Re: Karaf features

2020-03-02 Thread Robinet, Etienne
Hi Julian, hi Hialin, I managed to make the JDBC a bundle, still trying to fine-tune to create a feature (first time doing this kind of stuff). I will open a Jira Issue today. What I will also do is create an implementation to use IoTDB as DataSource in Karaf (as I will work with camel inside

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - March 2020

2020-03-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Thanks. I have signed off on the report. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 7:45 PM Xiangdong Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I have written a draft for this

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - March 2020

2020-03-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
You aren't late. This was the initial reminder. Please go ahead and discuss the report with your PPMC and then add it to wiki. It looks good so far to me. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail -

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-529) Relative times and NOW() operator cannot be used in Group By

2020-03-02 Thread Jialin Qiao (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-529. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Relative times and NOW() operator cannot be

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-527) SeriesReader bug when mergeReader has data and overlappedPageReaders isEmpty

2020-03-02 Thread Jialin Qiao (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-527. - Resolution: Fixed > SeriesReader bug when mergeReader has data and overlappedPageReaders isEmpty >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-298) Last time-value query

2020-03-02 Thread Jialin Qiao (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-298. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Last time-value query > - >

Re: Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, I did not fully test it, swichted to 0.9.1 then : ) But, I will have another look. As discussed with Xiangdong I'm currently working on an extension to automatically do group by if time range is too large, see discussion here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528. But I think it

Re: Karaf features

2020-03-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Etienne, nice to see you active on many lists __ Indeed it would make sense to open a Jira. I think it should be pretty easy and straightforward to make the JDBC Driver a bundle and then we could also easily provide a Karaf feature for it, IMHO. Julian Am 02.03.20, 16:41 schrieb "Jialin

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-535) Do we need a more accurate data type in the ResultSet for aggregation functions

2020-03-02 Thread Julian Feinauer (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17049464#comment-17049464 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-535: --- I would like that. A straightforwad solution would be to

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-535) Do we need a more accurate data type in the ResultSet for aggregation functions

2020-03-02 Thread Xiangdong Huang (Jira)
Xiangdong Huang created IOTDB-535: - Summary: Do we need a more accurate data type in the ResultSet for aggregation functions Key: IOTDB-535 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-535

Re: Karaf features

2020-03-02 Thread Jialin Qiao
Hi Etienne, There isn't an integration with karaf now and we do not have a plan yet. You could create an issue in jira :) https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/IOTDB/issues/IOTDB-376?filter=allopenissues Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 >

Re: Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Xiangdong Huang
Hi Julian and Jialin, I have merged PR #865, and now it works on master branch. Jialin, I will close your PR as it is duplicated with #865. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Xiangdong Huang 于2020年3月2日周一

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-376) Metric module is not enabled when calling executeQueryStatement()

2020-03-02 Thread Jialin Qiao (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-376. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Metric module is not enabled when calling

Re: Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Xiangdong Huang
Hi Jialin, Julian has fixed the bug in https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/865 So is this the only issue? Have you tested the connector? Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Jialin Qiao 于2020年3月2日周一

Karaf features

2020-03-02 Thread Etienne Robinet
Hello, I am pretty new looking into IoTDB and I wanted to ask if there was any karaf feature/integration for the jdbc driver?(Or any planned). Regards, Etienne

Re: Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Boris Zhu
I will develop a new grafana plugin after rest API. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:16 PM Jialin Qiao wrote: > Hi Julian, > > It seems that the line 89 in BasicDaoImpl.java > > statement.execute("show timeseries" + "root *"); > > should be > > statement.execute("show timeseries"); > > I have submitted

Re: Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Jialin Qiao
Hi Julian, It seems that the line 89 in BasicDaoImpl.java statement.execute("show timeseries" + "root *"); should be statement.execute("show timeseries"); I have submitted a pr: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/870 Please have a check :) Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of

Re: Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Jialin, building isnt the issue, it just don’t works feature wise : ) There are errors in the queries so it don’t shows data in Grafana. Sorry, I was unclear about that. Julian Am 02.03.20, 13:33 schrieb "Jialin Qiao" : Hi Julian, I could execute "mvn clean package

Re: Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Jialin Qiao
Hi Julian, I could execute "mvn clean package -DskipTests" successfully including grafana. What's the error for grafana integration you meet? Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2020-03-02 17:55:37

Grafana Integration currently broken?

2020-03-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, I just played around a bit with IoTDB-Grafana integration the last days and it seems that it works in 0.9.0 and 0.9.1 but is broken in the current master. It seems like the query there is not valid. I guess some refactoring was done but not properly tested. Is anyone working on that

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-439) [Distributed] Incorrect Snapshot implementation and LogManager

2020-03-02 Thread Tian Jiang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tian Jiang closed IOTDB-439. Resolution: Fixed > [Distributed] Incorrect Snapshot implementation and LogManager >

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-534) [Distributed] Query coordinating

2020-03-02 Thread Tian Jiang (Jira)
Tian Jiang created IOTDB-534: Summary: [Distributed] Query coordinating Key: IOTDB-534 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-534 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Improvement