[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] rombert commented on pull request #251: OAK-9208 - Log unexpected writes to the paths designated as part of a non-default mount

rombert commented on pull request #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/251#issuecomment-698269338 I assumed lazy consensus :-) and committed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] asfgit closed pull request #251: OAK-9208 - Log unexpected writes to the paths designated as part of a non-default mount

asfgit closed pull request #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/251 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] mreutegg opened a new pull request #252: OAK-9230: CachingCommitValueResolver with negative cache

mreutegg opened a new pull request #252: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/252 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] fabriziofortino opened a new pull request #253: OAK-9211: elastic dynamic boost

fabriziofortino opened a new pull request #253: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/253 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-472) Content package with principal policy fails to install when the user is in the same package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17201602#comment-17201602 ] Robert Munteanu commented on JCRVLT-472: [~kwin] - I've put it on my to-do list, but I don't see

[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] mreutegg opened a new pull request #254: OAK-9231: Enable negative cache of commit value resolver for oak-run …

mreutegg opened a new pull request #254: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/254 …index command This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] mreutegg commented on pull request #252: OAK-9230: CachingCommitValueResolver with negative cache

mreutegg commented on pull request #252: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/252#issuecomment-698437352 Slightly modified version has been committed to svn. This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] mreutegg closed pull request #252: OAK-9230: CachingCommitValueResolver with negative cache

mreutegg closed pull request #252: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/252 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: Question about the node deletion

Am 24.09.2020 um 17:56 schrieb fengiaw: Hi devs, I am working on JackRabbit Oak jcr, and have questions about the node deletion. Our backend store is using mysql. When I check the data in mysql, I can see two fields related to deletion, one is "_deleted" and the other one is "deletedOnce".

Question about the node deletion

Hi devs, I am working on JackRabbit Oak jcr, and have questions about the node deletion. Our backend store is using mysql. When I check the data in mysql, I can see two fields related to deletion, one is "_deleted" and the other one is "deletedOnce". From the documentation, "deletedOnce" only