[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515967
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1037:
Just checking for the obvious case, I assume you did call Session.save()
+1 Release the packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1
successfully compiled from source and ran automated tests on w2k with java 6.
cheers
stefan
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is upgrading
Jira in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516009
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1037:
The more you can simplify the test case while still preserving the problem
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is upgrading
Jira in a short while and will then be able to explicitly limit the
Hi,
People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is upgrading
Jira in a short while and will then be able to explicitly limit the
size of query results,
Thomas, will the binaries data store patch be available for the revision
of Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release ?
Thanks,
Pablo
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 6:57 AM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516032
]
Antonio Carballo commented on JCR-1037:
---
It will take us several days to do so. Let's see what we can come up to
Did you already try out this feature?
Yes. The serialization issue with large binary objects is truly critical
for our project.
Pablo
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 12:29 PM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira]
Yes, it would be great !
We've started working on a DataStore implementation based on a dbms. We
can share that work when it get in well form.
Thanks,
Pablo
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 12:15 PM
To:
Hi,
Sure, I can create such a patch. However it will take some time. Did
you already try out this feature?
Thomas
On 7/27/07, Pablo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm asking just for a the patch (i.e.: dataStore5.patch), that can be
applied to the revision of JR 1.3.1 release.
Thanks
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a reason that the bundle persistence manager ddl for posgresql
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-889) was not applied to 1.3.1 ?
Can this be slipped in ? :)
It's a feature issue and not a bug fix. I try to put only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515995
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-964:
---
Noah Vihinen commented on JCR-964:
--
Sorry I'm late...
Is there a reason that the bundle persistence manager ddl for posgresql
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-889) was not applied to 1.3.1 ?
Can this be slipped in ? :)
Thanks,
Florent
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit
Hi,
I'm the wrong person to ask, but I don't think so... It's a new
feature and requires changes in a few internal APIs.
Jukka?
Thomas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516008
]
Antonio Carballo commented on JCR-1037:
---
Yes. Session.save() is called after every add/update of a every
I'm asking just for a the patch (i.e.: dataStore5.patch), that can be
applied to the revision of JR 1.3.1 release.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 12:12 PM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Pablo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm asking just for a the patch (i.e.: dataStore5.patch), that can be
applied to the revision of JR 1.3.1 release.
If you need the data store functionality already now, before
Jackrabbit 1.4, I would strongly suggest that you use a snapshot
Hello,
I need to integrate jackrabbit in an architecture SOA, where there are many
applications that need to save some data in the repository, the question is
can i access to the repository with webservices.
thanks.
MATMANE
--
On 7/27/07, Mohammed ATMANE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I need to integrate jackrabbit in an architecture SOA, where there are many
applications that need to save some data in the repository, the question is
can i access to the repository with webservices.
thanks.
MATMANE
This is a
We are not planning to backport the data store patch to 1.3 release.
We'd like to know if is it better, in terms of stability, to have the
patch applied to 1.3.1 release instead of the revision the latest
version of the patch was applied to (revision # 553213)
Thanks,
Pablo
-Original
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
All sigs and hashes good. However, I am getting test failures on
OS X 10.4.10 (PPC) with java version 1.5.0_07
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
23 matches
Mail list logo
