Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.1

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.1 where [INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00) [INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos" [INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_144, vendor: Oracle

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2 where [INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00) [INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos" [INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_144, vendor: Oracle

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2 alex On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.8.2/ > > The release

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.1

+1 greets claus

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2

On 2018-02-06 13:49, Davide Giannella wrote: > ... > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2 ...where... [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; 2017-10-18T10:58:13+03:00) [INFO] OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.13.2", arch: "x86_64", family:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2

On 2018-02-06 13:49, Davide Giannella wrote: ... [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2 ...where... [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; 2017-10-18T09:58:13+02:00) [INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.1

On 2018-02-06 14:22, Julian Reschke wrote: ... [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.1 ...where... [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; 2017-10-18T09:58:13+02:00) [INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.1

A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.16.1 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.16.1/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/jackrabbit-2.16.1/ The SHA1 checksum of the archive is

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2

A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2 release is available at:     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.8.2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.8.2/ The SHA1 checksum of the

Re: svn commit: r1822884 [1/3] - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.6: ./ oak-parent/ oak-solr-core/ oak-solr-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/solr/configuration/ oak-solr-core/sr

On 2018-02-06 12:30, Julian Reschke wrote: On 2018-02-06 10:50, Amit Jain wrote: Hi Tommaso, I am getting these errors on building 1.6 which means there missing backports to 1.6. Thanks Amit Same here. svn merge . -c -r1822884 fixes the build. The change was

Re: svn commit: r1822884 [1/3] - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.6: ./ oak-parent/ oak-solr-core/ oak-solr-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/solr/configuration/ oak-solr-core/sr

On 2018-02-06 10:50, Amit Jain wrote: Hi Tommaso, I am getting these errors on building 1.6 which means there missing backports to 1.6. Thanks Amit Same here.

Re: Oak 1.8.2 release plan

Thanks everyone. Going to test and cut the release now. Refrain backports. Free to go once you see the vote email. Cheers Davide

Re: svn commit: r1822884 [1/3] - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.6: ./ oak-parent/ oak-solr-core/ oak-solr-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/solr/configuration/ oak-solr-core/sr

Hi Tommaso, I am getting these errors on building 1.6 which means there missing backports to 1.6. Thanks Amit -- [INFO]

Re: Oak 1.8.2 release plan

Backported the fix for OAK-7223 to 1.8 branch. Release is good to go from my side. Thanks Amit On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > On 31/01/2018 10:09, Davide Giannella wrote: > > We have a couple of blockers, which may require more testing. Postponing

[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-255) ImportModes act on file serialization level not on node level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tobias Bocanegra updated JCRVLT-255: Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement) > ImportModes act on file serialization level not on

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-255) ImportModes act on file serialization level not on node level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16353540#comment-16353540 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-255: - I agree that this is a bug and should be fixed

[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-255) ImportModes act on file serialization level not on node level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tobias Bocanegra updated JCRVLT-255: Fix Version/s: 3.1.44 > ImportModes act on file serialization level not on node level >

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-255) ImportModes act on file serialization level not on node level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16353532#comment-16353532 ] Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-255: [~tripod] Ping? > ImportModes act on file serialization