I suspect we can consider this a positive vote, as a result does it make sense to move on to the general@incubator vote?
On 2018/01/04 17:49:43, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but that's > > not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or not) is a > > consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot have more active > > oversight than active contributors. > > > > Unfortunately contributions were limited to mostly 2 people and even those > > were in bursts. A release of something useful to a larger audience was > > constantly delayed. We all agree that the execution did not follow the > > vision and the interest expressed is not backed up by contributions. > > > > I do not see any reason to delay the move to attic, even by a few days. > > > > Hadrian > > > > On 01/04/2018 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right? > >> > >> While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project > >> I don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I > >> have some doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the > >> project. > >> > >> Lets give it a few days and see if anyone else says anything and if not > >> then hold a vote there. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Justin > >> > >> > > > -- > Thanks, > > Gunnar > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* >
