[jira] Commented: (JCR-550) ObservationManagerFactory) -

2006-09-07 Thread JIRA
OutOfMemoryError when re-indexing the repository In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-550?page=3Dcomments#action_1= 2433037 ]=20 =20 Claus

Re: Nuclear Fission, Splitting the core: The SPI Effect [was: Improving the accessibility of the Jackrabbit core]

2006-09-07 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I think it's a good thing to do. Some random ideas: I don't understand why it needs to be stateless (about my understanding of stateless, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateless_server). As far as I see stateless means it's slower, and I really don't like slow ;-) Even HTTP is becoming

RE: Nuclear Fission, Splitting the core: The SPI Effect [was: Improving the accessibility of the Jackrabbit core]

2006-09-07 Thread Miro Walker
David, Agreed regarding use of client and server as terminology - I think this leads to some fuzzy thinking as the client and the application that uses the client get confused. Could we borrow from JDBC and call them the JCR Driver and JCR Server? That to me gives the right sort of thinking in

Re: getting the latest version of a checkedout node

2006-09-07 Thread J Kuijpers
I don't think so. This is actually restoring the node, so the current node is overwritten with the older version. I just want to read the latest version of a node before it was checked out. In my application users are reading nodes, the checkedout state of a node shouldn't be visable for the

Re: Nuclear Fission, Splitting the core: The SPI Effect [was: Improving the accessibility of the Jackrabbit core]

2006-09-07 Thread David Nuescheler
Hi Thomas, Thanks for your thoughtful comment. I don't understand why it needs to be stateless (about my understanding of stateless, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateless_server). As far as I see stateless means it's slower, and I really don't like slow ;-) Even HTTP is becoming more and

Re: getting the latest version of a checkedout node

2006-09-07 Thread David Nuescheler
Hi J, I think that your explanations point into the direction of multiple workspaces. If user A has a workspace A that user can make modifications in his workspace without user B in workspace B can see the changes. As soon as user A checks something into the version store user B can check it out

Re: getting the latest version of a checkedout node

2006-09-07 Thread David Nuescheler
and ;) as marcel put it: as a quick guideline: if you don't know how to achieve something ask on the user list, if you think something is wrong and doesn't work as expected use the dev list. Thank you.

[jira] Created: (JCR-564) Remove geronimo JTA as a runtime dependency

2006-09-07 Thread Michael Neale (JIRA)
Remove geronimo JTA as a runtime dependency --- Key: JCR-564 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-564 Project: Jackrabbit Issue Type: Bug Components: maven Affects Versions:

[jira] Commented: (JCR-564) Remove geronimo JTA as a runtime dependency

2006-09-07 Thread Michael Neale (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-564?page=comments#action_12433118 ] Michael Neale commented on JCR-564: --- OK, in maven 2 you can mark it as provided which means it is a compile/test time dep, but at runtime it is expected to be

Versioning bug with restore and transactions

2006-09-07 Thread Florent Guillaume
I'm posting here because at the moment I can't login to Jira (seems my account was reset or something, and forgotten password seems to send email by pigeon carrier). I have a versioning bug in the presence of transactions. It's hard to reproduce and seems memory-layout dependent. At the

Re: Object-content mapping tool in Graffito

2006-09-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 9/7/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what about the OCM Spring support ( in [Graffito trunk]/jcr/spring) ? do you plan to move it into Jackrabbit ? What do you see as the best option? It's tightly related to the OCM tool so I think it would make sense to keep them

Re: Object-content mapping tool in Graffito

2006-09-07 Thread Alexandru Popescu
On 9/8/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 9/7/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what about the OCM Spring support ( in [Graffito trunk]/jcr/spring) ? do you plan to move it into Jackrabbit ? What do you see as the best option? It's tightly related to the OCM tool