"Jukka Zitting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/02/2006 04:46:28 PM:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/2/06, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > why? it's an illegal argument, since the uuid format is not valid.
> > i disagree to throw another exception. i suggest to add the
> > IllegalArgumentException
hi jukka,
On 7/2/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 7/2/06, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why? it's an illegal argument, since the uuid format is not valid.
> i disagree to throw another exception. i suggest to add the
> IllegalArgumentException to the spec/java
I agree wsith Jukka. It makes sense.
On 7/2/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 7/2/06, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why? it's an illegal argument, since the uuid format is not valid.
> i disagree to throw another exception. i suggest to add the
> IllegalArgume
Hi,
On 7/2/06, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
why? it's an illegal argument, since the uuid format is not valid.
i disagree to throw another exception. i suggest to add the
IllegalArgumentException to the spec/javadoc.
The spec never references the UUID specification or defines th
why? it's an illegal argument, since the uuid format is not valid.
i disagree to throw another exception. i suggest to add the
IllegalArgumentException to the spec/javadoc.
regards, toby
On 6/30/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 6/30/06, David Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Hi,
On 6/30/06, David Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When invoking session.getNodeByUUID and passing an invalid ID, an
IllegalArgumentException is thrown. Should this be wrapped in an
ItemNotFoundException or RepositoryException by SessionImpl?
Good point, an ItemNotFoundException would p
