Re: [Discussion] Unify metrics system with rest api.

By the way, I prefer jersey + jetty than spring MVC + tomcat Because jetty is more light and embedded. Do you have any other suggestions? On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:30 AM Boris Zhu wrote: > I will implement the rest APIs for IoTDB by using jetty. I want to move > all web resources into an

Re: [Discussion] Unify metrics system with rest api.

+1 for rest API. If you have already finished the API documentation, you can share it with the community. Something like Swagger is also recommended. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Lukas Ott 于2020年2月5日周三

Re: [Discussion] Unify metrics system with rest api.

+1 for that. Sounds great! Boris Zhu schrieb am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020, 02:30: > I will implement the rest APIs for IoTDB by using jetty. I want to move all > web resources into an independent package and the rest APIs make web > development easier. >

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-457) Remove the constrains of Fill clause

Jialin Qiao created IOTDB-457: - Summary: Remove the constrains of Fill clause Key: IOTDB-457 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-457 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-455) Fix the default Fill function for different datatypes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-455. - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.8.2) (was: 0.8.1) (was: 0.9.1)

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-455) Fix the default Fill function for different datatypes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17030340#comment-17030340 ] Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-455: --- Hi, I have fixed this bug in the new_series_reader branch. The

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-455) Fix the default Fill function for different datatypes

Jialin Qiao created IOTDB-455: - Summary: Fix the default Fill function for different datatypes Key: IOTDB-455 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-455 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome two new committers: Jincheng Sun and Haonan Hou

Thanks Xiangdong and Jincheng, I’m also very happy to become a committer. Looking forward to contributing more to the community. Congratulations Jincheng too! Best, Haonan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome two new committers: Jincheng Sun and Haonan Hou

Thanks Xiangdong, Really happy to be onboard! It is really a pleasure working with you and the community. Congratulations Haonan! Best, Jincheng Xiangdong Huang 于2020年2月5日周三 上午9:00写道： > Hi folks, > > In January, two contributors became IoTDB's new committer: Jincheng Sun and > Haonan Hou. >

[Discussion] Unify metrics system with rest api.

I will implement the rest APIs for IoTDB by using jetty. I want to move all web resources into an independent package and the rest APIs make web development easier.

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-454) Vectorize the TimeGenerator

Jialin Qiao created IOTDB-454: - Summary: Vectorize the TimeGenerator Key: IOTDB-454 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-454 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-453) Parallel the alignment of timestamp in raw data query

Jialin Qiao created IOTDB-453: - Summary: Parallel the alignment of timestamp in raw data query Key: IOTDB-453 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-453 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue

[ANNOUNCE] Welcome two new committers: Jincheng Sun and Haonan Hou

Hi folks, In January, two contributors became IoTDB's new committer: Jincheng Sun and Haonan Hou. They are our 29th and 30th committers. Jincheng Sun made effort to the community building, contains the JIRA management, website info etc.. Jincheng is also one of Apache Flink PMCs, which make

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-335) Separate query executions of the same timeseries with different aggregate functions may be optimized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17029874#comment-17029874 ] Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-335: --- This is the aggregation query. 452 is the group by query >

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-452) Do all aggregations of one series at one pass in GroupBy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17029818#comment-17029818 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-452: --- I see.  Make sense. > Do all aggregations of one series at

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-452) Do all aggregations of one series at one pass in GroupBy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17029814#comment-17029814 ] Zesong Sun commented on IOTDB-452: -- Hi [~hxd], aggregations without group by clause is implemented in

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-335) Separate query executions of the same timeseries with different aggregate functions may be optimized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17029807#comment-17029807 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-335: --- Hi, what is the difference with  IOTDB-452? > Separate

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-452) Do all aggregations of one series at one pass in GroupBy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17029806#comment-17029806 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-452: --- +1 .  It is a basic optimization for the query process.

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-335) Separate query executions of the same timeseries with different aggregate functions may be optimized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-335. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Separate query executions of the same

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-451) [Distributed]Recovery of snapshot pulling

Tian Jiang created IOTDB-451: Summary: [Distributed]Recovery of snapshot pulling Key: IOTDB-451 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-451 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Improvement