Hi,
Please can you provide me write access to JackRabbit wiki pages. I am
working on the repository and would like to update wiki with my findings
and POC work.
Thanks and Regards
Gayatri
Hi Gayatri,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:22 PM, gayatri mehra gmehra0...@gmail.com wrote:
Please can you provide me write access to JackRabbit wiki pages. I am
working on the repository and would like to update wiki with my findings and
POC work.
Great! What's your wiki username?
BR,
Jukka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620693#comment-13620693
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-3555:
Hmm, you're right. Now that I look at the code in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620706#comment-13620706
]
Lukas Eder commented on JCR-3555:
-
+1 for naming the utility method in(). That makes it very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620710#comment-13620710
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-3555:
Sounds like we're converging on consensus here.
In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620727#comment-13620727
]
Michael Dürig commented on JCR-3555:
+1 for IllegalStateException instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620735#comment-13620735
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-3555:
Perhaps something like this:
public class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620738#comment-13620738
]
Michael Dürig commented on JCR-3555:
Exactly!
Add a static utility to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620735#comment-13620735
]
Jukka Zitting edited comment on JCR-3555 at 4/3/13 8:42 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lukas Eder updated JCR-3555:
Attachment: JcrUtils.java.patch
Attached a patch (JcrUtils.java.patch) containing:
- Removal of previously
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620784#comment-13620784
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-3555:
Nice work! Patch applied in revision 1463890.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620789#comment-13620789
]
Lukas Eder commented on JCR-3555:
-
Thanks. That'll only leave us with the open question of
Sergiy Shyrkov created JCR-3556:
---
Summary: IndexingConfigurationImpl.getAggregateRules() should
return null in case no aggregate rules are configured
Key: JCR-3556
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-3556.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.7
Makes sense.
Implemented in revision: 1464025
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank van Lankvelt updated JCR-3382:
Affects Version/s: 2.6
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank van Lankvelt updated JCR-3382:
Attachment: JCR-3382.patch
check whether the node can be read after retrieving it from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620953#comment-13620953
]
Frank van Lankvelt edited comment on JCR-3382 at 4/3/13 2:31 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620972#comment-13620972
]
Unico Hommes commented on JCR-3382:
---
Patch committed to trunk in revision 1464059. Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620976#comment-13620976
]
Unico Hommes commented on JCR-3382:
---
Backported to 2.6 branch in revision 1464061.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Unico Hommes updated JCR-3382:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.7
2.6.1
Status: Resolved (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620987#comment-13620987
]
Sergiy Shyrkov commented on JCR-3556:
-
Thank you for a quick fix Marcel!
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit-trunk (build #2095)
Status: Fixed
Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/2095/ to
view the results.
hi ian
One last question.
Should I expect a a SecurityConfiguration to be present ?
no, you have to specify the security provider you want to
use. this is still work in progress but right now SecurityProvider
was the entry point to use. there is also a known TODO in the
Oak class because the
hi
while taking a closer look at the base state associated with a TreeImpl
i got the impression at the same base NodeState is also available from
the NodeBuilder associated with the tree.
if this was really the case: what is the reason for keeping it twice?
regards
angela
On 3.4.13 9:15, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi
while taking a closer look at the base state associated with a TreeImpl
i got the impression at the same base NodeState is also available from
the NodeBuilder associated with the tree.
if this was really the case: what is the reason for keeping it
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #1095
Status: Fixed
Duration: 28 minutes and 19 seconds
Commit: b122090 (trunk)
Author: Angela Schreiber
Message: minor improvement
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/trunk@1463961
On 3.4.13 11:26, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 3.4.13 9:15, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi
while taking a closer look at the base state associated with a TreeImpl
i got the impression at the same base NodeState is also available from
the NodeBuilder associated with the tree.
if this was really the
27 matches
Mail list logo
