,
---
Sijia Li
-邮件原件-
发件人: Xiangdong Huang
发送时间: 2022年5月17日 8:57
收件人: dev
主题:Re: About replacing byteBuffer
If we introduce Netty, data copy when scaling a bytebuf is not what we want.
Can we use compositeByteBuf to replace it and meanwhile enjoy the benefit of
pooledByteBuf
If we introduce Netty, data copy when scaling a bytebuf is not what we
want.
Can we use compositeByteBuf to replace it and meanwhile enjoy the benefit
of pooledByteBuf?
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Jialin Qiao
Hi,
The serialization interface needs to be refactored afterward.
Before that, using ByteArrayOutputStream is easier.
Thanks,
—
Jialin Qiao
Apache IoTDB PMC
李思佳 于2022年5月16日周一 11:44写道：
> Hi all,
>
> When I was developing the snapshot interface for the configNode module, I
>
Hi all,
When I was developing the snapshot interface for the configNode module, I
noticed that the parameters received by the serialization interface were all
defined as ByteBuffer, which seemed to have some problems. For example, the
external main process has no way of knowing how big the
