Re: UBSAN in pre-merge testing

2018-11-12 Thread Jim Apple
My only concern with this is the unfinished nature of the UBSAN work. Here are some things left to do: 1. Make UBSAN builds work with FE and JDBC tests. These aren't UBSAN unclean -- they plain don't work. 2. Make e2e, custom cluster, and BE tests UBSAN clean. This is in progress. 3. Make e2e

Re: UBSAN in pre-merge testing

2018-11-12 Thread Philip Zeyliger
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:21 PM Jim Apple wrote: > I don't think I understand the "one stone" part - are you suggesting that > we do UBSAN testing within a centos6 container? > Exactly. If we're doing multiple builds, we may as well be mutating other variables to get coverage from them. (Here,

Re: UBSAN in pre-merge testing

2018-11-12 Thread Jim Apple
I don't think I understand the "one stone" part - are you suggesting that we do UBSAN testing within a centos6 container? On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:01 PM Philip Zeyliger wrote: > Seems useful to me. > > If you're interested, we could kill multiple birds with one stone. > Specifically, I'm also

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.0 release

2018-11-12 Thread Alexandra Rodoni
I think about 7 working days will be enough to wrap up the doc work for 3.1: - TOPN query option - SHUTDOWN command - TIMEZONE changes - Minor release-related work On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Zoltan Borok-Nagy wrote: > Hey Folks, > > It's been a week since we last talked about the 3.1.0

Re: UBSAN in pre-merge testing

2018-11-12 Thread Philip Zeyliger
Seems useful to me. If you're interested, we could kill multiple birds with one stone. Specifically, I'm also interested in centos6/rh6 pre-merge testing. There are a variety of ways to do so, including running with test-with-docker stuff. I recognize it's more work, but happy to help if you want