Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... just for my understanding: Before saving I would parse the document,
> extract all internal links and add them to a "outgoingLinks" multi-value
> property? This makes a lot of sense. We could even add t
Hi Bertrand,
Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... Find all documents containing the XPath
//a[local-name() = 'xhtml' and namespace-uri = 'http://...' and
starts-with(@href,'lenya-document:c2c38f30-ff68-11dc-9682-9dea3e
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Find all documents containing the XPath
> //a[local-name() = 'xhtml' and namespace-uri = 'http://...' and
> starts-with(@href,'lenya-document:c2c38f30-ff68-11dc-9682-9dea3e2477d4)]
> That would be typical to fin
Jukka Zitting schrieb:
[...]
- SQL query speed comparison with MySQL/PostgreSQL
- read/write comparisons with filesystems
I'm sure that Jackrabbit will lose on both of those comparisons. The
main benefit in using a JCR content repository comes not from
duplicating content structures found i
hi martin,
i would agree that it makes sense to compare different technologies in terms of
their featureset...
i agree with andreas that comparing performance beyond one specific
implementation
may be complicated. generally performance is very much subject to configuration
and relevant usecases (
Hi,
2008/3/31 Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin schrieb:
> > I've talked to my supervisor and comparison to other technologies with
> > some benchmarks could be interesting.
>
> I wonder if it is really appropriate, or even possible, to compare
> "technologies" regarding performanc
Hi Martin,
Martin schrieb:
I've talked to my supervisor and comparison to other technologies with some
benchmarks could be interesting.
I wonder if it is really appropriate, or even possible, to compare
"technologies" regarding performance. IMO the performance is rather an
aspect of the imp
I've talked to my supervisor and comparison to other technologies with some
benchmarks could be interesting.
So, the question is: what would be "the other technologies"?
Some candidates :-):
RDBMS (e.g. Oracle Database, MySQL) - probably using some ORM (JPA, Hibernate)?
WebDav
local filesystem
di
hi martin,
> Jackrabbits' competitors would be other implementations of jsr-170/jsr283
> (Alfresco, Exo etc.)
> But is there any technology competing with JCR (generally)? As far as I
> know there are only technologies that can do "some part of job" that JCR can
> do.
i think it depends
Thanks for the answer.
Jackrabbits' competitors would be other implementations of jsr-170/jsr283
(Alfresco, Exo etc.)
But is there any technology competing with JCR (generally)? As far as I know
there are only technologies that can do "some part of job" that JCR can do.
Could you post more
Hi.
I don't know if it's thesis material, but this item...
> - compare JCR to other technologies (well, are there any similar
> technologies?) and make a
> benchmark etc.
...i s something that's really needed, and asked for.
Most of us have run some benchmarks, but at least in my case they were
Hi,
First of all, if there is better place for posting this kind of question,
please point me there...
I'm thinking about writing a diploma thesis about JCR (using Apache Jackrabbit
as a reference implementation).
I have some ideas what's going to be "inside", but I would like to ask if you
kno
12 matches
Mail list logo
