Hi Chris,
Look forward! SBOM has also received a lot of attention in China.
Which kind of format/standard it will obey?
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
Christofer Dutz 于2023年7月14日周五 21:28写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> here in Europe we’re currently preparing for quite a bit of a
+1, too.
---
Xiangdong Huang
Jialin Qiao 于2023年7月14日周五 21:30写道：
>
> +1 for cleaning it
> —
> Jialin Qiao
> Apache IoTDB PMC
>
> Yuan Tian 于2023年7月14日周五 21:28写道：
> >
> > Sure! Do as you want! We would love to see these refactoring prs.
> >
> >
> >
+1 for renaming.
BTW, seems IoTDB's sonar setting has some errors that test code
coverage can not be catched.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Yuan Tian 于2023年7月15日周六 09:50写道：
>
> We would like to see that for su
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'IoTDB/IoTDB-pip-new/master [master] [288]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/IoTDB/job/IoTDB-pip-new/job/master/288/";>IoTDB/IoTDB-pip-new/master
[master] [288]"
We would like to see that for sure.
Best,
--
Yuan Tian
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:13 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> We have to file a Jira ticket for Infra … but wanted to know, if it would be
> ok for you folks for me to do that.
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Yuan Tian
> Datum: Freitag, 14.
We have to file a Jira ticket for Infra … but wanted to know, if it would be ok
for you folks for me to do that.
Chris
Von: Yuan Tian
Datum: Freitag, 14. Juli 2023 um 15:40
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Setup Sonarcloud for IoTDB?
Aha, that's right. Do you know how to change
Aha, that's right. Do you know how to change that name? I didn't find
where to change that name before.
Best,
Yuan Tian
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:31 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> Hehe … ok … so because of the “incubator” in there, I didn’t find it ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Jialin
Hi all,
Any objections to rename the project from “incubator-iotdb” to “iotdb”?
It seems that we’d need to file an infra ticket and they’d rename it for us.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Datum: Freitag, 14. Juli 2023 um 15:34
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Setup Sonarcloud for Io
So, we’re currently running it in GitHub Actions?
In PLC4X we’re running it as part of our Jenkins build.
But I guess there too it’s only for committers … but that makes sense as I
think even running it on multiple branches would mix up the results, right?
Chris
Von: Jialin Qiao
Datum: Freitag,
Hehe … ok … so because of the “incubator” in there, I didn’t find it ;-)
Chris
Von: Jialin Qiao
Datum: Freitag, 14. Juli 2023 um 15:29
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Setup Sonarcloud for IoTDB?
Hi,
We have the sonar cloud:
https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=apache_incu
+1 for cleaning it
—
Jialin Qiao
Apache IoTDB PMC
Yuan Tian 于2023年7月14日周五 21:28写道：
>
> Sure! Do as you want! We would love to see these refactoring prs.
>
>
> Best,
> --
> Yuan Tian
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:20 PM Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
> >
> > Aaah cool,
>
Hi,
We have the sonar cloud:
https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=apache_incubator-iotdb
But it is only for committers: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/10548
Thanks,
—
Jialin Qiao
Apache IoTDB PMC
Christofer Dutz 于2023年7月14日周五 21:24写道：
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I just had a lo
Sure! Do as you want! We would love to see these refactoring prs.
Best,
--
Yuan Tian
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:20 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> Aaah cool,
>
> and sorry for asking so much … much of IoTDBs history is not recorded and I’m
> just starting to get my hands dirty.
>
Hi all,
here in Europe we’re currently preparing for quite a bit of an earthquake
caused by the Cyber-Resiliency-Act. In some projects I’m involved in (Mainly
PLC4X) I’ve started initiating small changes which could make us come out
without too many problems.
One thing that seems to be coming
Hi folks,
I just had a look and noticed that we currently don’t have Sonarcloud analysis
setup.
At apache we have free access to using it for open-soucre and I’d like to
suggest to start using it. Some of the things it reports are definitely going
to be false positives, but it also spots a lot
Aaah cool,
and sorry for asking so much … much of IoTDBs history is not recorded and I’m
just starting to get my hands dirty.
I am afraid, that I’ll probably have more questions like this as they come up.
But that means, if I see something that can be refactored quickly, I can create
PRs for st
Hi Chris,
Actually, most of the existing Singleton pattern Class is just for
simplifying things during development. And we did run into trouble
when writing some UTs(In such case, I will change related Singleton
pattern Class ).
But there are always higher priority tasks, so there is no time to
c
Hi all,
as I’m digging into IoTDB more and more, I noticed a quite excessive usage of
the Singleton pattern … some times even for things where it doesn’t really make
much sense. For example in SystemFileFactory, the methods don’t really have
much state and simply fire RuntimeExceptions if fsTyp
Ok … so having had a look, it seems as if this happens in the
UDFExecutableManager
Class (And the matching other Manager components. The “SystemFileFactory
.makeDirIfNecessary” are the ones creating them.
Possibly worth investigating if they really need to exist, of if we could
change the Manager
> I can imagine what it’s used for … I was more just asking, why it’s creating
> these directories locally instead of just looking if they exist. Always feels
> a bit odd, if loads of empty directories are in my filesystem.
agree with that feeling... this can be indeed an improvement if it
does
20 matches
Mail list logo
