[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634889#comment-13634889
]
Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-3534:
Re. signed message or HMAC
I agree with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634903#comment-13634903
]
angela commented on JCR-3534:
-
in general it seems that we agree on creating some sort of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634903#comment-13634903
]
angela edited comment on JCR-3534 at 4/18/13 6:42 AM:
--
in general it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634905#comment-13634905
]
Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-3534:
Re. ValueFactory#createValue(String,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634929#comment-13634929
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-3534:
---
ValueFactory#createValue(String,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634931#comment-13634931
]
Julian Reschke commented on JCR-3568:
-
Ulrich, I don't understand the point about this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634968#comment-13634968
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on JCR-3534:
--
bq. As mentioned earlier, I'd rather introduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634968#comment-13634968
]
Tommaso Teofili edited comment on JCR-3534 at 4/18/13 8:01 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634973#comment-13634973
]
Sergiy Shyrkov commented on JCR-3572:
-
Do you mean the patch against trunk or against
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634974#comment-13634974
]
Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-3534:
createValue(Binary)
If we have a custom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634985#comment-13634985
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-3534:
public API
+1 for createValue(Binary), with an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13634997#comment-13634997
]
angela commented on JCR-3534:
-
fine with me.
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13635007#comment-13635007
]
Ulrich Schmidt commented on JCR-3568:
-
The method Property.getBinary() creates the temp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13635016#comment-13635016
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-3568:
But the resulting Class javax.jcr.Binary does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke reopened JCR-3568:
-
Re-opening until it's clear that there is no bug anywhere.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13635100#comment-13635100
]
Alexander Klimetschek commented on JCR-3572:
Usually things are done on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13635114#comment-13635114
]
Ulrich Schmidt commented on JCR-3568:
-
My test environment uses
Julian Reschke created JCR-3574:
---
Summary: leverage DAC 3 compliance class to use absolute paths in
Destination header field
Key: JCR-3574
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3574
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated JCR-3574:
Summary: leverage WebDAV 3 compliance class to use absolute paths in
Destination header field (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sergiy Shyrkov updated JCR-3572:
Attachment: NodeImpl-getNodes-optimization.patch
I've attached the patch against current trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke resolved JCR-3574.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.7
2.6.1
2.4.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated JCR-3574:
Summary: Leverage WebDAV compliance class 3 to use absolute paths in
Destination header field (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claus Köll updated JCR-3570:
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed in revision 1469698.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13636091#comment-13636091
]
Claus Köll commented on JCR-3570:
-
Backportet to 2.6 branch in revision 1469700.
Hi,
On 4/16/13 4:26 PM, Dominik Süß dominik.su...@gmail.com wrote:
I see some overlap with the latest work of Carsten in Sling regarding
Discovery API[0]. Since Sling typically should work uppon JCR / Oak it
might be good not to follow different patterns. For a combined solution I
do think it
25 matches
Mail list logo
