Re: StoreConnection release

2012-06-09 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 09/06/12 21:00, Laurent Pellegrino wrote: Hi Andy, May I ask why do you want to do this? Briefly, I have some tests that have to use a persistent TDB instance and that are ending before to handle all the active transactions because they are not aware of all the transactions which have been

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-252) ConcurrentModificationException as a result of fixing JENA-250

2012-06-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-252. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: TDB 0.9.1 Assignee: Andy Seaborne StoreConnection no

Re: StoreConnection release

2012-06-09 Thread Laurent Pellegrino
Hi Andy, > May I ask why do you want to do this? Briefly, I have some tests that have to use a persistent TDB instance and that are ending before to handle all the active transactions because they are not aware of all the transactions which have been registered. In that case, TDB files cannot be

Re: StoreConnection release

2012-06-09 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 09/06/12 15:03, Laurent Pellegrino wrote: Hello, I have some questions about StoreConnection: 1) There is no public method to force a release. Is there a reason for not having a public release(Location location, boolean force) method that calls expel(location, true)? The "force" mode ignor

StoreConnection release

2012-06-09 Thread Laurent Pellegrino
Hello, I have some questions about StoreConnection: 1) There is no public method to force a release. Is there a reason for not having a public release(Location location, boolean force) method that calls expel(location, true)? 2) A call to release throws an exception if there is still some active

Re: Release 2.7.1

2012-06-09 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 08/06/12 23:05, Simon Helsen wrote: that seems to work. Is that confirmation JENA-250 is working OK now the concurrency clash (JENA-252) is addressed? Andy

Re: slower query

2012-06-09 Thread Andy Seaborne
(unlinked from unrelated thread) Thanks for pointing that out. It's a side effect of fixing two bug with filters, one in groups, one was an over aggressive (= wrong) placement - the bugs do not affect the results of your example query. PREFIX jfs: CONS

Re: Release 2.7.1

2012-06-09 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 08/06/12 23:05, Simon Helsen wrote: that seems to work. So the lock attribute is useless now. I am not entirely sure why this fixes things since I cannot see anyone else synchronizing on sConn, but I assume that happens somewhere outside. Each StoreConnection has a TransactionManager, and T

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-252) ConcurrentModificationException as a result of fixing JENA-250

2012-06-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292306#comment-13292306 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-252: It's not the best way to fix the problem but it is