significantly [1]. I believe it's important task and should be > included in Apache Ignite 2.4 release. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6339 > > Andrey, I

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Hi, I'm working on WAL optimizations that improve performance significantly [1]. I believe it's important task and should be included in Apache Ignite 2.4 release. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6339 On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > Igniters, > > Basing on

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

1) Thin Client Connector (server part) and .NET Thin Client are in master and ready for release. See `thin client` component in JIRA. 2) .NET Core cross-platform support (Ignite.NET on Linux and macOS) also are in master and ready: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2662 https://issues.a

Re: Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

First part of Spark dataframe integration is likely to get into 2.4: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3084 -Val On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Igniters, > > Basing on the amount of improvements, fixes and features stacked in the > master branch I think it’s a r

Time and scope for Apache Ignite 2.4

Igniters, Basing on the amount of improvements, fixes and features stacked in the master branch I think it’s a right time to negotiate the scope and time of the next Apache Ignite 2.4 release. I’m ready to step in as a release manager if none of the committers wants to try on this role. Here i