Re: Twitter announce for our Talk at ACEU

2019-10-09 Thread Julian Feinauer
excuse typos Von: Xiangdong Huang Gesendet: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 4:59:06 PM An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Julian Feinauer Betreff: Re: Twitter announce for our Talk at ACEU Well, I registered an Twitter account: @ApacheIotdb :P Best

Twitter announce for our Talk at ACEU

2019-10-08 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, just wanted to share the official ASF Twitter announce for Xiangdong and my talk about IoTDB at ApacheCon EU https://twitter.com/jfeinauer2/status/1181519632349483008 Best Julian

Re: How about a summary of what you're all up to?

2019-10-07 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, overall my impression is that its getting better. Initially it was way calmer here but now there are discussion threads or announcements about features from time to time. So I totally agree with chris but I also think there is already a learning curve. So keep it going guys : ) Julian

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC1

2019-10-04 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, sorry, I am a bit late with my vote.. but then I'll wait for RC2 to vote there. Once again, thank you Xiandong for being RM and you are already doing an excellent Job! Julian Am 02.10.19, 17:17 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi all, The vote of RC1 has lasted more than 72

Re: Release of 0.8.1

2019-09-27 Thread Julian Feinauer
e website ( > http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/), the website also says not > found... > > Best, > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Julian Feinauer 于2019年9月27日周五 下午10:03写道

Re: Release of 0.8.1

2019-09-27 Thread Julian Feinauer
ev/incubator/iotdb/KEYS --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年9月27日周五 下午8:13写道: > Hey, > > but I think we are totally covered here by Apache Policy as a

Re: Release of 0.8.1

2019-09-27 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey, but I think we are totally covered here by Apache Policy as a Release is only a release (and released) if its source in the svn. So although this thing has the "name" release in the tag it has strictly speaking nothing to do with an APACHE release at all. In fact, this is the practice we

Re: Release of 0.8.1

2019-09-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Xiangdong, thank you very much for taking care of the release as RM. Normal practice would be to keep all work in the rel/0.8 branch and just merge in the develop there and do the release tags and stuff in there. Feel free to ask me (or also Chris) if you have questions or issues! Julian

Re: Reminding of changes in RPC

2019-09-23 Thread Julian Feinauer
> -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2019-09-19 23:07:16 (星期四) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" > 抄送: > 主题: AW: Reminding of changes in RPC > > Totally agree. This should be considered a change not just

AW: Reminding of changes in RPC

2019-09-19 Thread Julian Feinauer
Totally agree. This should be considered a change not just a fix and thus be in a version 0.9.x but not in 0.8.x Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Reminding of changes in RPC Von: 徐毅 An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi, Change

Re: Release of 0.8.1

2019-09-18 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, I like the idea of more releases. But I suggest to do one at a time during learning... would you do the RM this time @Xiangdong Huang? Julian Am 17.09.19, 01:02 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, Thanks Jialin. As there is so many bugs that be solved, how about

Re: Add bloom filters to TsFile

2019-09-10 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, I like the idea. I'm just adding Claude here as we talked yesterday about a bloom filter implementation he has already done. @cla...@apache.org what do you think? : ) Julian From: Tian Jiang Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Re: A simple tool to visualize logs

2019-09-08 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, I definetly need that (to adopt to our stuff!) Julian Am 08.09.19, 09:13 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, Sounds COOOL! Analyzing system log is one of the most thing for a complex system (especially for distributed system). Will try this feature ASAP

Re: A new result set format

2019-09-07 Thread Julian Feinauer
able and in a narrow table > are two different tasks. > > > Sincerely, > Lei Rui > > > From: Jialin Qiao > Date: 9/7/2019 15:26 > To: > Subject: Re: A new result set format > Hi Julian, > > He is my friend and

Re: A new result set format

2019-09-07 Thread Julian Feinauer
put issue in the mail list himself :) Best, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" > 发送时间: 2019-09-07 13:52:17 (星期六) > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"

Re: A new result set format

2019-09-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Jialin, perhaps one question about "wanted by users" means (as I didn’t see anything on the list). How do these users get in contact with you? Julian Am 07.09.19, 04:29 schrieb "Jialin Qiao" : Hi, As described in this issue, a new result set format is wanted by users. I'd

AW: time series with double datatype insert problem

2019-09-05 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi yes, that's javas default. Float types always with dot. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: time series with double datatype insert problem Von: Jialin Qiao An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi, When I try the following java codes, it

Re: A serious hidden but simple bug caused by object abnormal publishing

2019-09-05 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, I agree with Xiangdongs suggestion to have a separate PR for that as its easier to review and track it down. In some cases such "critical bugs" would even lead to a "hotfix" release like 0.8.1 so its good to have them in a separate commit for cherry-picking also. Julian Am 05.09.19,

AW: Document of master

2019-09-03 Thread Julian Feinauer
It also is a good training opportunity for new RMs :) Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Document of master Von: Justin Mclean An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: HI, > Some users want to use the functions in master. However, when they request >

AW: podling report draft - September 2019

2019-09-01 Thread Julian Feinauer
I like it. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: podling report draft - September 2019 Von: Xiangdong Huang An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi, I update the draft according to Chris and Justin's suggestions. If there is no more suggestion,

Re: Short summary on what you're up to?

2019-08-28 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, I really would love to drive the Calcite integration further but am lacking time AND clarity about the ideal data model to exposte time series as tables but I guess that’s nothing for 0.9.0. And.. I have to file a Jira for that, also : ) Julian Am 28.08.19, 09:36 schrieb "Xiangdong

[ANNOUNCE] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 released

2019-08-25 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, Finally, the official announce went out... See [1] below for the mail. Now, the release is finished. Thanks again to all who helped! Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/e362abd59de0711bf4653f82f99192980a4c70a29844f7130ab5ddda@%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E Von meinem

AW: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-175) dist.apache.org must not be used for public downloads

2019-08-23 Thread Julian Feinauer
Thanks. If you close the issue Sebb will get notified and hopefully our announce can go out then. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-175) dist.apache.org must not be used for public downloads Von: Xiangdong

Re: Homepage fix

2019-08-23 Thread Julian Feinauer
apache.org/#/Materials/Release%20Notes Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月23日周五 上午3:16写道: > Hi xiangdong, > > good catch ther

Re: Homepage fix

2019-08-22 Thread Julian Feinauer
(i.e., no "dev") > > Best, > > > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月22日周四 上午12:24写道: > >> Just

Re: Homepage fix

2019-08-22 Thread Julian Feinauer
er that, I will update the page again. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月22日周四 下午1:11写道: > Hi xiangdong, > > Excellent catch...

AW: Homepage fix

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
y 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月22日周四 上午12:24写道: > Just a short addition: > I copied from the flink site the following statement (which should > suffice), regarding the hash verification: > > > Verifying Hashes and Signatures > > Along with our releases, we also

Re: Homepage fix

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
Software Foundation has an extensive tutorial to verify hashes and signatures which you can follow by using any of these release-signing KEYS. Am 21.08.19, 18:22 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hey, I got some further requests to fix which we should address before the ann

Re: Homepage fix

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
. The download page needs say that downloaders should verify releases, and describe how to do so using KEYS + sig, or hash. === Thanks! Julian Am 21.08.19, 15:28 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, thanks fort he fast fix, I already resend the ANNOUNCE mail.. so

FW: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
Yay, we are in both Cons : ) Julian Am 20.08.19, 23:47 schrieb "Roman Shaposhnik" : Hi All! thanks a million for this tremendous interest in Podling's Shark Tank. We now have: ApacheCON NA in Las Vegas: Daffodil ShardingSphere Heron

Re: [Discuss] how to organize PRs (for fixing bugs) to the next version or v0.8.1?

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, I agree with Willem. PRs should generally go to master (develop, see discussion below). If we discuss that one Patch is so important that we want to create a "hotfix" release than we will pick it to the "rel/0.8" branch and do a new release there (tagget then 'release/0.8.1' for example).

Re: Homepage fix

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
t. Please review PR > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb-website/pull/30 > Or I will merge it a short time later. > > Best, > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东

Re: [DISCUSS] Any idea for the Apache IoTDB talk on Apache Con NA 2019?

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
perhaps show how it relates to parquet and others). Julian Von: Xiangdong Huang Datum: Mittwoch, 21. August 2019 um 15:20 An: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" , Julian Feinauer , 乔嘉林 <646274...@qq.com>, 刘睿 <245422...@qq.com>, "qingxin.f...@hotmail.com" , "xingtan...@apa

Homepage fix

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, Just got a mail from the announce guys that we need a fix on our download section : The links to iotdb 0.8.0 mirrors are ok. But the links to ASC and SHA512 must be direct links to https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/iotdb/... and not to mirrors. Could someone take care of that? Then I

AW: Release 0.8.0 is finished

2019-08-20 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey Kevin, Then I hope even more to see you at apache con :D Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Release 0.8.0 is finished Von: "Kevin A. McGrail" An: dev@iotdb.apache.org,Julian Feinauer Cc: Drinks are on me for the

Re: Release 0.8.0 is finished

2019-08-20 Thread Julian Feinauer
e tooling as we have it in Edgent and PLC4X (Which was "borrowed" from Edgent) that automates Downloading of RCs, checking the signatures and hashes. Keep up the good work :-) Chris Am 20.08.19, 09:11 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Fol

Release 0.8.0 is finished

2019-08-20 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Folks, I just sent out the official ANNOUNCE mail (see below) which will (hopefully) soon appear on all official ASF channels (announce@ list, twitter, homepage, …). This was the last step of the release process and I once again want to thank everybody for participating and contributing

Download section

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, I just observed that most mirrors seem to be synced so the download section already works for me. I'll send the official announce out tomorrow in the morning (utc+2). Once again thanks to Zesong and of course to all others who made this release possible! Julian Von meinem

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Feinauer
discussed several times). Does everybody agree with that? Julian Am 19.08.19, 08:24 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, haha, you were faster than me... I wanted to write a short "next steps" mail here. The RM (me) does two things next. First, release

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Feinauer
f Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月19日周一 下午2:13写道: > Hello all, > > the vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC3 has passed with 4 > +1 Votes. > Binding Votes: > > Justin

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-167) v0.9.0 roadmap

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Xiangdong, thanks for bringing that up. Your suggestion contains multiple interesting topics. As I'm active in Calcite I love Query Optimization. What are the communities thoughts about that? What do you plan to do or to enable? Julian Am 19.08.19, 05:10 schrieb "xiangdong Huang (JIRA)" :

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hello all, the vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC3 has passed with 4 +1 Votes. Binding Votes: Justin McLean Christofer Dutz Kevin A. McGrail Julian Feinauer No further Votes were cast. Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html

Download section and getting started

2019-08-17 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, As the release is accepted and will be be finished soon we should prepare a download section and a getting started on the homepage before we send the official announce via all apache channels Could someone take care of that as I do not understand the homepage code that well :/ Julian

WG: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

2019-08-14 Thread Julian Feinauer
Wer should definitely participate here! Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank Von: Roman Shaposhnik An: general ,Roman Shaposhnik Cc: Hi Podlings! in less than a month we're going to

Re: An easier way to create time series.

2019-08-14 Thread Julian Feinauer
4 17:12:41, "Julian Feinauer" wrote: >Hi Tian, > >naming i see as a minor issue to change but as a bigger issue to users (nomen est omen...). >Regarding your other comment I don’t get what you mean. > >Think of situations like monitoring stuff fr

Re: An easier way to create time series.

2019-08-14 Thread Julian Feinauer
> >Best, >-- >Jialin Qiao >School of Software, Tsinghua University > >乔嘉林 >清华大学 软件学院 > >> -原始邮件- >> 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" >> 发送时间: 2019-08-14 16:10:22 (星期三) >> 收件人: &q

Re: An easier way to create time series.

2019-08-14 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, let me stick in hier also. One of the things which was at first a bit "unfamiliar" for me was this device focus. It’s a bit to "one-dimensional" in my perspective. Personally, I quite like how Influx does it that you have a name and can attach tags and fields to it. And even if we do not

[LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-13 Thread Julian Feinauer
/confluence/display/IOTDB/Validating+a+staged+Release The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. From the PPMC Vote we cary over 4 binding IPMC Votes: +1 from Justin McLean, +1 from Christofer Dutz, +1 from Kevin A. McGrail, +1 from Julian Feinauer Thus, I took the freedom to declare the Vote as Lazy

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-13 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, as announced the vote closes now. The vote PASSES as we have 6 +1 votes from the PPMC, 4 +1 votes from IPMC members and no further 0 or -1 votes. I will now bring the vote to gene...@incubator.apache.org to get approval by the IPMC. If this Vote

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

2019-08-13 Thread Julian Feinauer
Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月13日周二 下午4:12写道: > Hi all, > > what one could also use is some "ResponseEnum" which could be hosted in an > error code, perha

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

2019-08-13 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, what one could also use is some "ResponseEnum" which could be hosted in an error code, perhaps? But, generally I agree with Tian. Julian Am 13.08.19, 10:07 schrieb "江天" : Well, I prefer to define new Exception classes over ugly error codes, which better utilize OOP.

Re: [REMINDER][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-13 Thread Julian Feinauer
: 姜宁willem On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 3:55 PM Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi all, > > this is a short reminder for everybody in the iotdb community that we have a vote ongoing for our first Apache Release 0.8.0. > This goes especially to all PPMCs. >

[REMINDER][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-13 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, this is a short reminder for everybody in the iotdb community that we have a vote ongoing for our first Apache Release 0.8.0. This goes especially to all PPMCs. Please take on your duty and participate in the vote! We currently only have only 3 +1 PPMC votes. I would like to close the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-12 Thread Julian Feinauer
ink is a hold up > (https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/335) Looking forward to > this release. > > On 8/12/2019 10:27 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi Xiangdong, > > > > I left the vote open for 2 reasons. > > First, we

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-12 Thread Julian Feinauer
12/2019 10:27 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote: > Hi Xiangdong, > > I left the vote open for 2 reasons. > First, we currently have only 2 PPMC Votes. > Chris vote also counts as PPMC Vote so we could close the vote with 3 +1 Votes (not 4, mine is not binding for PPMC).

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-12 Thread Julian Feinauer
out ending the vote? There are 4 +1 votes now. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月10日周六 下午4:04写道: > Hi, > > One more from m

AW: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-10 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, One more from my side... We should not focus on the binaries in the Readme. 8 think it's better to prepare a nice download and getting started site where we explain. There we can focus on binaries, that's fine. And downdload site we need after all before sending out an announce (after IPMC

AW: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-10 Thread Julian Feinauer
of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月9日周五 下午8:37写道: > Hi all, > > This is a short reminder that the vote is open and could close in a few > hours. > But, currently we only have ONE PPMC Vote. > > I think this is especially notable because the

AW: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-09 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, This is a short reminder that the vote is open and could close in a few hours. But, currently we only have ONE PPMC Vote. I think this is especially notable because the PPMC for iotdb has 20 members. So please PPMCs vote for the release and help us get it out. As RM I would not feel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-07 Thread Julian Feinauer
Am 07.08.19, 11:45 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Boris, thanks fort he comment. I think there is an important subtility in there. As we as ASF only provide source releases, the README should still point to that instruction.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-07 Thread Julian Feinauer
ws the documents. Boris. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:11 PM Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote: > Hi, > > please keep all discussions around the RC here so that we have the Vote > thread for VOTES only! > > Thanks! > Julian >

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-07 Thread Julian Feinauer
and check the contents of LICENSE-binary and NOTICE-binary - [Not necessary] Started Server, started Client, Client connects sucessfully One minor issue found: One minor thing here: Hive in NOTICE is stated as 2008 - 2018... should it be 2019 here? Julian Am 06.08.19, 16:56 schrieb "J

AW: Integrate Calcite and JDBC

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
one prefer to the performance while others prefer the standard sql). Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月6日周二 上午5:59写道: > Hi all, > > there has been quite a bit of discussion this at th

Re: Final fixes before RC3

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月6日周二 上午7:18写道: > Sorry, was my own mistake, I had some issues somewhere else... everything > is fine : ) > > Am 06.08.19, 15:46 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" < > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, please keep all discussions around the RC here so that we have the Vote thread for VOTES only! Thanks! Julian

[VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, thanks to cdutz for finding some major issues in RC2 and fixing them we are able to already provide RC3 now. Important: All PMCs please note that you have to CHECK the release artifacts [1] (see below) before being allowed to vote “+1”, see [3,4]. Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 has

Re: Final fixes before RC3

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
Sorry, was my own mistake, I had some issues somewhere else... everything is fine : ) Am 06.08.19, 15:46 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi all, after merging Chris PR (thank you Chris!) I just checked everything before preparing the next RC and I observed that I ge

Final fixes before RC3

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, after merging Chris PR (thank you Chris!) I just checked everything before preparing the next RC and I observed that I get an issue with the created binaries. I can start the server without Problems. But when I start the Client I get: 2019-08-06 15:43:32,498

Integrate Calcite and JDBC

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, there has been quite a bit of discussion this at the beginning but its become quiet about that. I think it would be great to move the JDBC Implementation to Calcite for multiple reasons. First, you get support for (nearly) everything in the SQL Standard. Second, you don’t have to

Re: Findings in the build

2019-08-06 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Chris, thanks fort he changes. I checked the PR and all artefact seem to be as they should be. So are there any other issues to be addressed before spinning up the next round (RC3)? Julian Am 05.08.19, 14:46 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi all, I just submitted a PR:

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC2

2019-08-05 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Justin, thanks for the reminder. But, in this situation I consider the issue that major (and it is to have binaries in a source release) that I see this as a veto. And as I know that Chris is already working on a fix I think its nicer for us to enter the stage with a reasonable clean release

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC2

2019-08-05 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, due to the binding -1 Vote of Chris and the major issues he raised (and I guess nobody will argue about) I hereby cancel the Vote for 0.8.0 RC2. Chris already told me that he is preparing a PR where he fixes the issues he observed (thanks for that!) so we'll wait for that to create a

AW: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC2

2019-08-03 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Chris, When thinking about it, I definitely agree. I just copied over the mail template from an other poling where it was created from an apache member which may not be named here :P But +1. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff:

[VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC2

2019-08-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, thanks to all reviewers of the RC1 and to everybody who helped to fix all issues we are able to vote again for the second release candidate. Important: All PMCs please note that you have to CHECK the release artifacts [2] (see below) before being allowed to vote “+1”, see [3,4].

AW: Issues with the assembly

2019-08-01 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Chris, Thank you already for jumping in! Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Issues with the assembly Von: Christofer Dutz An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi all, so I spared some time between all of my pre-ApacheCon duties and had a

AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-31 Thread Julian Feinauer
doesn’t seem to contain any binary content, I can’t really verify this >* README.md: Can’t verify as the binary distribution doesn’t work >* RELEASE_NOTES.md: Same issues as in the source bundle need to notice this issue when we upload to dist.apache.org. Best, ---

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-30 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, so, the Vote for Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC1 closes. The vote results is: Binding votes: 5 +1, no 0, no -1. BUT one -1 for the binary artefacts. Non-Binding votes: 1 +1 vote. As RM I declare the Vote nonetheless as NOT PASSED and suggest to prepare a RC2. It is not unusual for

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-29 Thread Julian Feinauer
of the "minor" findings can be addressed with the next release (0.9 I guess) in the meantime. Julian Am 26.07.19, 16:24 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi all, just a short notice. I started to do a release documentation (based on PLC4X) which is in my branch

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-29 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, thanks Chris and Justin for your comments. I also want to point to the checklist (which I had in my initial Vote Email) which I created in our Confluence: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IOTDB/Validating+a+staged+Release Although its important to State that "correct" is only

AW: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-29 Thread Julian Feinauer
Short nitpick for you Chris: we do not do binary releases :) Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1 Von: Christofer Dutz An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi Xiangdong, I guess you misunderstand what we're

AW: Re: IoTDB vs InfluxDB Benchmark Report

2019-07-27 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey mehedi, That's excellent :) I'm really looking forward to that. One thing you should do is to sign an Icla: https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cla Or here are some other useful resources: https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cla Julian Von meinem

AW: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-27 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Kevin, That's to discuss. As Justin voted +1, I think he himself judges those things as minor enough. I think it's best to wait for other mentors vote (and possible todos) and decide then. What do others think? Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
07.19, 16:17 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread. Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes. If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then t

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
ose files: grep " B " target/rat.txt - Search for SNAPSHOT references find . -type f -name 'pom.xml' -exec grep -| "SNAPSHOT" {} \; - did a full `mvn clean install` on OS X 10.14.4 Julian Am 26.07.19, 16:16 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi all, Fi

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread. Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes. If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then take the details to this thread. Julian

[VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

2019-07-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, First, thanks to all of you for the support. This first RC is the result of a long process and I want to thank all who participated in it. Special thanks go to our Mentors Justin and Chris who did a lot of support to make this RC hopefully a success. Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 has

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, Someone (xiangdong I think) renamed the artifactId of the "root" to "incubating-iotdb-parent" to have the incubating in artefact name. As Chris just send over a patch to include that via assembly plugin I suggest to change this back to "iotdb-parent" which is in accordance with what

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-26 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Chris, There is already a pr in place from jialin and xiangdong. Perhaps it would be good to check that. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1 Von: Christofer Dutz An: dev@iotdb.apache.org Cc: Hi

Re: Should remove so many readme.md in submodule?

2019-07-25 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Boris, +1 from my side. Ideally we have few but well documented files that are also accessible via the homepage (under /documents). Julian Am 25.07.19, 10:12 schrieb "Boris Zhu" : there are so many readme.md which are out of date in many submodules. I think these should be in the

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-25 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Justin, thanks for the input. These are the things why I wanted a first release to sort all that out : ) I guess we wait until tomorrow with preparation of an RC as Chris can surely assist a bit with things like artefact names and all that stuff. Julian Am 25.07.19, 08:46 schrieb "Justin

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-25 Thread Julian Feinauer
is a bit better and clearer and eases things for our mentors as its just an RC as they know it and can do their regular checks. What do others (and also our mentors) think? Julian Am 25.07.19, 08:20 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Justin, from Chris email it s

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-25 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Justin, from Chris email it should work with: > You can test what happens during a release by doing a "mvn package -P > release,apache-release". Julian Am 25.07.19, 08:18 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : HI, > short update on that... INFRA already set up the staging profile on

Re: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-25 Thread Julian Feinauer
Am 24.07.19, 13:47 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi Chris, Thanks for the comment. I already requested a profile at infra (https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-18788). But will be good to have your support for the next steps.

Re: Version 0.8.1?

2019-07-24 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey, I found some time and reverted the changes from the first trial in rel/0.8. So we can simply merge it when the PR is agreed on : ) Julian Am 24.07.19, 13:42 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi xiangdong, I we should simply revert the rel branch back to befo

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-24 Thread Julian Feinauer
and check the contents of the artifacts. If you already did the release prepare, you can even manually build the release. I'll be traveling home tomorrow so I'll be more accessible to help from Friday on. Chris Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> _____

AW: Version 0.8.1?

2019-07-24 Thread Julian Feinauer
, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年7月24日周三 下午5:12写道: > Hi Xiangdong, > > There is one tagged commit (tag 'release/0.8.0) in the commit log with > version 0.8.0. This commit is the

AW: Version 0.8.1?

2019-07-24 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Xiangdong, There is one tagged commit (tag 'release/0.8.0) in the commit log with version 0.8.0. This commit is the code for rc1. The rel branch shows 0.8.1 as this would be the next bugfix release for 0.8. Does that clarify your question? Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-24 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey, Indeed he made the build and i rely on the build setup we used in plc4x which he build the iotdb on as he told me. And I'm totally against reinventing the wheel for each project so I think the way we used it in plc4x is fine as you only need those artifacts for a release and then staging

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-24 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hey Justin, If I recall correctly it does it only in the release :perform phase which currently fails because we have no profile on nexus :) So as soon as this is done we should have the correct source package. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht

AW: Next steps for release 0.8.0-rc1

2019-07-24 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Justin, I know and what I meant is that sources will be packaged as tarball by the source release goal from the apache parent maven pom. This indicates pretty clearly what will be inside and what not. Hope that helps. Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche

  1   2   3   >