Possible fuseki/memory store bug

I've been trying to debug some weird behaviour in my test cases and think they are due to a bug in memory-backed fuseki stores. However, the behaviour is so odd and hard to reproduce I'd like some confirmation that someone else sees the same effect before opening a JIRA. # Steps to reproduce

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1495) Covariant return type for Model's PrefixMapping methods.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386949#comment-16386949 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1495: -- Github user jaco0646 commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #368: JENA-1495 Return Model from PrefixMapping methods.

Github user jaco0646 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/368#discussion_r172364101 --- Diff: jena-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/rdf/model/Model.java --- @@ -1051,4 +1051,12 @@ Remove all the statements matching (s, p, o) from this

[GitHub] jena pull request #367: JENA-1391: Add methods for ModelCollectors to API in...

GitHub user ajs6f reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/367 JENA-1391: Add methods for ModelCollectors to API in ModelUtils You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ajs6f/jena JENA-1391b

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1391) Add Convenience Methods to Dataset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386658#comment-16386658 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1391: -- GitHub user ajs6f reopened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1391) Add Convenience Methods to Dataset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386654#comment-16386654 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1391: -- Github user ajs6f closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] jena pull request #367: JENA-1391: Add methods for ModelCollectors to API in...

Github user ajs6f closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/367 ---

[GitHub] jena pull request #371: JENA-1498: Fuseki backup script

GitHub user afs opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/371 JENA-1498: Fuseki backup script You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/afs/jena fuseki-backup-script Alternatively you can review and apply

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1498) Provide an example Fuseki backup script.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386545#comment-16386545 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1498: -- Github user afs commented on the issue:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1498) Provide an example Fuseki backup script.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386544#comment-16386544 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1498: -- GitHub user afs opened a pull request:

[GitHub] jena issue #371: JENA-1498: Fuseki backup script

Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/371 Git has decided this is a rename when it is actually a delete/new file. ---

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1498) Provide an example Fuseki backup script.

Andy Seaborne created JENA-1498: --- Summary: Provide an example Fuseki backup script. Key: JENA-1498 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1498 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386445#comment-16386445 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172276168 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386444#comment-16386444 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172275879 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386431#comment-16386431 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172272325 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386428#comment-16386428 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172271582 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386356#comment-16386356 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172252346 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172254605 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386359#comment-16386359 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386358#comment-16386358 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386354#comment-16386354 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386357#comment-16386357 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172251788 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172254303 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386360#comment-16386360 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datas...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369#discussion_r172252112 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/TxnDataset2Graph.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[GitHub] jena issue #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datasets

Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369 Okay. `::wrap` vs. `::create` is not what I am referring to as reformatting. It's stuff like [this](https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369/files#diff-27cb8b74e951d2872a91a48066930e2d) or

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386317#comment-16386317 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user afs commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datasets

Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369 Yes, this is models passing down transactions. It only became possible with dataset-transaction promotion (new to 3.7.0). This all has a lot of knock on consequences. The wrap/create

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1495) Covariant return type for Model's PrefixMapping methods.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386290#comment-16386290 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1495: -- Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #368: JENA-1495 Return Model from PrefixMapping methods.

Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/368 This looks basically good to me: with an additional commit addressing https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/368#pullrequestreview-101006841, I'll be happy to merge this. ---

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1492) Transactions not passed down for nested models.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386286#comment-16386286 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1492: -- Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:

[GitHub] jena issue #369: JENA-1492: Pass down transactions from general datasets

Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/369 There is some new `Assembler` stuff and reformatting, so I'm not totally clear what the thrust of this PR is: is it to ensure that `Model`s wrapping other `Model`s (e.g. for inferencing) correctly pass

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Vesse resolved JENA-1497. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 3.7.0 Fixed for the 3.7.0 release >

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386160#comment-16386160 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1497: -- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] jena pull request #370: Fix delimiter parsing logic (JENA-1497)

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/370 ---

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386159#comment-16386159 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1497: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386157#comment-16386157 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1497: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16386158#comment-16386158 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1497: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16385908#comment-16385908 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1497: -- GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #370: Fix delimiter parsing logic (JENA-1497)

GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/370 Fix delimiter parsing logic (JENA-1497) Logical flaws in using continue vs break inside inner loops where causing the wrong delimiter positions to be detected and leading to false positives

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16385897#comment-16385897 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-1497: - Basic problem is use of {{continue}} vs {{break}} in the parsing logic,

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1497) ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly

Rob Vesse created JENA-1497: --- Summary: ParameterizedSparqlString detects delimiters incorrectly Key: JENA-1497 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1497 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type: