OK. I finally had a few minutes to look at this code.
I agree that supporting OWL2 would be nice.
There seems to be a lot here. (I have not read through it all and
therefore do not have a full understanding of the contribution) I too am
concerned about having enough developers that understand t
>> PMC and community - your thoughts.
> Not sure what does it mean, but it doesn't look like important.
I apologize, just misunderstood this.
Well, If the PMC and community decide that this feature is good to be
included as a Jena part, then, I think, the discussion can be moved to
Jira.
It is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1773:
Description:
Report on [users@jena (23/Oct)
|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c36df32ebfa08d868
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1773:
Description:
Report on [users@jena (23/Oct)
|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c36df32ebfa08d868
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1773:
Attachment: Q-prefix.rq
D-prefix.ttl
> TDB2: Duplicate prefixes in the data+query ca
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1773:
---
Summary: TDB2: Duplicate prefixes in the data+query cause warning
and exception in CONSTRUCT query.
Key: JENA-1773
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1773
