[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-604?page=comments#action_12445097 ]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-604:
i think we can close the issue ..
thanks
claus
After saving over Webdav the jcr:encoding property is deleted
I'm not sure if this belongs in the dev list but since I didn't get any
response on the user list I try here. Please tell me if I'm breaking any
mailing list policies.
/Magnus
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Grimsell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 3:56
I think both approaches have their disadvantages. Using a map requires casting
to Strings (we currently have to stick with 1.4, I think) and Properties class
exposes methods like store and load which are useless (or even dangerous).
I propose we change the RepositoryService interface and use
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-604?page=comments#action_12445103 ]
angela commented on JCR-604:
tja... i guess that resetting the properties upon a PUT that replaces an
existing resource is not according to the RFC.
so maybe we should
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-604?page=comments#action_12445106 ]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-604:
hi angela.
i dont know wich mehtod is called if you open the file directly with ms-word
and perform a save.
if the bahaviour is not
Marcel Reutegger schrieb:
I think both approaches have their disadvantages. Using a map requires
casting to Strings (we currently have to stick with 1.4, I think) and
Properties class exposes methods like store and load which are useless
(or even dangerous).
Well, SPI already uses generic
well, weird.
can you file a jira issue?
regards, toby
On 10/27/06, Magnus Grimsell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if this belongs in the dev list but since I didn't get any
response on the user list I try here. Please tell me if I'm breaking any
mailing list policies.
/Magnus
Jukka Zitting schrieb:
Hi,
On 10/27/06, Marcel Reutegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose we change the RepositoryService interface and use the two
descriptor
methods defined in javax.jcr.Repository: getDescriptorKeys() and
getDescriptor(). The implementation then can use whatever
Julian Reschke wrote:
Marcel Reutegger schrieb:
I think both approaches have their disadvantages. Using a map requires
casting to Strings (we currently have to stick with 1.4, I think) and
Properties class exposes methods like store and load which are useless
(or even dangerous).
Well, SPI
The most logical difference would be that a Set tells you that the elements
stored in it will be unique while a Collection might permit you to introduce
duplicates.
-Tako
On 10/27/06, Marcel Reutegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote:
Marcel Reutegger schrieb:
I think both
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-535?page=comments#action_12445194 ]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-535:
---
About this issue, can I assume there are no concurrent operations?
no. why would you assume that?
I am deleting
Jukka Zitting wrote:
How about remote clients that would prefer to get all the descriptors
in one call?
hmm... good point. even though caching the descriptors would be trivial.
I've just changed the relevant methods to use a Map instead of the Properties
class.
regards
marcel
Julian Reschke wrote:
Marcel Reutegger schrieb:
because we didn't see a need for a Set. a collection is IMO
sufficient. what is the benefit of a Set over a Collection for a client?
The client can rely on not having duplicates in it,
The client can rely on it anyway because the documentation
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-608?page=all ]
Magnus Grimsell updated JCR-608:
Attachment: JackRabbitTest.java
Test case to reproduce the bug
NullPointerException in indexer when creating versionable node on virgin
repository
Empty custom_nodetypes.xml after restart
Key: JCR-609
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-609
Project: Jackrabbit
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jca
Affects Versions: 1.1
Hi,
Cool. This is a great idea.
For the nightlies (and tests) I suggest you setup an automatic build
tools such as Continuum.
Regards
Felix
On 10/26/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to request a Solaris zone [1] for the Jackrabbit project.
The main uses of the
16 matches
Mail list logo