[jira] [Commented] (JENA-927) Add transition support to ja:loadClass loading.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528317#comment-14528317 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-927: If this is intended as transitional support should this not

[GitHub] jena pull request: Lucene index synchro on triple deletion (jena-t...

Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-99072949 Ah, I see. But this still doesn't help for cases where there are small differences between literals within the same language, for example singular/plural forms that get

[GitHub] jena pull request: Lucene index synchro on triple deletion (jena-t...

Github user osma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-99066248 There was a discussion thread around this topic on the Jena dev mailing list in late February, starting with this message:

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-933) DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Vesse closed JENA-933. -- Resolution: Fixed DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

[GitHub] jena pull request: Lucene index synchro on triple deletion (jena-t...

Github user osma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-99062926 Multilingual index manages dynamically one index per language. Hence for the case where we have two same literals with different languages, they will be not stored into the

Re: [GitHub] jena pull request: Lucene index synchro on triple deletion (jena-t...

On 05/05/15 16:54, Chris Dollin wrote: Aside, hope it's useful: Note that current jena-text doesn't /do/ conjunctive query but has enough hooks to /enable/ conjunctive query, as is done in our ppd-index code at https://github.com/epimorphics/ppd-text-index in TextDocProducerBatch. When it

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-933) DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528529#comment-14528529 ] Sebb commented on JENA-933: --- Thanks for the very prompt attention to this. DOAP needs to provide

[GitHub] jena pull request: Jena base to java8

Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/56#issuecomment-99121831 Okay, I'll plug `NodeTransform` back in at oaj.sparql.graph, since that is where it was: minimal disruption. I've got the JavaDocs square and re-separated the two

[GitHub] jena pull request: Jena base to java8

Github user afs commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/56#issuecomment-99120861 The vast majority of the PR looks good including converting code in passing. MultiMap?mulitSet are unlikely to have leaked (and can be restored if need be); I've already

[GitHub] jena pull request: Jena base to java8

Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/56#issuecomment-99085428 I'm definitely up for breaking this down. :) The major moves here are: - I replaced any interface inside oaj.atlas for which I could find a

[GitHub] jena pull request: Jena base to java8

Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/56#issuecomment-99100248 Actually, for `NodeTransform`, perhaps it could be even more tightly scoped to just `org.apache.jena.sparql.algebra.optimize`? --- If your project is set up for it, you can

Re: [GitHub] jena pull request: Lucene index synchro on triple deletion (jena-t...

On 05/05/2015 02:04 PM, amiara514 wrote: Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-99072949 Ah, I see. But this still doesn't help for cases where there are small differences between literals within the same language,

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-931) Shift org.apache.jena.atlas in jena-base onto Java 8 types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528468#comment-14528468 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-931: - Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request: Lucene index synchro on triple deletion (jena-t...

Github user osma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-99096043 [copying from the email I sent to the dev list, apparently the bot didn't notice my message] Thanks a lot Chris, this was indeed very useful! So you're already doing

Re: Java 8 Streams Was: What can be removed/simplified ?

I think StreamXXX is the future but there is so much goodness in the functional approach that a fluent API build to work well with that paradigm ought to work well out of other paradigms. The other day I was coding up something that parses record-organized .txt files and make triples and I'd

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne updated JENA-934: --- Description: See test3 in

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne updated JENA-934: --- Environment: (was: See test3 in

[GitHub] jena pull request: Jena base to java8

Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/56#issuecomment-99141455 `NodeTransform` is back-- I think that's all the emendation we wanted, yes? Did you have thoughts about dividing out this large PR? --- If your project is set up

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528850#comment-14528850 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-934: jsonld-java accpts and correctly handles as a

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne closed JENA-934. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.0 JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix

[jira] [Assigned] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-934: -- Assignee: Andy Seaborne JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-933) DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528342#comment-14528342 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-933: Updated DOAP has now been published DOAP needs to provide

Re: Re-enable test in testGetDeductionsModel0 TestOntModel

On 04/05/15 11:40, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: Hi all, I had spotted three tests that looked a bit strange while working on the JENA-380 and made a note to look at them later after the jena3 merge. I've committed two of them TestOneToManyMap#testConstruct1 (sorry, used the wrong commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528866#comment-14528866 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-934: -- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528871#comment-14528871 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-934: -- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-933) DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528195#comment-14528195 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-933: -- Commit 1677763

[jira] [Reopened] (JENA-933) DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb reopened JENA-933: --- Thanks for fixing the file in SVN. However the projects website is built from the file

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-933) DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Vesse closed JENA-933. -- DOAP needs to provide asfext:id value for implements/Standard

Re: [ANN] GSoC 2015 Accepts a Student Project for Jena

On 28/04/15 13:09, Ying Jiang wrote: Hi all, FYI, Google announced the accepted projects of GSoC 2015 yesterday. A Jena project of Extend CONSTRUCT to build quads (JENA-491) [1] is among them. Cheers, Ying Jiang [1]

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-189) Jena 3 / technical

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-189. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.0 Jena 3 has now started so we move to specific JIRA

Re: Java 8 Streams Was: What can be removed/simplified ?

Hi there, I've noticed a few more places where some Java 8 changes could be brought into play in the interest of simplification, and in particular, the use of Java 8 Streams seems like a nice way to go. It would let Jena cut out a fair bit of API and implementation code in favor of letting Java

[jira] [Created] (JENA-934) JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used

Andy Seaborne created JENA-934: -- Summary: JSONLD writer can output illegal JSON-LD when prefix used Key: JENA-934 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934 Project: Apache Jena