AW: Homepage fix

y 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月22日周四 上午12:24写道： > Just a short addition: > I copied from the flink site the following statement (which should > suffice), regarding the hash verification: > > > Verifying Hashes and Signatures > > Along with our releases, we also

Re: Homepage fix

Software Foundation has an extensive tutorial to verify hashes and signatures which you can follow by using any of these release-signing KEYS. Am 21.08.19, 18:22 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hey, I got some further requests to fix which we should address before the ann

Re: Homepage fix

. The download page needs say that downloaders should verify releases, and describe how to do so using KEYS + sig, or hash. === Thanks! Julian Am 21.08.19, 15:28 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, thanks fort he fast fix, I already resend the ANNOUNCE mail.. so

FW: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

Yay, we are in both Cons : ) Julian Am 20.08.19, 23:47 schrieb "Roman Shaposhnik" : Hi All! thanks a million for this tremendous interest in Podling's Shark Tank. We now have: ApacheCON NA in Las Vegas: Daffodil ShardingSphere Heron

Re: [Discuss] how to organize PRs (for fixing bugs) to the next version or v0.8.1?

Hi, I agree with Willem. PRs should generally go to master (develop, see discussion below). If we discuss that one Patch is so important that we want to create a "hotfix" release than we will pick it to the "rel/0.8" branch and do a new release there (tagget then 'release/0.8.1' for example).

Re: Homepage fix

t. Please review PR > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb-website/pull/30 > Or I will merge it a short time later. > > Best, > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东

Re: [DISCUSS] Any idea for the Apache IoTDB talk on Apache Con NA 2019?

perhaps show how it relates to parquet and others). Julian Von: Xiangdong Huang Datum: Mittwoch, 21. August 2019 um 15:20 An: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" , Julian Feinauer , 乔嘉林 <646274...@qq.com>, 刘睿 <245422...@qq.com>, "qingxin.f...@hotmail.com" , "xingtan...@apa

Homepage fix

Hi, Just got a mail from the announce guys that we need a fix on our download section : The links to iotdb 0.8.0 mirrors are ok. But the links to ASC and SHA512 must be direct links to https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/iotdb/... and not to mirrors. Could someone take care of that? Then I

AW: Release 0.8.0 is finished

Hey Kevin, Then I hope even more to see you at apache con :D Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Release 0.8.0 is finished Von: "Kevin A. McGrail" An: dev@iotdb.apache.org,Julian Feinauer Cc: Drinks are on me for the

Re: Release 0.8.0 is finished

e tooling as we have it in Edgent and PLC4X (Which was "borrowed" from Edgent) that automates Downloading of RCs, checking the signatures and hashes. Keep up the good work :-) Chris Am 20.08.19, 09:11 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Fol

Release 0.8.0 is finished

Hi Folks, I just sent out the official ANNOUNCE mail (see below) which will (hopefully) soon appear on all official ASF channels (announce@ list, twitter, homepage, …). This was the last step of the release process and I once again want to thank everybody for participating and contributing

Download section

Hi all, I just observed that most mirrors seem to be synced so the download section already works for me. I'll send the official announce out tomorrow in the morning (utc+2). Once again thanks to Zesong and of course to all others who made this release possible! Julian Von meinem

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

discussed several times). Does everybody agree with that? Julian Am 19.08.19, 08:24 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, haha, you were faster than me... I wanted to write a short "next steps" mail here. The RM (me) does two things next. First, release

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

f Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月19日周一 下午2:13写道： > Hello all, > > the vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC3 has passed with 4 > +1 Votes. > Binding Votes: > > Justin

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-167) v0.9.0 roadmap

Hi Xiangdong, thanks for bringing that up. Your suggestion contains multiple interesting topics. As I'm active in Calcite I love Query Optimization. What are the communities thoughts about that? What do you plan to do or to enable? Julian Am 19.08.19, 05:10 schrieb "xiangdong Huang (JIRA)" :

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hello all, the vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC3 has passed with 4 +1 Votes. Binding Votes: Justin McLean Christofer Dutz Kevin A. McGrail Julian Feinauer No further Votes were cast. Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html

Download section and getting started

Hi all, As the release is accepted and will be be finished soon we should prepare a download section and a getting started on the homepage before we send the official announce via all apache channels Could someone take care of that as I do not understand the homepage code that well :/ Julian

Re: An easier way to create time series.

4 17:12:41, "Julian Feinauer" wrote: >Hi Tian, > >naming i see as a minor issue to change but as a bigger issue to users (nomen est omen...). >Regarding your other comment I don’t get what you mean. > >Think of situations like monitoring stuff fr

Re: An easier way to create time series.

> >Best, >-- >Jialin Qiao >School of Software, Tsinghua University > >乔嘉林 >清华大学 软件学院 > >> -原始邮件- >> 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" >> 发送时间: 2019-08-14 16:10:22 (星期三) >> 收件人: &q

Re: An easier way to create time series.

Hi, let me stick in hier also. One of the things which was at first a bit "unfamiliar" for me was this device focus. It’s a bit to "one-dimensional" in my perspective. Personally, I quite like how Influx does it that you have a name and can attach tags and fields to it. And even if we do not

[LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

/confluence/display/IOTDB/Validating+a+staged+Release The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. From the PPMC Vote we cary over 4 binding IPMC Votes: +1 from Justin McLean, +1 from Christofer Dutz, +1 from Kevin A. McGrail, +1 from Julian Feinauer Thus, I took the freedom to declare the Vote as Lazy

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi all, as announced the vote closes now. The vote PASSES as we have 6 +1 votes from the PPMC, 4 +1 votes from IPMC members and no further 0 or -1 votes. I will now bring the vote to gene...@incubator.apache.org to get approval by the IPMC. If this Vote

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月13日周二 下午4:12写道： > Hi all, > > what one could also use is some "ResponseEnum" which could be hosted in an > error code, perha

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

Hi all, what one could also use is some "ResponseEnum" which could be hosted in an error code, perhaps? But, generally I agree with Tian. Julian Am 13.08.19, 10:07 schrieb "江天" : Well, I prefer to define new Exception classes over ugly error codes, which better utilize OOP.

Re: [REMINDER][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

: 姜宁willem On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 3:55 PM Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi all, > > this is a short reminder for everybody in the iotdb community that we have a vote ongoing for our first Apache Release 0.8.0. > This goes especially to all PPMCs. >

[REMINDER][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi all, this is a short reminder for everybody in the iotdb community that we have a vote ongoing for our first Apache Release 0.8.0. This goes especially to all PPMCs. Please take on your duty and participate in the vote! We currently only have only 3 +1 PPMC votes. I would like to close the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

ink is a hold up > (https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/335) Looking forward to > this release. > > On 8/12/2019 10:27 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi Xiangdong, > > > > I left the vote open for 2 reasons. > > First, we

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

12/2019 10:27 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote: > Hi Xiangdong, > > I left the vote open for 2 reasons. > First, we currently have only 2 PPMC Votes. > Chris vote also counts as PPMC Vote so we could close the vote with 3 +1 Votes (not 4, mine is not binding for PPMC).

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

out ending the vote? There are 4 +1 votes now. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月10日周六 下午4:04写道： > Hi, > > One more from m

AW: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi, One more from my side... We should not focus on the binaries in the Readme. 8 think it's better to prepare a nice download and getting started site where we explain. There we can focus on binaries, that's fine. And downdload site we need after all before sending out an announce (after IPMC

AW: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月9日周五 下午8:37写道： > Hi all, > > This is a short reminder that the vote is open and could close in a few > hours. > But, currently we only have ONE PPMC Vote. > > I think this is especially notable because the

AW: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi all, This is a short reminder that the vote is open and could close in a few hours. But, currently we only have ONE PPMC Vote. I think this is especially notable because the PPMC for iotdb has 20 members. So please PPMCs vote for the release and help us get it out. As RM I would not feel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Am 07.08.19, 11:45 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Boris, thanks fort he comment. I think there is an important subtility in there. As we as ASF only provide source releases, the README should still point to that instruction.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

ws the documents. Boris. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:11 PM Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote: > Hi, > > please keep all discussions around the RC here so that we have the Vote > thread for VOTES only! > > Thanks! > Julian >

[VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi all, thanks to cdutz for finding some major issues in RC2 and fixing them we are able to already provide RC3 now. Important: All PMCs please note that you have to CHECK the release artifacts [1] (see below) before being allowed to vote “+1”, see [3,4]. Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 has

Re: Final fixes before RC3

Sorry, was my own mistake, I had some issues somewhere else... everything is fine : ) Am 06.08.19, 15:46 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi all, after merging Chris PR (thank you Chris!) I just checked everything before preparing the next RC and I observed that I ge

Integrate Calcite and JDBC

Hi all, there has been quite a bit of discussion this at the beginning but its become quiet about that. I think it would be great to move the JDBC Implementation to Calcite for multiple reasons. First, you get support for (nearly) everything in the SQL Standard. Second, you don’t have to

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC2

Hi Justin, thanks for the reminder. But, in this situation I consider the issue that major (and it is to have binaries in a source release) that I see this as a veto. And as I know that Chris is already working on a fix I think its nicer for us to enter the stage with a reasonable clean release

[VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC2

Hi all, thanks to all reviewers of the RC1 and to everybody who helped to fix all issues we are able to vote again for the second release candidate. Important: All PMCs please note that you have to CHECK the release artifacts [2] (see below) before being allowed to vote “+1”, see [3,4].

AW: Issues with the assembly

Hi Chris, Thank you already for jumping in! Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Issues with the assembly Von: Christofer Dutz An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi all, so I spared some time between all of my pre-ApacheCon duties and had a

AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

doesn’t seem to contain any binary content, I can’t really verify this >* README.md: Can’t verify as the binary distribution doesn’t work >* RELEASE_NOTES.md: Same issues as in the source bundle need to notice this issue when we upload to dist.apache.org. Best, ---

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

Hi all, so, the Vote for Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC1 closes. The vote results is: Binding votes: 5 +1, no 0, no -1. BUT one -1 for the binary artefacts. Non-Binding votes: 1 +1 vote. As RM I declare the Vote nonetheless as NOT PASSED and suggest to prepare a RC2. It is not unusual for

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

of the "minor" findings can be addressed with the next release (0.9 I guess) in the meantime. Julian Am 26.07.19, 16:24 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi all, just a short notice. I started to do a release documentation (based on PLC4X) which is in my branch

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

Hi, thanks Chris and Justin for your comments. I also want to point to the checklist (which I had in my initial Vote Email) which I created in our Confluence: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IOTDB/Validating+a+staged+Release Although its important to State that "correct" is only

AW: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

Short nitpick for you Chris: we do not do binary releases :) Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1 Von: Christofer Dutz An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi Xiangdong, I guess you misunderstand what we're

AW: Re: IoTDB vs InfluxDB Benchmark Report

Hey mehedi, That's excellent :) I'm really looking forward to that. One thing you should do is to sign an Icla: https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cla Or here are some other useful resources: https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cla Julian Von meinem

AW: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

Hi Kevin, That's to discuss. As Justin voted +1, I think he himself judges those things as minor enough. I think it's best to wait for other mentors vote (and possible todos) and decide then. What do others think? Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

07.19, 16:17 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread. Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes. If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then t

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

ose files: grep " B " target/rat.txt - Search for SNAPSHOT references find . -type f -name 'pom.xml' -exec grep -| "SNAPSHOT" {} \; - did a full `mvn clean install` on OS X 10.14.4 Julian Am 26.07.19, 16:16 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi all, Fi

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread. Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes. If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then take the details to this thread. Julian

[VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

Hi all, First, thanks to all of you for the support. This first RC is the result of a long process and I want to thank all who participated in it. Special thanks go to our Mentors Justin and Chris who did a lot of support to make this RC hopefully a success. Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 has

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hi all, Someone (xiangdong I think) renamed the artifactId of the "root" to "incubating-iotdb-parent" to have the incubating in artefact name. As Chris just send over a patch to include that via assembly plugin I suggest to change this back to "iotdb-parent" which is in accordance with what

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hi Chris, There is already a pr in place from jialin and xiangdong. Perhaps it would be good to check that. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1 Von: Christofer Dutz An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi

Re: Should remove so many readme.md in submodule?

Hi Boris, +1 from my side. Ideally we have few but well documented files that are also accessible via the homepage (under /documents). Julian Am 25.07.19, 10:12 schrieb "Boris Zhu" : there are so many readme.md which are out of date in many submodules. I think these should be in the

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hi Justin, thanks for the input. These are the things why I wanted a first release to sort all that out : ) I guess we wait until tomorrow with preparation of an RC as Chris can surely assist a bit with things like artefact names and all that stuff. Julian Am 25.07.19, 08:46 schrieb "Justin

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

is a bit better and clearer and eases things for our mentors as its just an RC as they know it and can do their regular checks. What do others (and also our mentors) think? Julian Am 25.07.19, 08:20 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Justin, from Chris email it s

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hi Justin, from Chris email it should work with: > You can test what happens during a release by doing a "mvn package -P > release,apache-release". Julian Am 25.07.19, 08:18 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : HI, > short update on that... INFRA already set up the staging profile on

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Am 24.07.19, 13:47 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Chris, Thanks for the comment. I already requested a profile at infra (https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-18788). But will be good to have your support for the next steps.

Re: Version 0.8.1?

Hey, I found some time and reverted the changes from the first trial in rel/0.8. So we can simply merge it when the PR is agreed on : ) Julian Am 24.07.19, 13:42 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi xiangdong, I we should simply revert the rel branch back to befo

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

and check the contents of the artifacts. If you already did the release prepare, you can even manually build the release. I'll be traveling home tomorrow so I'll be more accessible to help from Friday on. Chris Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> _____

AW: Version 0.8.1?

Hi Xiangdong, There is one tagged commit (tag 'release/0.8.0) in the commit log with version 0.8.0. This commit is the code for rc1. The rel branch shows 0.8.1 as this would be the next bugfix release for 0.8. Does that clarify your question? Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hey, Indeed he made the build and i rely on the build setup we used in plc4x which he build the iotdb on as he told me. And I'm totally against reinventing the wheel for each project so I think the way we used it in plc4x is fine as you only need those artifacts for a release and then staging

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hey Justin, If I recall correctly it does it only in the release :perform phase which currently fails because we have no profile on nexus :) So as soon as this is done we should have the correct source package. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hi Justin, I know and what I meant is that sources will be packaged as tarball by the source release goal from the apache parent maven pom. This indicates pretty clearly what will be inside and what not. Hope that helps. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hi Justin, The source release will be a "regular" maven release of the Java project. So indeed we should check and modify LICENSE and NOTICE files. Personally I'm lacking experience in that so thanks for your input! Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht

Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

Hi all, first, thanks to all, especially xiangdong and jialin for your effort and all the work. With the last PR merged we are (I think) on an excellent way for the release. I opened a Ticket for INFRA to prepare a Staging repository for us [1]. This is the last step, I think to make the

Re: Very frequent commits to rel/0.8

n Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2019-07-23 16:45:37 (星期二) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" > 抄送: > 主题: Re: Very frequent commits

Re: Very frequent commits to rel/0.8

Best, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2019-07-23 15:43:07 (星期二) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" > 抄送: > 主题: Re: Very fr

Licensing / Notice / etc

Hi all, just another think which is VERY important fort he release ist he correctness of all LICENSE files, NOTICE file and all that. So are there any open issues or do we have a good feeling about all that? @Justin: Could you perhaps assist us a bit with a quick check (to avoid that we cast a

Re: Rename modules

黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年7月22日周一 下午8:58写道： > Hi, > > +1 from me. > Regarding merge-hell...if we use git mv it should work out of the box with > very few issues I think __ > > Julian > >

Re: Very frequent commits to rel/0.8

cubator.apache.org? Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年7月22日周一 下午9:01写道： > Hey, > > before finally preparing the fir

Re: Very frequent commits to rel/0.8

er: >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/282 >> > 2. about TsFile documents: >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/274 >> > >> > Best, >> > -- >> > Jiali

Re: Rename modules

rk-iotdb-connector module in > the future, so it could be distinguished from spark-tsfile) > > If this structure is ok, I will resubmit this PR :) > > Best, > -- > Jialin Qiao > School of Software, Tsinghua University > >

Re: Rename modules

Hey, logically the PR iss mall but many changed files : ) The only thing I would take to consider is whether we really do want those names for folders. In other projects you usually make the short name for the folder and longer for the artifact, this means folders would be like For example

Re: Very frequent commits to rel/0.8

bator-iotdb/pull/282 > 2. about TsFile documents: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/274 > > Best, > -- > Jialin Qiao > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 乔嘉林 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > -原始邮件

Very frequent commits to rel/0.8

Hi al, I just checked the git logs and observerd that there are very frequent commits to the branch “rel/0.8”, which should not be the case. So I’ll try to briefly summarize the release process or how the branching model works. The branch rel/0.8 is solely for the preparation for the release.

Re: Cherry-picking without PR

Hi, I got no opinions yet but would like to get some before simply doing it (or forgetting it). Thanks! Julian Am 16.07.19, 10:20 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, as I'm working through the rel/0.8 branch I observed Tests that failed for me. This is due to mi

AW: Binary Release of IoTDB

l of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Julian Feinauer 于2019年7月18日周四 下午4:55写道： > > > I also agree with structure 3. > > > > Am 18.07.19, 10:39 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : > > > > +1 for structure 3. >

Re: Binary Release of IoTDB

of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > > > > > 乔嘉林 > > > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > > > > -原始邮件- > > > > > 发件人: "Xiangdong Huang" > > > > > 发送时间:

AW: A task list needed for releasing 0.8

Hi, Yes and I am about to sketch one based on what we use in the plc4x project https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release.html Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: A task list needed for releasing 0.8 Von: Justin Mclean An:

Re: Binary Release of IoTDB

Sie sichOutlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > ____ > From: Julian Feinauer > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:39:51 PM > To: dev@iotdb.apache.org > Subject: AW: Binary Release of IoTDB > > Hey Chris

AW: Binary Release of IoTDB

are not portable. I would strongly advise not to use them and with the assembly plugin, the binary stuff gets packaged alongside the source bundle during the release build. Chris Holen Sie sichOutlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Julian Feinauer

AW: Binary Release of IoTDB

Hey Chris, I also thought about that and... Contacting you :P But I thought about a bash script :) Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB Von: Christofer Dutz An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: We could whip up a maven

Cherry-picking without PR

Hi, as I'm working through the rel/0.8 branch I observed Tests that failed for me. This is due to minor issues with the Locale. I changed it already in the rel branch but is everybody okay to cherry-pick this to master directly or do you prefer a PR for everything? In other projects we handle

Re: Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8

: Bug Fixes - IOTDB-7 OpenFileNumUtilTest failed fix time zone bug in different region (<---this one does not match a Jira issue) Best, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件-

Re: Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8

branch. If we do major changes there they will be merged back to master regularily and we keep the branch open to support "minor" or "hotfix" releases. Best Julian [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/tree/rel/0.8 Am 16.07.19, 09:43 schrieb "Julian Feinauer&q

Re: Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8

o confirm the source codes and create a release branch now? Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年7月16日周二 下午12:54写道： > Hey Jialin, > &

Binary Release of IoTDB

Hi all, when thinking about the release process I also thought about whether we should provide only source (as is the theory of the ASF) or if we should also provide binary packages. I think the latter is better to make it easier for users to download and run the server. I checked the

Re: Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8

from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0. Best, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2019-07-15 21:48:54 (星期一) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" > 抄送:

Re: Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8

any data > files and configurations that conflict with 0.7. We need to review recently > issues and PRs to filter them out and form the Changes file. > > Best, > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua Univ

Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8

Hi all, first, thanks again to the PPMC to invite me as a Comitter. As I have all necessary rights now I can hereby offer to do the release manager for the release 0.8 which will be the first official ASF release of IoTDB. As suggested in the other Thread, I think it would be good to start off

Re: Start the release train

Hi Xiangdong, that sounds reasonable and can be done. I think first, some preparation has to be done so or so. There already has been a discussion about the branching model to used [1]. Although master and develop are kind of the same thing I would advice to totally stick to the naming

Re: Start the release train

dong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年7月8日周一 上午2:20写道： > Hi all, > > When I checked the list I noticed several threads and discussions about > releasing. > I think we should sta

AW: Synchronization between TsFile and Server

@iotdb.apache.org Betreff: Re: Synchronization between TsFile and Server Ok... so it is my misunderstanding.. --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年6月24日周一 下午3:33写道： > Hey, > > thanks fort he fast reply.

Re: Synchronization between TsFile and Server

ce. I hope this will help you. What's more, I'm looking forward to your feedback. Best Regards, - Tianan Li School of Software, Tsinghua University > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2019-0

Re: Synchronization between TsFile and Server

,> > —> > Tianan Li> > School of Software, Tsinghua University> > > > 在 2019年6月13日，下午6:17，Julian Feinauer > > mailto:j@pragmaticminds.de>> 写道：> > > > > > Hi Tianan,> > > > > > this would be great.> &

Re: New Feature: Multiple Directories

Hi Dongfang, thank you for the very nice report! The feature sounds really great and its really nice that you report it here. Julian Am 24.06.19, 04:04 schrieb "毛东方" : Hi guys, Recently, I've been working on a new feature called "Multiple Directories". Currently, the

Re: Feedback from board report / onlist discussion

oming to ACNA, I would suggest you come to my "From the > Idea to TLP" talk as I will explicitly > talk about this process. How we observed things in the PLC4X project and > how important, but also how rewarding it can be. > > Chris >

Re: Feedback from board report / onlist discussion

Hi, I agree with the sorrows stated. Perhaps, I can share some of my impressions, coming from a just recently graduated podling. At first, I didn’t get the whole "if its not on the list, it didn’t happen" thing. It was kind of annoying and I also know that some people are a bit shy or anxious

Re: Stickers and Swag

aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen ____ From: Julian Feinauer Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 10:09:53 AM To: dev@iotdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Stickers and Swag Hi, no, as I understand it, they have IoTDB Stickers on t

<    1   2   3   4   >