Re: [VOTE] Apache JMeter TLP

2011-10-13 Thread Peter Lin
iately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache JMeter Project: > >  * Sebastian Bazley (sebb AT a.o) >  * Milamber (milamber AT a.o) >  * Peter Lin (woolfel AT a.o) >  * Henri Yandell (bayard AT a.o) >  * Rahul Akolkar (rahul AT a.o) >

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 2.5.1 RC3

2011-09-30 Thread Peter Lin
+1 On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:47 AM, sebb wrote: > On 29 September 2011 21:37, Philippe Mouawad > wrote: >> Hello Milamber, All, >> Thank you Milamber for your release and "thanks" message.. >> >> I may have a bad news regarding release. >> Working on new issue >> https://issues.apache.org/bugz

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 2.5.1 RC2

2011-09-25 Thread Peter Lin
+1 On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Milamber wrote: > Hello, > > The second release candidate for JMeter 2.5.1 has been prepared, and your > votes are solicited. > > This release fixes mainly some bugs appeared since JMeter 2.5, but > contains few improvements. > > Tests (load tests or functional

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 2.5.1 RC1

2011-09-22 Thread Peter Lin
+1 On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Milamber wrote: > Hello, > > The first release candidate for JMeter 2.5.1 has been prepared, and your > votes are solicited. > > This release fixes mainly some bugs appeared since JMeter 2.5, but > contains few improvements. > > Tests (load tests or functional

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 2.5 RC3

2011-08-14 Thread Peter Lin
+1 On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Milamber wrote: > Hello, > > The third release candidate for JMeter 2.5 has been prepared, and your > votes are solicited. > > JMeter is a Java desktop application designed to load test functional > behavior and measure performance. The current version is tar

Re: nightlies vs release: two files

2011-04-14 Thread Peter Lin
Plus, if you're mobile, connection could be slow Sent from my iPhone On Apr 14, 2011, at 8:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 14 April 2011 16:14, Peter Lynch wrote: >> I'm trying to understand why the nightlies have a _bin.zip and _lib.zip >> instead of just a single .zip like the official 2.4 release d

Re: [JMeter] JUnit sampler sample time changes

2011-04-03 Thread Peter Lin
|S-N|:0 S:1983959 N:1983959 > @:2040 |S-N|:1 S:2044077 N:2044078 > @:2100 |S-N|:0 S:2104195 N:2104195 > @:2160 |S-N|:0 S:2164313 N:2164313 > @:2220 |S-N|:1 S:2224430 N:2224431 > @:2280 |S-N|:1 S:2284548 N:2284549 > @:2340 |S-N|:0 S:2344666 N:2344666 > @:2400 |S-N|:1 S:2404784 N:240

Re: [JMeter] JUnit sampler sample time changes

2011-04-03 Thread Peter Lin
Another important thing to consider is that nano time costs a lot more than System.currentTimeMillis(). I've done some benchmarking in the past and nano time costs 30% on windows. On linux, the cost is higher due to differences in how it's implemented. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:28 AM, sebb wrote:

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

2010-11-26 Thread Peter Lin
> wrote: >> > On Nov 25, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Peter Lin wrote: >> > >> >> even though I haven't been active in jmeter in a while, I am still a >> >> jmeter committer. >> >> >> > >> > Quantify "a while". >> &g

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

2010-11-25 Thread Peter Lin
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Peter Lynch wrote: > Peter Lin, > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Peter Lin wrote: > >> so far I am not convinced of the benefits of changing to maven. >> >> my vote is still -1 >> >> As I said before, my f

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

2010-11-25 Thread Peter Lin
send patches and add features. > > Honestly do we expect the majority of potential developers to run for the > hills and the project to die if JMeter project is built with Maven? > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Peter Lin wrote: > >> even though I haven't been

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

2010-11-25 Thread Peter Lin
ance over head. Will moving to maven reduce maintenance cost below zero? On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote: > On Nov 25, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Peter Lin wrote: > >> even though I haven't been active in jmeter in a while, I am still a >> jmeter committer.

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

2010-11-25 Thread Peter Lin
he Foundation (supposedly) adheres to. > > If you are really casting a veto on peter's initiative stand up and present a > viable counter-argument.  If you don't I do believe the the community should > disregard you previous email. > > Tim O'Brien > > > On Nov

Re: [JMeter] Convert to Maven based build?

2010-11-25 Thread Peter Lin
I hate maven and it sucks. It does not reduce maintenance at all. I vote against changing to maven. -1 Maven is a road to he'll on my book Sent from my iPhone On Nov 25, 2010, at 1:28 PM, sebb wrote: > On 25 November 2010 17:54, Peter Lynch wrote: >> Hi sebb, >> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 a

Re: New JMeter Skin

2010-11-02 Thread Peter Lin
mike stover and I toyed with this idea a few years back, but didn't have time. I always felt it would be nice to have, but I haven't had time to contribute to jmeter the last few years. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Joe Rice wrote: > Hi, > > I have been an avid JMeter user / fan for years.  

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 2.4 based on RC3

2010-07-08 Thread Peter Lin
+1 peter On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, sebb AT ASF wrote: > Please can I have votes for the release of JMeter 2.4? > > Archives/hashes/sigs and RAT report: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.4_RC3/dist > > MD5 hashes of archives for this vote: > > 01ac101b161643a77267baec99b3acfe *jak

Re: [JMeter] Contribution to research

2010-05-26 Thread Peter Lin
several years back Mike Stover and I worked on a detailed tutorial on writing plugins for JMeter. Having a list of the classes is a good thing to have, but I personally find tutorials more useful. The old tutorial is in the jmeter resources. peter On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Alberto Bacc