Hi Paul,
On 09/01/17 20:23, Paul Houle wrote:
In vanilla RDF, you do not change 5 to 10, you either delete the 5 and
add the 10 or you add the 10 then delete the five! Maybe it all happens
in a transaction which might make the immediate states invisible to the
outside world.
I use the Jena R
In vanilla RDF, you do not change 5 to 10, you either delete the 5 and
add the 10 or you add the 10 then delete the five! Maybe it all happens
in a transaction which might make the immediate states invisible to the
outside world.
I use the Jena Rules engine with user defined functions that crea
Hi Claude,
On 09/01/17 10:55, Claude Warren wrote:
I am digging into reasoners for the first time in a long time and have a
couple of questions.
What I am trying to do is the following:
Assume data:
5
I want a rule that will produce
5
So something like:
(?x my:sameValue ?y) (?y
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
This looks nice now. ð Please do either file a ticket for the new bug
you found or find a ticket that already describes it (if there is one) and
reference it in the comment you left in the test case w
Greetings,
Given that the Cassandra server can host multiple client and those
clients can open the same graph on the server simultaneously. Basically
two updatable synchronized views on one data set.
Assume graph A is opened on client X and client Y and applications at X and
Y both register li
> Oh, that's fine. It shows as code that was added by this PR, strangely.
oops, good point: it’s a duplicate of the actual class, that is somewhere else
(something wrong with my local repo). My bad, I check and remove it.
> Le 9 janv. 2017 à 19:36, ajs6f a écrit :
>
> Github user ajs6f commen
Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203#discussion_r95217067
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/out/JenaRDF2JSONLD.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A
Github user fpservant commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203#discussion_r95216878
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/out/JenaRDF2JSONLD.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203#discussion_r95210926
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/out/JenaRDF2JSONLD.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/202
@afs Are you cool with this now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
the proposal to use a parse method allows to change current code from:
```
ReaderRIOT reader = RDFDataMgr.createReader(Lang.JSONLD);
try (InputStream in = new
ByteArrayInputStream(jsonld.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8))) {
reader.read(in, null, null,
StreamRDFLib.dat
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
You're saying use `org.apache.jena.riot.RDFDataMgr.parse(StreamRDF,
InputStream, String, Lang, Context)`? That does make sense. I guess I was
thinking of the general need to customize parsing behavior, b
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
What about a `parse` method?
As discussed before, adding a lot extra functions just for one particular
case of one particular language, seems to create unclarity for the general
usage. The read(.
Github user fpservant commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203#discussion_r95170644
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/JsonLDReader.java ---
@@ -45,9 +45,20 @@
import org.apache.jena.riot.system.* ;
import or
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
@fpservant @afs Yes, exactly. Having a method on `RdfDataMgr` that takes
`InputStream` _and_ `Context` seems very natural.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user fpservant commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
@afs I think that @ajs6f refers to code:
```
InputStream in = new
ByteArrayInputStream(jsonld.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8));
+Dataset ds = DatasetFactory.create();
+
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
With the changes that have happened, I'm not seeing the comment to which
you refer.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
@fpservant Oh my goodness, you are quite right. There is no appropriate
method in `RdfDataMgr`! @afs I think we could reasonably add such a method as
part of this PR-- it would clearly be useful. What sa
Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203#discussion_r95154891
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/JsonLDReader.java ---
@@ -45,9 +45,20 @@
import org.apache.jena.riot.system.* ;
import org.apac
I am digging into reasoners for the first time in a long time and have a
couple of questions.
What I am trying to do is the following:
Assume data:
5
I want a rule that will produce
5
but in addition if I change [ 5] to [ 10] I
want the reasoner to change [ 5] to [ 10]
So after fi
20 matches
Mail list logo