Luca Tagliani created JCR-3440:
--
Summary: Deadlock on LOCAL_REVISION table in clustering environment
Key: JCR-3440
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3440
Project: Jackrabbit Content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luca Tagliani updated JCR-3440:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Attaching the proposed patch
Deadlock on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luca Tagliani updated JCR-2438:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Attacching proposed patch)
Multiple threads are trying to acquire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luca Tagliani updated JCR-2438:
---
Attachment: JCR-3440.patch
Attacching proposed patch
Multiple threads are trying to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luca Tagliani updated JCR-3440:
---
Attachment: JCR-3440.patch
Deadlock on LOCAL_REVISION table in clustering environment
nutan bagate created JCR-3441:
-
Summary: Error while woking with jackrabbit Repository
Key: JCR-3441
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3441
Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473113#comment-13473113
]
Julian Reschke commented on JCR-3439:
-
Proposed changes (thanks Angela):
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473137#comment-13473137
]
Geoffroy Schneck commented on JCR-3275:
---
Additional comment / enhancement proposal :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473179#comment-13473179
]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-3438:
-
Hi Nick. I think you should not mix a xa and a normal
Frank van Lankvelt created JCR-3442:
---
Summary: Allow (override) access of the system search manager to
RepositoryImpl subclasses
Key: JCR-3442
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3442
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank van Lankvelt updated JCR-3442:
Attachment: JCR-3442-system-search-access-2_4_x.patch
Allow (override) access of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank van Lankvelt updated JCR-3442:
Attachment: JCR-3442-system-search-access-2_2_x.patch
Allow (override) access of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473201#comment-13473201
]
Nick Tuckett commented on JCR-3438:
---
Hi Claus!
I think the problem still stands for my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473205#comment-13473205
]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-3438:
-
Ok i see but i think your testcase don't reflect the real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473213#comment-13473213
]
Nick Tuckett commented on JCR-3438:
---
I've had a look through XATest.java - thank you for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473215#comment-13473215
]
Nick Tuckett commented on JCR-3438:
---
By UserTransaction I mean an equivalent of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473215#comment-13473215
]
Nick Tuckett edited comment on JCR-3438 at 10/10/12 1:37 PM:
-
By
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473227#comment-13473227
]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-3438:
-
I think of course that you have a real world application.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473262#comment-13473262
]
Nick Tuckett commented on JCR-3438:
---
Many thanks, Claus. I haven't seen the article you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473275#comment-13473275
]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-3438:
-
Maybe you will also have a look at
Cédric Damioli created JCR-3443:
---
Summary: Normalize String properties when ordering query results
Key: JCR-3443
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3443
Project: Jackrabbit Content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cédric Damioli updated JCR-3443:
Attachment: normalize.patch
Attached is a first patch adding the fn:normalize XPath function
So
Hi guys,
Following on this, I've submitted a patch here :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3443
I propose a new XPath function fn:normalize which works perfectly in my
case.
I'm now awaiting your comments to know what to do with it :)
Best regards,
Cédric
Le 09/10/2012 23:00,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cédric Damioli updated JCR-3443:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Normalize String properties when ordering query results
Michael Dürig created JCR-3444:
--
Summary: Tests for which setup fails leak sessions
Key: JCR-3444
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3444
Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473852#comment-13473852
]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-3440:
-
Removing this unnecessary (to me :-) ) write to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473853#comment-13473853
]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-3206:
-
Hi Lars,
In your patch there are a lot of changes only in
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building ASF
Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/733
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Stamp:
works on my machine... just takes (too) long.
angela
On 10/10/12 2:14 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building ASF
Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/733
Buildbot URL:
On 10.10.12 16:32, mreut...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mreutegg
Date: Wed Oct 10 15:32:34 2012
New Revision: 1396646
URL:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1396646view=rev
Log:
OAK-169: Support orderable nodes
- move orderable nodes implementation from oak-jcr to oak-core
Thanks Marcel! Good
Added:
...
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-
core/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/TreeTest.java (with props)
Would these fit into TreeImplTest?
I considered that, but then decided against it because TreeImplTest doesn't
have a ContentRepository nor ContentSession. Extending from
On 10.10.12 17:12, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
Added:
...
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-
core/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/TreeTest.java (with props)
Would these fit into TreeImplTest?
I considered that, but then decided against it because TreeImplTest doesn't
have a
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/739
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
On 10.10.12 14:33, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 10.10.12 13:22, Angela Schreiber wrote:
works on my machine... just takes (too) long.
The reason for which is that since revision 1396552 the tests start to
fail with an OOME.
This is caused by tests the TCK not closing sessions for tests where
34 matches
Mail list logo