Re: 2.7.4 release?

2012-09-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 06/09/12 21:28, Simon Helsen wrote: hi everyone, I was wondering if there is a chance to get a 2.7.4 release soon. There have been numerous fixes since 2.7.3 and unfortunately, we are not allowed to adopt a non-released snapshot. Basic internal testing seems to suggest 2.7.4 is pretty

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-189) Jena 3 / technical

2012-09-12 Thread Rajeev B (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13453972#comment-13453972 ] Rajeev B commented on JENA-189: --- I'll read through and try to proceed in the direction of an

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-244) Deadlock during SPARQL execution on an inference model

2012-09-12 Thread Simon Helsen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13453983#comment-13453983 ] Simon Helsen commented on JENA-244: --- Have you tested this with a snapshot 2.7.4 build?

Re: 2.7.4 release?

2012-09-12 Thread Simon Helsen
Thanks Andy The changes (post TDB 0.9.3) for optimized and correct transactions are new and really could do with bedding down. If you could go beyond basic testing that would be helpful so things get raised before a .4 release. we are in the process of getting more comprehensive tests done,

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-320) Unexpected result from SPARQL Tutorial - Filters

2012-09-12 Thread Don Pellegrino (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13454072#comment-13454072 ] Don Pellegrino commented on JENA-320: - Thanks, it is now working as expected.

Re: 2.7.4 release?

2012-09-12 Thread Simon Helsen
Well, we had two timescales in mind: Either very quick, i.e. sometime next week :-) That would give our verification testers enough time to get decent coverage before release and would just be sufficient to get legal aspects out of the way. I realize that would have been ambitious either way,

Spatial Indexing library for GeoSPARQL

2012-09-12 Thread Rob Vesse
I remember some discussions a while back about one of the barriers to implementing GeoSPARQL in Jena being the lack of a good indexing library to use I notice that Lucene 4.0 has a new Spatial module - http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/spatial/index.html – which is itself built on

Re: Spatial Indexing library for GeoSPARQL

2012-09-12 Thread Marco Neumann
I would say yes the interesting bits are done by JTS. we used another LGPL index for geosparql.org. I think Jena deserves a dedicated file based indexer to support the full OGC geosparql standard but that said the task should not be underestimated. On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Rob Vesse