hello all,
any other opinion on that? Minimal patch (17/Feb/2014) shouldn't cause any
harm and would help me a lot in Sling.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3727
Thanks,
O.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985500#comment-13985500
]
Shankar Pednekar commented on JCR-3668:
---
This is similar to JCR3763
Please refer the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting updated JCR-3667:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.8)
Possible regression with accepted content types when extracting and
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit-trunk (build #2219)
Status: Fixed
Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/2219/ to
view the results.
Alexander Klimetschek created JCR-3777:
--
Summary: Add simple allow/deny/clear convenience methods to
AccessControlUtils
Key: JCR-3777
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3777
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Klimetschek reassigned JCR-3777:
--
Assignee: Alexander Klimetschek
Add simple allow/deny/clear convenience methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Klimetschek updated JCR-3777:
---
Attachment: JCR-3777.patch
Attached patch: [^JCR-3777.patch]
Add simple
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3777
WDYT?
Patch is attached. If ok, I can commit it (would be my first commit in ages :)).
Cheers,
Alex
Hi,
A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.8.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.8.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/2.8.0/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
On 29/04/2014 16:06, Davide Giannella wrote:
...
Serving searches could be done either by the `:next` stream or by the
`:next` and then merged on the fly with the current `:next-ID` in the
iterator while returning the resultset.
Any thoughts on the above?
More thinking around it... if can't
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/10
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-win7
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
testMatchMultipleNonMatchingTokens(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.ExcerptTest)
Time elapsed: 0.096 sec FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:1 but was:0
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:287)
this can be seen in the oak-solr-core project, probably introduced by
OAK-1783
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote:
testMatchMultipleNonMatchingTokens(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.ExcerptTest)
Time elapsed: 0.096 sec FAILURE!
I'll fix it, thanks.
Tommaso
2014-04-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
this can be seen in the oak-solr-core project, probably introduced by
OAK-1783
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
wrote:
ignored the test for now (as far as I can see it seems to only fail on
windows)
Tommaso
2014-04-30 16:05 GMT+02:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
I'll fix it, thanks.
Tommaso
2014-04-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
this can be seen in the
It also fails on my machine :)
Should you also disable it on the 1.0 branch? AFAIKT all the changes on
that issue have been already merged.
It doesn't fail for me locally, but I can't tell about Windows machines.
alex
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili
2014-04-30 16:31 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
It also fails on my machine :)
I have just disabled it, therefore you shouldn't see it anymore, could you
open an issue with the test output / stacktrace?
Should you also disable it on the 1.0 branch? AFAIKT all the
thanks for disabling the test. I've created OAK-1786.
best,
alex
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-04-30 16:31 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
It also fails on my machine :)
I have just disabled it, therefore you
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/13
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-win7
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:37 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/16
Failed tests:
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/17
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-win7
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
21 matches
Mail list logo
