Hi,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
> A (new :-) candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0 release is available
> at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.0.0/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
> https://svn.
+1
Tommaso
2013/9/28 Jukka Zitting
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Tobias Bocanegra
> wrote:
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault
> 3.0.0.
>
> [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0
>
> Looks good to me! The only thi
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0.
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0
Looks good to me! The only things you should add before pushing the
release out are the
A (new :-) candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.0.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.0.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/tags/3.0.0/
The SHA1 checks
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
>> Thanks Ate for the close look. I'll cancel the release and fix those issues.
>
> You may want to take a look at the "apache-release" profile
> definitions in the main Jackr
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
> Thanks Ate for the close look. I'll cancel the release and fix those issues.
You may want to take a look at the "apache-release" profile
definitions in the main Jackrabbit and Oak POMs. There we have some
extra tooling that replaces
Thanks Ate for the close look. I'll cancel the release and fix those issues.
Regards, Toby
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> I'm +1 (not-binding) on this release.
>
> There are a few comments I'd like to give however:
>
> - The RELEASE_NOTES.txt indicates JCR-3670 has already be
I'm +1 (not-binding) on this release.
There are a few comments I'd like to give however:
- The RELEASE_NOTES.txt indicates JCR-3670 has already been resolved, but this
is not the case.
- There are two files for LICENSE and LICENSE.txt and for NOTICE and NOTICE.txt.
These files do not contain
A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.0.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.0.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/tags/vault-reactor-3.0.0/
T
