Hi zq,
It is appreciated that you did some research on the two PRs, which is
very helpful for a developer.
I have to say I had no intention to offend your code quality in my
last email (I just want to claim the principle to the whole
community)... I apologize for that if some words gave you the
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback of this contribution! I support to give more
attention for each PR and do more communication.
Besides, if you have a PR need to be reviewed or just want to do a
modification, welcome to discuss in the mail list.
Thanks,
—
Jialin Qiao
Apache IoTDB PMC
After reading PR#11429, upon comparing my PR, it does have more advantageous
aspects from which I have greatly benefited. However, I need to point out
something that I find 'unfair' in the process.
First of all, my PR was committed on Oct 12, 2023, and no one followed up on it
before I asked.
well,I am very willing to learn more in the new PR，I've recently begun using
IoTDB, and I'm truly sorry for any inconvenience caused due to my lack of
familiarity with open-source projects as it's my first time participating.
However, IoTDB has indeed played a significant role in my project.
Hi,
I read the discussion and all related issues/pull requests, and give
some of my comments:
It is appreciated for cqzhang's contribution to iotdb, especially for
the detailed bug feedback. This is the best contribution to the open
source community.
Being a TLP open source project of Apache
Dear all,
I am writing to share my experiences and concerns regarding my contributions to
IoTDB. I appreciate your time in reading this and hope that my feedback will be
taken constructively.
Here is my experience when submitting pr to apache IoTDB:
On 2023/09/13, I used iotdb at work and
