Re: AW: [DISCUSS] I would like to propose using Spotless for IoTDB coding style check

2021-02-17 Thread jincheng sun
The difference is between `/**` and `/*`, i.e., we have very strict control on javadoc annotation, and multi line annotation will be more flexible. Xiangdong Huang 于2021年2月17日周三 下午9:40写道: > Hi, > > why moving comments ahead of a class into the inside of the class can > avoid that? > >

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] I would like to propose using Spotless for IoTDB coding style check

2021-02-17 Thread Xiangdong Huang
Hi, why moving comments ahead of a class into the inside of the class can avoid that? --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 jincheng sun 于2021年2月17日周三 下午6:21写道: > Thank you for your positive feedback, Dawei ! > > #1: May

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] I would like to propose using Spotless for IoTDB coding style check

2021-02-17 Thread jincheng sun
Thank you for your positive feedback, Dawei ! #1: May be we can turn special class comments into multiline comments for ensure example readability. more detail can be find [1]. #2: We can fix the incorrect license headers, i.e., `/**` to `/*` in license header. It would be great if you have time