[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1452) Special case GraphUnionRead for one graph.

2017-12-20 Thread Adam Jacobs (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16299446#comment-16299446 ] Adam Jacobs commented on JENA-1452: --- It looks like {{TestGraphUnionRead}} only covers the {{find()}}

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1452) Special case GraphUnionRead for one graph.

2017-12-20 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16299255#comment-16299255 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1452: -- GitHub user afs opened a pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #332: JENA-1452: GraphUnionRead; Union of one.

2017-12-20 Thread afs
GitHub user afs opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/332 JENA-1452: GraphUnionRead; Union of one. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/afs/jena union-of-one Alternatively you can review and

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1452) Special case GraphUnionRead for one graph.

2017-12-20 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1452: --- Summary: Special case GraphUnionRead for one graph. Key: JENA-1452 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1452 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type:

Re: consistent blank id values from RDFConnection

2017-12-20 Thread Claude Warren
My issue was not in the Fuseki results but in the RDFConnection side. Basically it remaps the results. However, it looks like your change will work there as well. I'll give it a try. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Claude, > > This commit (on my Jena