Hi,
On 7/21/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1.
The vote passes with the following votes (* is member of the Jackrabbit PMC):
+1 Jukka Zitting (*)
+1 Alexandre Martins
+1 Bertrand Delacretaz
+1 Stefan
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jul 27, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
If my reasoning is correct, I would treat the issue as a test case bug
to be fixed in a future release, and not a blocker to 1.3.1.
I don't consider it a blocker. I think it may have existed on 1.3.0
as well, since I re
On Jul 27, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
If my reasoning is correct, I would treat the issue as a test case bug
to be fixed in a future release, and not a blocker to 1.3.1.
I don't consider it a blocker. I think it may have existed on 1.3.0
as well, since I remember trying to test it
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
We're still lacking one binding +1 vote to make the release. It would
be nice if someone could review the release candidate and/or the test
failures Roy is seeing before Monday when I go offline for a full week
(vacationing on the coast of the Arctic Ocean). Otherwise th
Hi,
We're still lacking one binding +1 vote to make the release. It would
be nice if someone could review the release candidate and/or the test
failures Roy is seeing before Monday when I go offline for a full week
(vacationing on the coast of the Arctic Ocean). Otherwise the release
will have to
Hi,
On 7/28/07, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
> >
> >http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
>
> All sigs and hashes good. However, I am getting test failures on
> OS X 10.4.10 (PPC) with java vers
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
All sigs and hashes good. However, I am getting test failures on
OS X 10.4.10 (PPC) with java version "1.5.0_07"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5
+1 Release the packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1
successfully compiled from source and ran automated tests on w2k with java 6.
cheers
stefan
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a reason that the bundle persistence manager ddl for posgresql
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-889) was not applied to 1.3.1 ?
> Can this be slipped in ? :)
It's a feature issue and not a bug fix. I try to put on
Sorry I'm late...
Is there a reason that the bundle persistence manager ddl for posgresql
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-889) was not applied to 1.3.1 ?
Can this be slipped in ? :)
Thanks,
Florent
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1
Hi,
On 7/21/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1.
Thanks to Alexandre and Bertrand for voting! However, we still need
two +1 votes from Jackrabbit PMC members to put the release out. I
guess quite a few are on vacation
On 7/21/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(non-binding)
[X ] +1 Release the packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1
Tested what's in
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/source/ on macosx
10.4.10, java version "1.5.0_07": "mvn clean install" in
/jackrabbit-1.3.1 works, inclu
[X] +1 Release the packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1
2007/7/21, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
See the included RELEASE-NOTES.txt file for details on release
c
Hi,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
See the included RELEASE-NOTES.txt file for details on release
contents and latest changes. The release was made from the 1.3 branch
after merging in all the changes lis
14 matches
Mail list logo
