Re: [VOTE] Accept MongoMK contribution (Was: [jira] [Created] (OAK-293) MongoDB-based MicroKernel)

On 13/set/2012, at 17:09, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Philipp Marx (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: Summary: MongoDB-based MicroKernel This is a pretty major new feature so I'd like us to vote on whether we want to take over the maintenance and further

Re: New Jackrabbit committer: Tommaso Teofili

Thanks guys for your warm welcome! Looking forward to keep contributing to this community. Cheers, Tommaso On 20/feb/2013, at 15:56, Felix Meschberger wrote: Welcome and Congratulations ! Regards Felix Am 20.02.2013 um 15:43 schrieb Michael Dürig: Hi, Please welcome Tommaso

Re: New Jackrabbit committer: Cédric Damioli

Welcome from a newcomer ! Tommaso On 20/feb/2013, at 15:57, Felix Meschberger wrote: Welcome and Congratulations ! Regards Felix Am 20.02.2013 um 15:44 schrieb Michael Dürig: Hi, Please welcome Cédric Damioli as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The

Re: svn commit: r1480921 - /jackrabbit/trunk/jackrabbit-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/data/DataIdentifier.java

On 10/mag/2013, at 10:28, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:14 AM, tomm...@apache.org wrote: JCR-3534 - avoiding backward compatibility issue by adding back constructor DataIdentifier(byte[]) DataIdentifier is an internal class so there's only a very limited

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.7.1

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.7.1 Regards, Tommaso On 11/set/2013, at 14:16, Alex Parvulescu wrote: A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.7.1 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.7.1/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0

+1 Tommaso 2013/9/28 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0. [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.6.4

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.6.4 Tommaso 2013/10/8 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.6.4 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.6.4/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the

JCR JSOP serialize / deserialize

Hi all, I'm currently looking / investigating on an interoperable format for serializing / deserializing JCR nodes and I was wondering how easy it'd be (or if anything already exists) to use JSOP [1] for that. The use case would be like follows: 1. get node /a/b/c from JCR as a JSOP 2. send the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.6.5

+1 Tommaso 2013/11/28 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.6.5 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.6.5/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

Re: [DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

2014-03-11 9:00 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: if there're no other objections / comments I'll go with the last suggested approach of having oak-lucene and oak-solr not embedding anything and having the oak-fulltext bundle embedding everything needed to make Lucene and Solr

Re: New Jackrabbit committer: Davide Giannella

Welcome Davide! Tommaso 2014-06-04 15:17 GMT+02:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, Please welcome Davide Giannella as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer Davide committership based on his contributions

Re: New Jackrabbit committer: Amit Jain

welcome Amit! Regards, Tommaso 2014-08-26 22:06 GMT+02:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org: Hi, Please welcome Amit Jain as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer Amit committership based on his contributions. I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.8

+1 Tommaso 2014-10-17 7:44 GMT+02:00 Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org: A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.8 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.1.8/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.10

+1, all checks ok. Regards, Tommaso 2014-11-07 0:30 GMT+01:00 Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org: On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.10 release is available at:

adding a user having the reference string

Hi all, for a use case I'm working on I am in need of triggering a user addition to a certain group having the WeakReference string of that user. E.g. group 'foo' has its rep:members property set to an array of WeakReference : [111-111-111-111,222-222-222-222] and I'd like to be able to add the

Re: adding a user having the reference string

angela On 16/01/15 09:21, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, for a use case I'm working on I am in need of triggering a user addition to a certain group having the WeakReference string of that user. E.g. group 'foo' has its rep:members property set to an array

Re: New committer: Shashank Gupta

Welcome Shashank! Tommaso 2015-03-25 21:50 GMT+01:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org: Hi, Please welcome Shashank Gupta as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer Shashank committership based on his contributions. I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.11.2

+1 Tommaso 2015-10-26 17:14 GMT+01:00 Davide Giannella : > A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.11.2 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.11.2/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.24

+1 Tommaso 2015-09-25 9:49 GMT+02:00 Tobias Bocanegra : > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.24 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.1.24/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.40

+1 (sigs check ok, build pass) Tommaso Il giorno dom 25 giu 2017 alle ore 09:26 Tobias Bocanegra ha scritto: > here's my: > > +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.40 > > (any one else care to vote?) > > regards, toby > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:27 PM,

Re: adaptTo() 2018: Tickets now available / Start Call for Papers

sive. > > please note there is 50% discount on the regular price for apache > committers (any project), perhaps this hint is a bit hidden in our website. > > stefan > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com] > >S

Re: adaptTo() 2018: Tickets now available / Start Call for Papers

Hi Sebastian, here's my feedback: 599€ as an early bird price sounds crazy and it's all but inclusive for people not being backed by companies willing to pay the conference. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 1 feb 2018 alle ore 15:57 Stefan Seifert < sseif...@pro-vision.de> ha scritto: > Dear

Re: adaptTo() 2018: Tickets now available / Start Call for Papers

sorry, I meant to write Stefan, not Sebastian, of course. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 1 feb 2018 alle ore 17:52 Tommaso Teofili < tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi Sebastian, > > here's my feedback: 599€ as an early bird price sounds crazy and it's all > but in

Re: New Jackrabbit Committer: Mohit Kataria

Welcome to the team Mohit! Regards, Tommaso On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 08:33, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > Hi, > > Please welcome Mohit Kataria as a new committer and PMC member of > the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to > offer Mohit committership based on his

Re: New Jackrabbit Committer: Nitin Gupta

Welcome to the team Nitin! Regards, Tommaso On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 08:31, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > Hi, > > Please welcome Nitin Gupta as a new committer and PMC member of > the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to > offer Nitin committership based on his

Re: Participating on OAK Hackathon

I don't seem to have write access to the wiki but I'll be there :-) Regards, Tommaso On 17/set/2012, at 11:23, Ate Douma wrote: Hi OAK hackers again, As indicated earlier we (Hippo developers) would love to come to the OAK Hackathon next week. Looking at the wiki page [1] not many others

Re: On custom index configuration

Hi all, On 19/set/2012, at 22:47, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: Hi, Just wanted to bring up how this all relates to custom index solutions (like Solr/ES). Isnt there a risk that by making it possible to attach such configuration to nodes, that it would encourage applications that make it

Re: question on custom indexes

, Tommaso Regards, Thomas On 1/24/13 10:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili teof...@adobe.com wrote: Hi all, maybe that's a silly question but I wonder what is currently considered the best practice for where to create index nodes. Do they all have to (or _should_) be under a same (e.g. query:index

Oak over HTTP guidelines

Hi all, I'm trying to access an Oak repository over HTTP as explained at [1] so I assumed I had to use oak-run as explained at [2]. If I try with curl: curl -d foo=bar http://localhost:8080/test I get: html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1/ titleError 500

Re: Oak over HTTP guidelines

this helps, Tommaso On 25/gen/2013, at 12:51, Tommaso Teofili wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to access an Oak repository over HTTP as explained at [1] so I assumed I had to use oak-run as explained at [2]. If I try with curl: curl -d foo=bar http://localhost:8080/test I get: html head meta http

Re: commit hooks and indexing

On 15/feb/2013, at 08:11, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: However, there is a difference depending on whether the index is stored in content or external. For the former case using commit hooks is the right thing to do. In

Re: svn commit: r1448559 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-solr-core/pom.xml

thanks Jukka, you beat me on this :-) Tommaso 2013/2/21 ju...@apache.org Author: jukka Date: Thu Feb 21 09:18:00 2013 New Revision: 1448559 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1448559 Log: OAK-646: Commit Oak Solr modules to Oak trunk Exclude the jms dependency not found on the central Maven

Re: One hook to rule them all

Hi Jukka, On 22/feb/2013, at 08:44, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, We currently have half a dozen different commit hooks looking at each commit. This means that each content diff is traversed at least half a dozen times before the commit can be completed. As Thomas noted, this causes a lot of

Re: Large flat commit problems

On 26/feb/2013, at 11:12, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote: Large transactions: I think we didn't define this as a strict requirement. It's probably not the most important thing for Oak to achieve, but we did list it as a

Re: commit hooks and indexing

On 27/feb/2013, at 10:25, Michael Dürig wrote: On 15.2.13 9:27, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Tommaso Teofili teof...@adobe.com wrote: maybe it would be nice to explicitly design the synchronous / asynchronous execution of an hook An Observer

Re: Using DirectMemory as second level cache

On 08/lug/2013, at 12:54, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: Hi, I tried to integrate Apache DirectMemory as Second level cache (L2). It uses Kryo [2] for serializing/derserializing objects from the off heap memory managed by DirectMemory. Initial test based on this show quite a bit of saving in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.9

+1 Tommaso On 16/set/2013, at 11:44, Alex Parvulescu wrote: A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.9 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.9/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

Re: svn commit: r1524928 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/jackrabbit-oak/

Yes, definitely an accident, sorry (IDEs are evil)! Regards, Tommaso On 20/set/2013, at 11:00, Alex Parvulescu wrote: hmm, this looks like an accident commit :) alex On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:55 AM, tomm...@apache.org wrote: Author: tommaso Date: Fri Sep 20 07:55:41 2013 New

Re: svn commit: r1524928 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/jackrabbit-oak/

it's fixed now, sorry for the noise. Tommaso 2013/9/20 Tommaso Teofili teof...@adobe.com Yes, definitely an accident, sorry (IDEs are evil)! Regards, Tommaso On 20/set/2013, at 11:00, Alex Parvulescu wrote: hmm, this looks like an accident commit :) alex On Fri, Sep 20, 2013

Re: Full text indexing with Solr

Hi Chetan, I think that currently the complete binary is sent and the on the Solr side you have the ability to choose which field to use for indexing and searching properties of Binary type via the OakSolrConfiguration#getFieldNameFor(Type? propertyType) [1] method. Currently the default

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.10

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.10 Tommaso 2013/10/3 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.10 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.10/ The release candidate is a zip archive of

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk

It should be fine now. Tommaso 2013/10/10 build...@apache.org The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/3405 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for

Difference between CommitHook and Editor

Hi all, I'm a bit lost about how validation / editing of content to-be-persisted is done. What's exactly the difference and the intended usage scenarios for CommitHooks and Editors ? I see for example EditorHook is a CommitHook but uses an EditorProvider which returns an Editor when the

Re: Difference between CommitHook and Editor

of documentation. regards angela On 10/15/13 3:48 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: Nice summary Jukka! How about adding this to oak-doc? Michael On 15.10.13 3:35 , Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Detecting move operations in node state diffs

From the user point of view I think this makes sense and it'd be worth the effort, also it looks like the global space approach would allow to do that without loosing too much in terms of performance. My 2 cents, Tommaso 2013/10/17 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org Hi, Currently we can't

writing a new MK, guidelines

Hi all, out of curiosity, I was wondering if there's any guideline other than following the API on writing a new MK implementation. What one should start with, design concepts, experience on known dos, donts, caveats, etc. In the past I wanted to play with it a bit but never had time to do

Re: writing a new MK, guidelines

implementation [2] cheers stefan [1] http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RepositoryMicroKernel [2] http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RepositoryMicroKernel?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=MicroKernel+Revision+Model.pdf On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com

Re: Question about Oak search/query.

Hi all, 2013/12/6 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote: Will the search index contain access control information or will the search results be filtered as each result is retrieved ? The results will be filtered after

Re: Question: In Repository Index file.

2013/12/6 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com Hi, On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote: In Oak when a index is stored in the repository, how is it updated when the

Re: Question about Oak search/query.

Hi, 2013/12/6 Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk Hi, On 6 December 2013 16:12, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, 2013/12/6 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote: Will the search index contain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.15

+1 Tommaso 2014/1/22 Alex Parvulescu alexparvule...@apache.org Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.15 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.15/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

Re: EditorProvider after Oak construction

Hi all, I'm a bit lost about how the plugin registration is (or should be) done. I assume the goal here is to be able to register whatever Oak plugin (Editor, IndexEditor, etc.) regardless of how Oak is initialized or at least having that possible by default and I understood the idea was to

Re: Make Whiteboard accessible through ContentRepository

+1 I think it makes sense, see also [1]. Regards, Tommaso [1] : http://markmail.org/message/4youjqpyjvajcttr 2014-02-08 Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org: Hi, currently there is not way to access the whiteboard from within the content repository - only if it's added from the outside to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.16

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.16 Regards, Tommaso 2014-02-06 10:25 GMT+01:00 Alex Parvulescu alexparvule...@apache.org: A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.16 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.16/ The release

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk

oak-blob/pom.xml was referencing the wrong parent, fixed in r1570487. Tommaso 2014-02-20 19:04 GMT+01:00 build...@apache.org: The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at:

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk

right, sorry my bad, I'll fix that. Tommaso 2014-02-24 11:08 GMT+01:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org: On 24.2.14 11:02 , Alex Parvulescu wrote: This doesn't look like something I did: Failed tests: org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.solr.configuration.

Re: svn commit: r1572903 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-jcr/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/jcr/ConcurrentAddReferenceTest.java

awesome commit message Alex :) Tommaso 2014-02-28 11:20 GMT+01:00 alexparvule...@apache.org: Author: alexparvulescu Date: Fri Feb 28 10:20:03 2014 New Revision: 1572903 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1572903 Log: OAK-1472 ConcurrentAddReferenceTest#addReferences still fails - enabling

Re: why do we index 'rep%3AGrantACE' ?

involved this time ;-) regards angela On 05/03/14 08:19, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: also as far as I could see just yesterday, rep:AccessControllable is searched when logging in (I was logging into Felix WebConsole on a system running Sling and Oak and the query

How to avoid nodes to be indexed

Hi all, for my Solr (indexing) resiliency use case [1] I've implemented an extension of Solr client which is able to cache requests if Solr goes down and execute them back once the Solr instance comes back. Now if the repository goes down during the Solr downtime we loose the cached requests as

Re: How to avoid nodes to be indexed

Hi, 2014-03-06 15:46 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: for my Solr (indexing) resiliency use case [1] I've implemented an extension of Solr client which is able to cache requests if Solr

Re: How to avoid nodes to be indexed

Hi Davide, 2014-03-06 15:43 GMT+01:00 Davide Giannella giannella.dav...@gmail.com: Hello Tommaso, On 06/03/2014 14:32, Tommaso Teofili wrote: Hi all, for my Solr (indexing) resiliency use case [1] I've implemented an extension of Solr client which is able to cache requests if Solr

[DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

Hi all, The main issue we currently have with our full text indexers is that Lucene and Solr are not OSGi ready, missing proper MANIFEST entries so that they cannot directly be installed in e.g. Apache Felix, don't have semantic version information, etc. Currently oak-lucene embeds the Lucene

Re: [DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

) would not be usable in non OSGi env a user would have to add such jars in addition to the one embedded thus adding to size would inlining the jars solve the problem and / or are there any drawbacks in inlining? Thanks, Tommaso Chetan Mehrotra On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Tommaso Teofili

Re: [DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

2014-03-10 17:15 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote: Reason for not embedding the Lucene and Solr related dependencies in Oak bundles is to enable usage of same bundle jars in non OSGi env

Re: [DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

ah ok, thanks for clarifying. Regards, Tommaso 2014-03-10 18:10 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: ok, so (in OSGi env) we would have oak-solr and oak-fulltext as fragments of oak-lucene

Re: [DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: ah ok, thanks for clarifying. Regards, Tommaso 2014-03-10 18:10 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: ok, so (in OSGi env) we would have oak

Re: [DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

In https://github.com/tteofili/jackrabbit-oak/blob/oak-1475c/oak-solr-osgi/pom.xmlI've specialized the above approach only for Solr. Tommaso 2014-03-12 16:40 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: 2014-03-12 12:29 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: 2014

Re: [DISCUSS] - OSGi deployment for Oak Lucene / Solr indexers

://github.com/tteofili/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-1475c and then we can switch to the full OSGi way once Lucene and Solr properly support it. Regards, Tommaso 2014-03-12 17:15 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: In https://github.com/tteofili/jackrabbit-oak/blob/oak-1475c/oak-solr-osgi

Re: jackrabbit-oak build #3925: Broken

that's a Solr error, of course not related to Julian's commit, I'll have a look however it seems related to a test deleting index data while another test is not finished yet, I'll look into it. Tommaso 2014-03-28 14:37 GMT+01:00 Travis CI ju...@apache.org: Build Update for

Re: Failing tests

Hi Davide, I'm looking into the Solr one. Regards, Tommaso 2014-03-31 10:55 GMT+02:00 Davide Giannella giannella.dav...@gmail.com: Hello everyone, I think all of us is aware of those but I have a fairly consistent failing test (first one at the end) and a more randomly failing one. Did

Re: svn commit: r1582706 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-solr-core: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/solr/index/ src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/solr/query

it should be fine now (as of r1583322). Tommaso 2014-03-31 13:37 GMT+02:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: disabling it for now while investigating. Tommaso 2014-03-31 12:36 GMT+02:00 Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de: On 2014-03-28 16:13, Julian Reschke wrote: On 2014

Re: jackrabbit-oak build #3994: Broken

ignored the test for now (r1584015) Tommaso 2014-04-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com: Test case failure on oak-solr Failed tests: testOffsetAndLimit(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest): expected:1 but was:0

Re: problems logging into repository.apache.org

no idea, but I guess it may be related to yesterday's SVN outage, which was caused by LDAP issues [1] ... maybe worth asking to infra@a.o Tommaso [1] : https://twitter.com/infrabot/status/451726976794263552 2014-04-04 9:48 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm having

Re: Slow full text query performance and Lucene Index handling in Oak

2014-04-09 13:44 GMT+02:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote: ... the testcase only fetches the first result. Is that a common use case? To better simulate a normal usage scenario I'd make the

Re: Slow full text query performance and Lucene Index handling in Oak

I'm looking into the Lucene codecs right now. Tommaso 2014-04-09 15:20 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com: Profiling the result shows that quite a bit of time goes in org.apache.lucene.codecs.compressing.LZ4.decompress() (40%). This I think is part of Lucene 4.x and not

Re: Review currently exported package version for 1.0 release

Hi Chetan, oak-solr-osgi should export the same packages exported by oak-solr-core, to me the list looks good. Regards, Tommaso 2014-04-17 13:01 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com: Hi Team, As part of OAK-1741 [1] I have captured details about current exported packages

Re: failure in ExcerptTest

I'll fix it, thanks. Tommaso 2014-04-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com: this can be seen in the oak-solr-core project, probably introduced by OAK-1783 On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:

Re: failure in ExcerptTest

ignored the test for now (as far as I can see it seems to only fail on windows) Tommaso 2014-04-30 16:05 GMT+02:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: I'll fix it, thanks. Tommaso 2014-04-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com: this can be seen in the oak

Re: failure in ExcerptTest

the changes on that issue have been already merged. It doesn't fail for me locally, but I can't tell about Windows machines. on 1.0 that test suite is not enabled therefore it should not fail :) Tommaso alex On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.comwrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0 Tommaso 2014-05-11 21:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org: On 9.5.14 4:07 , Jukka Zitting wrote: [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0 Michael

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

the index via cost / index plans (but maybe that's only me), implementations can be then adjusted accordingly if needed. Regards, Tommaso [1] : http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query.html#Native_Queries Regards, Thomas On 26/05/14 10:25, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

ok, thanks Davide for the pointers. Regards, Tommaso 2014-06-18 13:36 GMT+02:00 Davide Giannella giannella.dav...@gmail.com: On 18/06/2014 10:26, Tommaso Teofili wrote: it would be ok for me to either deprecate it or improve the semantics of the cost calculation (e.g. explicitly introduce

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

Hi, 2014-06-18 13:44 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com: Hi, QueryIndex.getCost my doubt is what this heuristic function to estimate the traversed entries should look like in general Relational databases typically know the number of entries in the index (total indexed entries),

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

Hi, 2014-06-18 16:02 GMT+02:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: should we just return the number of estimated entries for the cost? Yes, that's what I think the contract should be. ok, that's

Item#refresh vs Session#refresh

Hi all, While going through some logs of a repository using Oak I did found a bunch of warns like this: 11.07.2014 15:10:58.788 *WARN* [qtp1450933858-233] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl Item#refresh invokes Session#refresh! My question is: does this pose any possible performance

Re: How to implement a queue in Oak?

I don't yet have a proper proposal, but maybe what could be done may be something similar to what Davide has done with regards to the ordered index (using a skiplist), that is defining a specific structure of the nodes, together with a specific implementation, that avoids having to use sortable

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.4

+1 Regards, Tommaso 2014-08-01 11:45 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com: A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.4 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.4/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

[DISCUSS] supporting faceting in Oak query engine

Hi all, since this has been asked every now and then [1] and since I think it's a pretty useful and common feature for search engine nowadays I'd like to discuss introduction of facets [2] for the Oak query engine. Pros: having facets in search results usually helps filtering (drill down) the

Re: [DISCUSS] supporting faceting in Oak query engine

think so :) Any suggestions and / or feedback would be highly welcome, especially from potential users of this feature so that we properly tackle your requirements (if any). Thanks and regards, Tommaso Thanks! Laurie On 8/25/14 7:08 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.5

+1 Tommaso 2014-08-26 8:42 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com: A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.5 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.5/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

Re: [DISCUSS] supporting faceting in Oak query engine

! Laurie On 8/25/14 7:08 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, since this has been asked every now and then [1] and since I think it's a pretty useful and common feature for search engine nowadays I'd like to discuss introduction of facets [2] for the Oak

Re: AggregateIndex and AdvanceQueryIndex

2014-09-23 13:31 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com: Hi Thomas, On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote: Index plans need to be wrapped as well. If there is only one sub-index, then it's easy: just wrap the plans from the sub-index. If there

ObservationManager's userData in Oak

Hi all, in the context of Sling [1][2] I am evaluating the possibility of using the ObservationManager#setUserData [3] as a way to signal which Sessions generated certain events in order to filter some having specific userData. I don't have the whole background about how userData is supported in

Re: ObservationManager's userData in Oak

Tommaso, Unfortunately Oak has only limited support for user data as it cannot preserve commit boundaries in all cases (e.g. commits from other cluster nodes). See also http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/differences.html# Observation Michael On 3.10.14 5:00 , Tommaso Teofili wrote: Hi all

Re: ObservationManager's userData in Oak

missed that piece of information from the linked page, where did you get that? Regards, Tommaso Can anyone more knowledgeable address that point? Thanks, -Rob -Original Message- From: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 2:32 AM

Re: AggregateIndex and Solr

Hi Chetan, I think no. 1 is definitely the best, also Solr doesn't support aggregation at the moment, so it'd be a good change to do that. Regards, Tommaso 2014-10-08 11:17 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com: For OAK-2119 I had modified AggregateIndex to implement

Re: Features to be supported while enabling boost support in Lucene Full text index

Hi Chetan, first of all thanks for all your great work on this. I generally agree with you that we need to be on par with JR2 in terms of capabilities. Looking in more detail into the index configuration what about the following format: indexRules : {

Re: Features to be supported while enabling boost support in Lucene Full text index

2014-11-05 13:42 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com: On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote: the your configuration proposal we'd now have three different places where a property can be specified: - includePropertyNames - properties

Re: Approaches around customizing analyzer in Oak Lucene

Hi Chetan, overall I prefer B, but that would be not a trivial effort and it looks like reinventing what ES (and Solr) already have in that area. However, also given that, I think A and C would be very tricky to solve in OSGi, I have dealt myself with this topic before 1.0 and there was no clean

Re: Approaches around customizing analyzer in Oak Lucene

Hi Chetan, 2014-11-06 10:23 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com: Hi Tommaso, On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: I think A and C would be very tricky to solve in OSGi, I have dealt myself with this topic before 1.0

  1   2   3   >