The multithreading effort is still ongoing. Joins, in particular, are not
executed with multiple threads yet.
Not sure if I completely followed your last two questions, please correct
me if I misunderstood.
The general idea of the multithreading effort is to start multiple fragment
instances per
Hi,
Looks like you are joining store_sales with catalog_sales on item_sk, this
kind of join condition is a many to many, which means the output number of
rows will be much larger then input number of rows, not sure if this is
intended.
Also did you run "compute stats [TABLE_NAME]" on both
The profile file is damaged. Here is a screenshot for exec summary
2017-10-27 10:04 GMT+08:00 俊杰陈 :
> Hi Devs
>
> I met a performance issue on big table join. The query takes more than 3
> hours on Impala and only 3 minutes on Spark SQL on the same 5 nodes
> cluster. when
Hi Devs
I met a performance issue on big table join. The query takes more than 3
hours on Impala and only 3 minutes on Spark SQL on the same 5 nodes
cluster. when running query, the left scanner and exchange node are very
slow. Did I miss some key arguments?
you can see profile file in
I think the actual failure was this:
*16:13:18* + grep ']' /home/ubuntu/tidylog.txt*16:13:18*
/home/ubuntu/Impala/be/src/rpc/thrift-server-test.cc:105:26: warning:
extra ';' after member function definition
[clang-diagnostic-extra-semi]*16:13:18*
At the bottom of
https://jenkins.impala.io/job/clang-tidy-ub1604/78/consoleFull I see:
*16:05:31* + bin/run_clang_tidy.sh*16:13:18* + grep ']'
/home/ubuntu/tidylog.txt*16:13:18*
/home/ubuntu/Impala/be/src/rpc/thrift-server-test.cc:105:26: warning:
extra ';' after member function definition
Does anyone know the cause for this failure in the clang-tidy run in GVO?
It's something to do with hadoop-lzo.
https://jenkins.impala.io/job/clang-tidy-ub1604/78/consoleFull
*15:52:44* [javadoc] Generating
/home/ubuntu/hadoop-lzo/build/docs/api/help-doc.html...*15:52:44*
[javadoc] 1
Thanks Tim, for the update.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Tim Armstrong
wrote:
> It looks like tests are more stable for me now so I think we can continue
> merging changes. Please put in as much effort as reasonable to make sure
> that your changes don't add to test
Hi Bruno,
Could you provide an example of the specific predicates that aren't being
used to successfully skip the row group?
- Tim
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Jeszy wrote:
> Hello Bruno,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. While not apparent from the commit
> comments,
It looks like tests are more stable for me now so I think we can continue
merging changes. Please put in as much effort as reasonable to make sure
that your changes don't add to test flakiness.
- Tim
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Tim Armstrong
wrote:
> A few recent
If you'd like to contribute a patch to Impala, but aren't sure what you
want to work on, you can look at Impala's newbie issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12341668. You can find
detailed instructions on submitting patches at
11 matches
Mail list logo