[GitHub] jena issue #209: Close writers in NTtriple

2017-02-09 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/209 Perhaps you could open an ordinary Jira issue with sample data and code? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do

[GitHub] jena issue #209: Close writers in NTtriple

2017-02-09 Thread rafaelcoutinho
Github user rafaelcoutinho commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/209 I know there is no query context or model, however one thing that I identified is that using different jena versions the executing time changes a lot. I don't think it's the query itself but it

[GitHub] jena pull request #209: Close writers in NTtriple

2017-02-09 Thread rafaelcoutinho
GitHub user rafaelcoutinho reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/209 Close writers in NTtriple Not sure why writers are not being closed in the Ntriple RDFWriter. I believe this is a good practice and (still under investigation) I suspect this is caus

[GitHub] jena pull request #209: Close writers in NTtriple

2017-02-09 Thread rafaelcoutinho
Github user rafaelcoutinho closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/209 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-732) Default generation target for schemagen maven plugin needs a dir

2017-02-09 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859542#comment-15859542 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-732: - Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: ht

[GitHub] jena issue #37: JENA-732 jena-maven-tools outputs to target/generated-source...

2017-02-09 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/37 Given that #38 is merged, is this still live? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature ena

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-909) Create Docker launcher for Fuseki

2017-02-09 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859539#comment-15859539 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-909: - Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: ht

[GitHub] jena issue #50: JENA-909 - Docker image for Fuseki 2

2017-02-09 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/50 @stain @kinow Were we able to get testing of some kind done? I can see real utility for a Docker image, because it would let a wider audience try out Fuseki more easily, and for some people, would give th

[GitHub] jena issue #114: JENA-632: Generate JSON from SPARQL directly

2017-02-09 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/114 @kinow is this still live? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-632) Generate JSON from SPARQL directly.

2017-02-09 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859534#comment-15859534 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-632: - Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: ht

[GitHub] jena pull request #214: Small changes

2017-02-09 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/214 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1277) Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases

2017-02-09 Thread samur araujo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859533#comment-15859533 ] samur araujo commented on JENA-1277: Dear Osma, I did not find the time yet to check it

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-1277) Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne closed JENA-1277. --- > Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases > - > >

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1288) Reduce dependency on the Xerces jar.

2017-02-09 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859512#comment-15859512 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1288: -- GitHub user afs opened a pull request: ht

[GitHub] jena pull request #216: JENA-1288: Remove use of Xerces when alternatives ex...

2017-02-09 Thread afs
GitHub user afs opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/216 JENA-1288: Remove use of Xerces when alternatives exist. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/afs/jena clean-xerces Alternatively you can

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-1148) TransformFilterEquality incorrectly eliminates some optionals

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne closed JENA-1148. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Andy Seaborne Fix Version/s: Jena 3.1.0 (missed in previous

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1277) Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases

2017-02-09 Thread Osma Suominen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Osma Suominen resolved JENA-1277. - Resolution: Fixed Right. I was hoping for the original reporter to confirm the fix, but he hasn't

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-1277) Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases

2017-02-09 Thread Osma Suominen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Osma Suominen updated JENA-1277: Fix Version/s: Jena 3.2.0 > Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases > -

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-1223) Provide transaction promotion

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne closed JENA-1223. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 3.1.1 > Provide transaction promotion > --

[jira] [Assigned] (JENA-1223) Provide transaction promotion

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-1223: --- Assignee: Andy Seaborne > Provide transaction promotion > - > >

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1277) Spatial Queries Very Slow For Large Databases

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859495#comment-15859495 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1277: - This has just be released in Jena 3.2.0 - can we

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1284) Improve GraphUtil operations by considering relative graph sizes.

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1284. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 3.3.0 > Improve GraphUtil operations by considering re

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1287) JSON improvements

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1287. - Resolution: Fixed > JSON improvements > - > > Key: JENA-1287 >

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1285) Have on Tokenizer token for strings.

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1285. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 3.3.0 > Have on Tokenizer token for strings. > ---

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-1037) jena-osgi

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1037: Description: I'm trying to create a simple interface/impl that will generate Prov-O RDF and place it

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1288) Reduce dependency on the Xerces jar.

2017-02-09 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1288: --- Summary: Reduce dependency on the Xerces jar. Key: JENA-1288 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1288 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type: Task Aff