[jira] [Commented] (JENA-281) Turtle parser does not support spaces in URI references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13418976#comment-13418976 ] Piotr Hołubowicz commented on JENA-281: --- Thanks for the clarification. I was referring

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-281) Turtle parser does not support spaces in URI references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13419017#comment-13419017 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-281: You are more than welcome to submit a patch for

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-281) Turtle parser does not support spaces in URI references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13419022#comment-13419022 ] Piotr Hołubowicz commented on JENA-281: --- Makes sense, thanks. Should I need to modify

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-256) Significant performance regression (TDB?) on 2.7.1 RC compared to May 15 build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13419024#comment-13419024 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-256: You can have separate non-nested transactions by

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-279) Make node cache configurable and use soft references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13419026#comment-13419026 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-279: If we keep the cache, the use of soft references

NodeCache : keep or remove?

In JENA-279, the issue of whether the NodeCache serves any useful purpose these days has come up. Proposal: Remove the node cache Proposal: Remove the triple cache Node cache: There are two reasons for the cache: time saving (object creation costs) and space saving (reuse nodes). I'm not

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-284) Support for cygwin in apache-jena scripts.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne updated JENA-284: --- Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) Summary: Support for cygwin in apache-jena scripts. (was:

Node futures

Here are some thoughts on Jena3-timeframe changes - we have the opportunity to make changes and while we can't change too much without going into a black hole, a few key changes can be done. == Node Hierarchy At the moment, every node has an Object label in Node itself and it keys the cache,

Re: NodeCache : keep or remove?

+1 on removal of both the node and triple caches. In addition to the reasons already discussed, there is also the fact that Node.create() uses a global lock, which is going to be really bad for concurrency! Triple.create() doesn't do any locking, which appears to work out OK in this specific

Re: NodeCache : keep or remove?

Additionally, a fun thing to look at for Node would be to have a static cache pre-populated with commonly used resources (RDF, RDFS, OWL, etc.), similar to Java's Integer.valueOf(int) method. That could be useful. -Stephen On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Stephen Allen sal...@apache.org wrote: