Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Robert Matthews
I've spent some time working through this and have tested what I can. I've even built another component using the new core. I have unfortunately come across a bit of a problem that prevents one of my applications from running. It due to the new model validation, which balks at methods that

Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Dan Haywood
Hi Rob, OK, thx for doing this testing. If this patch were applied, would it be a positive vote from you? In particular, did you check the license stuff out as well? Thx Dan On 18 December 2012 18:43, Robert Matthews rmatth...@nakedobjects.orgwrote: I've spent some time working through this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Robert Matthews
No I haven't looked at the license stuff yet (so I can't properly answer the first question yet, but I it would be +1 if the license stuff is good). Rob On 12/18/12 18:48, Dan Haywood wrote: Hi Rob, OK, thx for doing this testing. If this patch were applied, would it be a positive vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Dan Haywood
ok. Well, I'll take a risk and push an updated release out tonight with your patch and hope that there's nothing missing in the license stuff. (I'm hoping that Mark and/or Benson and/or Nour will also check things on that front, being as they have more experience and might see something that

Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Jeroen van der Wal
In the process of verifying I encountered the fact that I have to specify the keyserver in this way gpg --verify --keyserver pgp.mit.ede signature file In the output I also noticed that Dan's key is not trusted: $ gpg --verify --keyserver pgp.mit.edu isis-1.0.0-source-release.asc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Dan Haywood
On 18 December 2012 20:02, Jeroen van der Wal jer...@stromboli.it wrote: In the output I also noticed that Dan's key is not trusted: Um, it *is* trusted, in that it is counter-signed by various other members in the ASF web of trust:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Jeroen van der Wal
Ok, following this procedure omits the need to specify a keyserver. Still untrusted though: gpg --import ~/Development/apache-isis/KEYS gpg: key 2FDB81B1: public key Mark Struberg (Apache) strub...@apache.org imported gpg: key 77AD2E23: Dan Haywood (CODE SIGNING KEY) danhayw...@apache.org not

Re: [VOTE] Apache Isis Core1.0.0, JDO Object Store 1.0.0, File Security 1.0.0, Wicket Viewer 1.0.0, RestfulObjects Viewer 1.0.0

2012-12-18 Thread Dan Haywood
thx for this, Jeroen. Per Robert's email earlier in this thread, and also one small thing that Mark Stru noticed (off-list), I'll need to go round the loop again. So put some time aside again later in the week and hopefully next time the release will go thru... Cheers Dan On 18 December 2012