+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1 on deprecating.
our stopper of removing it is JCR-4954
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
Claus
+1
greets
Claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
Ok i understand the function of shading the lucene packages
but that brings me not really to a newer lucene version in jackrabbit-core.
We are only using jackrabbit itself and do not have an newer lucene version
in our application or do you think to index the content with a newer lucene
Hi Cédric
>As a workaround, I shadowed the Lucene's 3.6 lib by changing its package
>name, so that it may get along with a more recent version.
>And then after a while, I moved toward a Solr server, and then had not
>the need of shadowing anymore, so I put back the original 3.6 lib.
Can you
You are right it was requested years ago .. I think it's work but not
impossible .. hopefully :-)
Maybe i do not understand your idea .. What ist the plan with a shaded jar file
?
How would it help to upgrade to a newer version ?
thanks
claus
>I understand what you'd like to do, but there's a
Hi !
If i understand you right i have not the problem to use 2 different versions of
lucene in the same project.
My goal is to update the lucene library in jackrabbit itself.
This means also maybe a migration path or a rebuild (that would be ok for me
personally) to a newer lucene index inside
Hi @ all..
I hope some "old" jackrabbit developers will participate to this dicussion.
We are using jackrabbit as a plain dms over years now. It is a central
component in our infrastructure and we are really satisfiying with it.
We are not planning to migrate to jackrabit oak as we have no
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
[ERROR] An internal error occurred
java.lang.Exception: Problem writing resource
WEB-INF/lib/cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs-3.0.12.jar
Caused by: java.io.IOException: No space left on device
Should we contact the infra team ?
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.resc...@gmx.de]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Oktober 2017 10:32
An: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.15.7
On 2017-10-22 10:30, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
[X] +1 Release
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
Hi Clay !
Thank you for your answer but i'm talking about jackrabbit .. not oak ;-)
greets
claus
Hi !
First .. good new year to the whole community !
We have in one of our workspace a lot of office documents (about 10 Million)
which are full text indexed.
At the moment we have searches that take really long .. 1~3 Minutes ...
The following xpath query will be executed ..
"//element(*,
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
This sounds really strange.
We know that Jackrabbit has performance impacts on heavy write load.
Can you provide more information's about how many save operations occur ..
The GLOBAL_REVISION Table is used a lock in a clustered environment
so its ok to have locks there but so long ...
greets
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
Hi !
Yes of course if all nodes have the same content you can copy the index.
You should stop the nodes before you copy the index ...
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
+1
greets
claus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Davide Giannella [mailto:dav...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. April 2016 15:57
An: dev
Betreff: Deprecation of 2.2.x plan
Good afternoon team,
we've not been touching our 2.2.x branch of Jackrabbit since 2012 and I
feel it's now
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
