Re: Naming convention for unstable releases
2017-10-17 10:58 GMT+03:00 Robert Munteanu : > If we go through with this, I'd to with something less scary that > experimental. Maybe '-dev' or '-unstable'? > > +1 to Robert's point above as well.
Re: Naming convention for unstable releases
On 17/10/2017 08:58, Robert Munteanu wrote: > I'm +0 on such a change as I would expect users to actually read the > fine web pages at [1]. > > If we go through with this, I'd to with something less scary that > experimental. Maybe '-dev' or '-unstable'? +1 for Robert's points therefore is a +0 for me about the name change. D.
Re: Naming convention for unstable releases
On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 07:28 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > Should we consider to label them accordingly in the future? Such as > >1.9.0-EXPERIMENTAL I'm +0 on such a change as I would expect users to actually read the fine web pages at [1]. If we go through with this, I'd to with something less scary that experimental. Maybe '-dev' or '-unstable'? Robert [1]: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/downloads.html
Re: Naming convention for unstable releases
+1 for any qualifier indicating "unstable" releases. Regards Julian On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi there, > > everybody over here knows that odd-numbered releases are unstable, taken > from trunk. > > However, apparently not all of our users know that. > > Should we consider to label them accordingly in the future? Such as > > 1.9.0-EXPERIMENTAL > > instead of > > 1.9.0 > > ? > > Best regards, Julian > > (cc'ing jackrabbit-dev because we'd want to be consistent)
Naming convention for unstable releases
Hi there, everybody over here knows that odd-numbered releases are unstable, taken from trunk. However, apparently not all of our users know that. Should we consider to label them accordingly in the future? Such as 1.9.0-EXPERIMENTAL instead of 1.9.0 ? Best regards, Julian (cc'ing jackrabbit-dev because we'd want to be consistent)
