Re: Donation of Adobe's content-package-maven-plugin

Hi Stian, No :-( I was told, that this is not required for so little code. However, I will start the IP clearance nevertheless. Regards, toby On 12 September 2017 at 08:35:27, Stian Soiland-Reyes (st...@apache.org) wrote: Good idea! Have you already started IP

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-202) Import Adobe's content package maven plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16162381#comment-16162381 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-202: - reverted the commit in 1808077, due to lack of ip

[IP CLEARANCE][VOTE] FileVault Package Maven Plugin Contribution

Hi, Jackrabbit has received a donation of Adobe's FileVault Package Maven Plugin that we'd like to have as part of the contribs. the process is tracked under JCRVLT-202 and the signed source code is available here: tar:

Re: [IP CLEARANCE][VOTE] FileVault Package Maven Plugin Contribution

+1 Accept FileVault Package Maven Plugin into Apache Jackrabbit Chetan Mehrotra On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote: > [ ] +1 Accept FileVault Package Maven Plugin into Apache Jackrabbit > > > Regards, Toby

Re: Donation of Adobe's content-package-maven-plugin

On 11 September 2017 at 18:57:04, Davide Giannella (dav...@apache.org) wrote: I don't have any specific preferences but I'm wondering that as the main development effort has moved now to Oak if rather than put it under jackrabbit it would make more sense to put it under

Re: [IP CLEARANCE][VOTE] FileVault Package Maven Plugin Contribution

[ ] +1 Accept FileVault Package Maven Plugin into Apache Jackrabbit Regards, Toby

Re: Donation of Adobe's content-package-maven-plugin

Good idea! Have you already started IP Clearance [1] of the new contribution that was developed outside ASF? [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ On 8 Sep 2017 5:46 am, "Tobias Bocanegra" wrote: > Hi devs, > > tl;dr: > I'm about to contribute the

Re: Donation of Adobe's content-package-maven-plugin

Thanks! Personally I don't think 40 or so files is little code, although of course large parts of that are tests and beans so that is for the PMC to decide :-) >From a brief look at the code it looks clean, but I don't know the origin, and the IP Clearance will add a record of the contribution

Committership under a Corporate CLA

Hi, I'm filling in the IP clearance template [1] for the FileVault Package Plugin contribution by Adobe Systems as recorded in JCRVLT-202. One of the required steps is reminding active committers about their responsibilities regarding Corporate CLAs: Remind active committers that they are

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.14.3

+1 greets claus

Re: Donation of Adobe's content-package-maven-plugin

Hello Tobi, On 08/09/2017 05:45, Tobias Bocanegra wrote: > All is left to commit it somewhere. I plan to put it beside the > filevault project > at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/package-maven-plugin. > > alternatively, we could also request a git repository and only host it

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-202) Import Adobe's content package maven plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16160884#comment-16160884 ] Robert Munteanu commented on JCRVLT-202: A solution that would remove duplication is using

[jira] [Reopened] (JCRVLT-202) Import Adobe's content package maven plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tobias Bocanegra reopened JCRVLT-202: - [~rombert] that's a good idea. I will rename the plugin. > Import Adobe's content package

September report: draft for review

Hi, I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board%20Report%20September%202017 Please have a look at let me know of any omissions or corrections. I plan to submit it next Wednesday morning CET. Michael

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.14.3

On 2017-09-11 15:35, Julian Reschke wrote: ... [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.14.3 Best regards, Julian

Re: September report: draft for review

On 2017-09-11 15:54, Michael Dürig wrote: Hi, I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board%20Report%20September%202017 Please have a look at let me know of any omissions or corrections. I plan to submit it next Wednesday morning CET.

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-202) Import Adobe's content package maven plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16160812#comment-16160812 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-202: - comitted in r1807995.

Re: Donation of Adobe's content-package-maven-plugin

Hi, I committed the initial version here: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1807995 I you don’t object, I will announce the donation to the users and announce list, in about 24h. After that, I will try to cut release 1.0.0. Thanks. Regards, toby On 8 September 2017 at 13:45:45,

[jira] [Resolved] (JCRVLT-202) Import Adobe's content package maven plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tobias Bocanegra resolved JCRVLT-202. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: package-maven-plugin-1.0.0 > Import Adobe's

Re: September report: draft for review

On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 15:54 +0200, Michael Dürig wrote: > Hi, > > I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: > > https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board%20Report%20September%202017 > > Please have a look at let me know of any omissions or corrections. I > plan to submit it next

Re: September report: draft for review

Le 11/09/2017 à 15:54, Michael Dürig a écrit : Hi, I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board%20Report%20September%202017 Please have a look at let me know of any omissions or corrections. I plan to submit it next Wednesday morning

Re: September report: draft for review

Looks good to me. 2017-09-11 18:24 GMT+03:00 Cédric Damioli : > > > Le 11/09/2017 à 15:54, Michael Dürig a écrit : > >> >> Hi, >> >> I've assembled a preliminary board report for September: >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Board%20Report%20September%202017 >> >>

Re: Intended to backport OAK-6110 to 1.6

On 11/09/2017 09:05, Michael Dürig wrote: > I intend to backport OAK-6110 to Oak 1.6. See OAK-6642 for a patch. +1 D.

Intended to backport OAK-6110 to 1.6

Hi, I intend to backport OAK-6110 to Oak 1.6. See OAK-6642 for a patch. The fix is very simple and showed big performance and scalability improvements compacting repositories with nodes having many siblings. Michael

Re: Intended to backport OAK-6110 to 1.6

+1 2017-09-11 11:46 GMT+03:00 Davide Giannella : > On 11/09/2017 09:05, Michael Dürig wrote: > > I intend to backport OAK-6110 to Oak 1.6. See OAK-6642 for a patch. > +1 > D. >

Release process and staging upload

Hello team, what are the reasons we're uploading a zip binary of the sources for Oak to staging and then production? I think most, if not all, of the oak users leverage maven repositories and the zip is therefore not used. Can we skip such step, at least for Oak, and drive all the users to use

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7

A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7 release is available at:     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.7.7/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.7.7/ The SHA1 checksum of the

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 726 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #726) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/726/ to view the results. Changes: [catholicon] OAK-6544: Enable active blob deletion feature by default Enable the feature by default

Re: Release process and staging upload

On 2017-09-11 14:47, Davide Giannella wrote: Hello team, what are the reasons we're uploading a zip binary of the sources for Oak to staging and then production? I think most, if not all, of the oak users leverage maven repositories and the zip is therefore not used. Can we skip such step, at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7 2017-09-11 16:12 GMT+03:00 Davide Giannella : > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 728 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #728) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/728/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-6647: Reduce reads by RevisionGC [tomekr] OAK-6644: Use ReadOnlyNodeBuilder for

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 727 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #727) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/727/ to view the results. Changes: [tommaso] OAK-6646 - set connection timeouts in Solr index Test results: 1 tests failed.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7

On 2017-09-11 15:12, Davide Giannella wrote: ... The check release script is happy, but running mvn clean install -PintegrationTesting on Windows reliably fails, see OAK-6641 and OAK-6648. I *believe* these problems have been present in OAK 1.7.6 already, though. Best regards, Julian