[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Vesse reassigned JENA-266:
--
Assignee: Rob Vesse
> MINUS operations too slow
> -
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398225#comment-13398225
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-266:
Patch looks good (have only eyeballed it so far) - will go
Thanks for letting me know. I put it in as issue #266.
Paul
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Hey Paul
>
> Unfortunately the list strips attachments (sorry - apache thing, not under
> our control)
>
> Would you mind opening a JIRA for this and attach the patch there? Please
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Gearon updated JENA-266:
-
Attachment: arq.patch
Patch against jena-arq
> MINUS operations too slow
> ---
Paul Gearon created JENA-266:
Summary: MINUS operations too slow
Key: JENA-266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-266
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Improvement
Component
Hey Paul
Unfortunately the list strips attachments (sorry - apache thing, not under
our control)
Would you mind opening a JIRA for this and attach the patch there? Please
remember to check the box that says you agree to license it to the ASF
Cheers,
Rob
On 6/20/12 5:05 PM, "Paul Gearon" wr
Hi,
I finally got to writing those tests, which I forwarded on to the
SPARQL WG. I'm glad I did, as I'd missed an edge case. :-)
Please find my patch for jena-arq included. I don't know how well I've
stuck to Jena standards in naming/packaging/etc, though I tried to
copy the style. I'm happy to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne closed JENA-260.
--
> TDB Transactional error logged by Fuseki server for all update operations
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-260.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> TDB Transactional error logged by Fuseki server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13397701#comment-13397701
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-260:
Thanks for the report.
> TDB Trans
I was actually talking to Marco about this at SemTech and he was also
showing me some of the stuff they've been doing themselves with column
stores.
Essentially the approach seems to be use a row per subject and then have
the column names be predicates and the values be the objects. In DB2 at
lea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13397639#comment-13397639
]
Alex Hall commented on JENA-260:
Everything appears to be working fine with the latest build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13397554#comment-13397554
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-265:
PS sparql.org is now up-to-date so you can test the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne closed JENA-265.
--
> BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to "unexpected …" error
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13397552#comment-13397552
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-264:
Which version is this?
fuseki-server --mem --updat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13397542#comment-13397542
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-265:
Sorry - the SPARQL implementation is ahead of the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-265:
--
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to "unexpected …" error
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-265.
Resolution: Not A Problem
> BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to "unexpected …" error
>
On 20/06/12 10:34, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
2012/6/20 Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
wrote:
What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
+1, it sounds very good Reto.
I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called
"linked data",
On 20/06/12 09:23, Ian Dickinson wrote:
Thanks Andy. By re-ordering actions and the transactions in my code,
I've resolved the root problem.
I know you said you're hoping to remove this restriction on models and
transactions at some point via view graphs, but in the meantime would it
be worth ad
Semantic Web certainly doesn't address semantics in the sense fields
such as linguistics, semiotics or psychology do. that will take
another couple of decades to come to fruition.
But the Semantic Web as a name, and just that, works just fine. The
W3C continues to describe the Semantic Web as a we
thanks Andy,
I see the reason and it makes sense
Simon
From:
Andy Seaborne
To:
dev@jena.apache.org
Date:
06/20/2012 02:57 AM
Subject:
Re: ARQ eliminates duplicates during unionDefaultGraph?
On 19/06/12 14:32, Simon Helsen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I recently ran into a query which produced a
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
> > What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
>
> I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called
> "linked data", "web of data" of anything that does n
Note that in this mail you forwarded mails from a private list to a
public list. You need to be more careful.
No damage done - the only reason this is private is that it's a PR
related activity and thus pre-announcement is bad. The open discussion
you are kick-starting should certainly be encourag
Alexander Dutton created JENA-265:
-
Summary: BINDINGS being parsed as BIND, leading to "unexpected …"
error
Key: JENA-265
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-265
Project: Apache Jena
Keith Alexander created JENA-264:
Summary: Fuseki SPARQL endpoint doesn't understand Content-type:
application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=utf-8
Key: JENA-264
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-264
On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:31, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
>> What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
>
> I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called
> "linked data", "web of data" of anything that does not includ
well, it will be submitted at the "Semantic Web" track... I think that covers
the
*semantic* part enough...
+1 for "linked web of data"
Best,
Sebastian
On 20.06.2012, at 12:08, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:31, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, R
2012/6/20 Nick Kew :
>
> On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:31, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
>>> What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
>>
>> I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called
>> "linked data", "web of data" of
2012/6/20 Bertrand Delacretaz
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
> wrote:
> > What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
>
+1, it sounds very good Reto.
>
> I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called
> "linked data", "web of data" of anything that d
But I like the idea and happy to participate the effort.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
> What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ross Gardler
> Date: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:22 PM
> Subject:
just semantics Bertrand ...
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
>> What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
>
> I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called
> "linked data", "web of data
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
> What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
I like the idea, and would like it even better if it was called
"linked data", "web of data" of anything that does not include the
word "semantic".
-Bertrand (with my marketing hat on ;-)
What about a semantic web track at ApacheCon?
Cheers,
Reto
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Gardler
Date: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:22 PM
Subject: Fwd: Tracks for ApacheCon Europe - Project Proposals needed
To: ooo-priv...@incubator.apache.org, airavata-priv...@incubator.apache.o
Thanks Andy. By re-ordering actions and the transactions in my code,
I've resolved the root problem.
I know you said you're hoping to remove this restriction on models and
transactions at some point via view graphs, but in the meantime would it
be worth adding more diagnostic info to the "** u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13397329#comment-13397329
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-261:
Reported to SPARQL-WG:
http://lists.w3.org/Archive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-263.
Resolution: Not A Problem
The problem is that you are getting the model reference outside the first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne closed JENA-263.
--
> Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '***
> UNEXPECTED'
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-263:
--
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Adding resource property inside TDB transaction causes message '***
39 matches
Mail list logo
