[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12895195#action_12895195 ] Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2688: Could we move the org.apache.jackrabbit.flat package

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12895226#action_12895226 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: Sorry for the miss placed packages. Flat package

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12895277#action_12895277 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: I'm basically fine with the patch. However I would

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12894855#action_12894855 ] Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2688: There's no need for the tests in jcr-commons to

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12894603#action_12894603 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: I created JCR-2692 to track the issue of splitting

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12894027#action_12894027 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-2688: --- I suggest you go with 3) We already did this

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12894054#action_12894054 ] Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-2688: (6) would probably be best and also solve

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893129#action_12893129 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: Open questions: - Currently these utility classes

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893130#action_12893130 ] Thomas Mueller commented on JCR-2688: - That about a test dependency? Provide utility

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893171#action_12893171 ] Justin Edelson commented on JCR-2688: - I would use a test dependency. Placing the tests

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893177#action_12893177 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: Maven seems to fine with jackrabbit-core as test

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893181#action_12893181 ] Justin Edelson commented on JCR-2688: - Maven seems to fine with jackrabbit-core as test

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893193#action_12893193 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: So I see four option for the unit tests: 1. Move

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893204#action_12893204 ] Alexander Klimetschek commented on JCR-2688: 1. is the right way: if jackrabbit's

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893208#action_12893208 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: Yes technically 1. is the right way... However I

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893209#action_12893209 ] Justin Edelson commented on JCR-2688: - 5. Leave the unit tests in jcr-commons and use

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2688) Provide utility for handling large number of child nodes/properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893212#action_12893212 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2688: 5. means basically reimplementing JCR... 6. is more