[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu updated JCRVLT-52:
--
Attachment: JCRVLT-52-1.diff
Set maven-compiler-plugin target/source version to 1.6
Robert Munteanu created JCRVLT-52:
-
Summary: Set maven-compiler-plugin target/source version to 1.6
Key: JCRVLT-52
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-52
Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu updated JCRVLT-52:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Set maven-compiler-plugin target/source version to 1.6
Maxim Zinal created OCM-68:
--
Summary: Incorrect behaviour of Filter.addOrFilter() method
Key: OCM-68
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-68
Project: Jackrabbit OCM
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Zinal updated OCM-68:
---
Description:
I've tried to use Filter.addOrFilter() method and found that it does not place
correct (expected)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Zinal updated OCM-65:
---
Description:
When trying to use ObjectContentManager.copy() service to create a copy of
JCR-OCM serialized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Zinal updated OCM-68:
---
Attachment: OCM-68.patch
This is my patch fixing the issue
Incorrect behaviour of Filter.addOrFilter() method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Zinal updated OCM-68:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.1
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Incorrect behaviour of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Zinal updated OCM-65:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.1
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
ObjectContentManager.copy() does not work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Zinal updated OCM-65:
---
Attachment: OCM-65.patch
ObjectContentManager.copy() does not work properly for objects containing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Mueller reassigned JCR-3793:
---
Assignee: Thomas Mueller
vlt: with many child nodes, NodeNameList.restoreOrder is very slow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14051514#comment-14051514
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-3793:
bq. My patch still improves performance about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Bocanegra moved JCR-3793 to JCRVLT-53:
-
Key: JCRVLT-53 (was: JCR-3793)
Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
Hi,
What kind of limitations, if any, do people see in growing an
Oak/Mongo repository to a few billion nodes?
IIRC people were doing tests with a few hundred million nodes in
Jackrabbit, so given Oak's scalable design I suppose that would work -
but do any obvious bottlenecks come to mind?
Hi,
I recently talked to someone who might be interested in reviving the
OAK-784 HBase microkernel that was contributed in April 2013.
That's based on the MicroKernel interface, is that still how you'd do
it today? I've lost track of the various ways of creating storage
backends.
-Bertrand
Angela, should this be applied to the 1.0 branch too?
alex
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:50 AM, ang...@apache.org wrote:
Author: angela
Date: Thu Jul 3 06:50:00 2014
New Revision: 1607544
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1607544
Log:
minor improvement:
Hi,
in the end MongoDB is basically the limit, as long as you have
enough storage there, you can grow your repository.
there are still some things to consider:
- oak indexes: they add more nodes to the repository. only add
indexes that are useful.
- backup/restore: at some point you will have
Hi,
it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak,
but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API:
- SegmentNodeStore aka TarMK
- DocumentNodeStore aka MongoMK
both implementations have again their own storage abstraction, which
means the
I am trying to create a custom node type using CND and registering it with
CNDImporter. If I use an existing namespace (oak, for example), the import
succeeds. If I define a new namespace, it fails with exception:
OakName0001: Invalid namespace prefix([, jcr, nt, oak, sv, xml,
Hi,
In addition to what Marcel wrote:
With the Mongo storage (and the relational database storage), you could
start multiple Oak instances and read/write the data concurrently. You
might also need to use a clustered / sharded storage backend (MongoDB or
database).
There are some limitations to
Hi Marcel,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote:
...it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak,
but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API...
Thanks! I have added a reference to this to OAK-784.
-Bertrand
On 2014-07-03 10:12, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
Hi,
it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak,
but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API:
- SegmentNodeStore aka TarMK
- DocumentNodeStore aka MongoMK
both implementations have again their own
22 matches
Mail list logo
