Re: Support new path pattern: 0 or more layers

2022-06-21 Thread Eric Pai
I think we may meet the requirements of matching 0-1 level in the future, then *** may be not a good design. As a single * stands for exactly 1 level now, we can define *{start, end} to [start, end) levels, {x} to exactly x levels and {*} to arbitrary levels, where ** is just a short

Re: Support new path pattern: 0 or more layers

2022-06-21 Thread Xiangdong Huang
Hi, - if only for 0 or more layers, I opt for *** - if we want to define a clear range of layers, I opt for *{start, end} or **{start, end} --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 guoguan...@qq.com.INVALID 于2022年6月21日周二