Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.9.1

2015-02-05 Thread fanrong, sun
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.9.1 Frank 在 2015年2月5日,04:04,Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com mailto:alex.parvule...@gmail.com 写道: +1 alex On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org mailto:dav...@apache.org wrote: [X] +1 Release

Re: [DISCUSS] Atomic Counters on cluster

2015-02-05 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I would use the index approach, at least for now. By the way, I have used the same idea for the approximate node counter mechanism (OAK-1907). A generalisation of the atomic counter problem is the atomic sum problem. For that, you don't just want to support +1 and -1, but +x and -x, possibly

[X-POST] integrationTesting on check-release

2015-02-05 Thread Davide Giannella
Hello team, cross posting as it actually affects both jackrabbit as well as oak. They both share the check-release.sh. My suggestion is to add the integrationTesting profile on the check release process to ensure a higher checks before actually providing a +1. below a suggested (not tested yet)

[X-POST] integrationTesting on check-release

2015-02-05 Thread Davide Giannella
Hello team, cross posting as it actually affects both jackrabbit as well as oak. They both share the check-release.sh. My suggestion is to add the integrationTesting profile on the check release process to ensure a higher checks before actually providing a +1. below a suggested (not tested yet)