GitHub user ajs6f opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/79
JENA-966: Eliminating some unnecessary iterator types
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ajs6f/jena JENA-966
Alternatively you can
hmmm Looking at the code..
The only unusual thing that the contract test does is build a class path
that is then used to find the classes that are under test.
I noticed in the Linux case it also failed the contract code. The issue
was that it could not find the dependency in any of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590328#comment-14590328
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-969:
-
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590304#comment-14590304
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-966:
-
GitHub user ajs6f opened a pull request:
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/78#issuecomment-112912669
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-969
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
A. Soroka created JENA-969:
--
Summary: Problem with SelectBuilderTest after change to rdf:type
serialization
Key: JENA-969
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-969
Project: Apache Jena
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590306#comment-14590306
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
The PR above actually removes the types in question. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590674#comment-14590674
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-966:
{{NiceIterator}} now uses {{Iter.map}} via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590751#comment-14590751
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-969:
--
Commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/78
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590762#comment-14590762
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-968:
Possible. The code has always used rdf:type when an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590522#comment-14590522
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-966 at 6/17/15 8:32 PM:
-
I
GitHub user ajs6f opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/78
Fix jena-querybuilder test
The change to how rdf:type is serialized seems to have zonked a test in
`jena-querybuilder`.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590523#comment-14590523
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-966:
I agree - delete it.
LazyIterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590522#comment-14590522
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-966:
I don't think that is a good idea.
LazyIterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590530#comment-14590530
]
A. Soroka edited comment on JENA-966 at 6/17/15 8:35 PM:
-
Re:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590530#comment-14590530
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
Re: `Map1Iterator`, I didn't connect it to `Iter::map`, I
Github user afs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/6570c25be8c6e958a5647a7d2c1e23466498b332#commitcomment-11733865
I only ran mvn -Pdev locally. As per comment on the PR - the test code
should be robust to either correct form being produced.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590570#comment-14590570
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-966:
Why is iterator refactoring important?
(and Java8
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user afs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-112947756
PR merged. Many thanks for working on this.
Please could we have some documentation for the feature?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-967:
---
Description:
There are situations where it would be useful to be able to format strings
bound to
Stuart Williams created JENA-967:
Summary: Suggested ARQ Extension function: afn:printf(...)
Key: JENA-967
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-967
Project: Apache Jena
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14589458#comment-14589458
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-966:
There are no uses of this class in the codebase
I wanted to use it in an application. Is there a replacement?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Andy Seaborne (JIRA) j...@apache.org
wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-963:
---
Attachment: Jena963_OpAsQuery.java
Examples of all the group-by translations needed.
OpAsQuery does
On 17/06/15 10:07, Claude Warren wrote:
I wanted to use it in an application. Is there a replacement?
I just found IteratorDelayedInitialization in jena-base.
What also springs to mind is looking at the iterators in Commons. They
added forms at your suggestion of looking at jena-core
I think there are interesting iterators in Commons Collections and some utility
code in Commons Functor (unreleased) too.
HTH
Bruno
From: Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (JENA-966) LazyIterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14589519#comment-14589519
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-963:
These are the different cases:
_Case 1_
{noformat}
Correlation is not causality ... but!
Claude,
The Windows job stopped working last time around the time the version of
the contract code was updated.
Last time, I wiped the workspace out which seemed to get it working
again - I don't know what's going on why. The maven output does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14589519#comment-14589519
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-963 at 6/17/15 9:30 AM:
-
How about using a Java 8 SupplierIteratorT? That's pretty lazy.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
On Jun 17, 2015, at 5:07 AM, Claude Warren cla...@xenei.com wrote:
I wanted to use it in an application. Is there a replacement?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Andy Seaborne
Andy Seaborne created JENA-968:
--
Summary: SPARQL printing : use a not full uri for rdf:type.
Key: JENA-968
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-968
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type:
On 17/06/15 00:18, Holger Knublauch wrote:
On 6/16/2015 22:03, Osma Suominen wrote:
Here's a slightly relevant discussion about how to support something
like pre-bound variables / parametrized queries in YASQE, a graphical
SPARQL editor component in the YASGUI suite (and used by Fuseki among
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/77#issuecomment-112795366
Sorry, @afs, when you say Moving into jena-base is probably the best first
step. are you referring to `ArqCmdGeneral`/`CmdGeneral`?
---
If your project is set up for it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14589793#comment-14589793
]
Osma Suominen commented on JENA-968:
Um, why not just unconditionally use {{a}}?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14589815#comment-14589815
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-968:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-968.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.0
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
SPARQL printing
Andrew,
I may have something running and illustrating something. It is not
quite as simple as changing modelFolderDir - ont-policy.rdf has E:/
references, and your description has file:/C:tmp/. I still intermittent
404s where the ont-policy isn't being applied.
I'm not seeing what you see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590002#comment-14590002
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
There is also {{LateBindingIterator}} which is only used by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590012#comment-14590012
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
I think it could be argued that {{Map1Iterator}} should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590036#comment-14590036
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
{{SingletonIterator}} could be plausibly be deprecated in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14590038#comment-14590038
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
{{UniqueExtendedIterator}} is not used anywhere, and even
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/77#issuecomment-112862578
Okay, I've got `ModVersion` out to `jena-base` and moved `Version` into it
as an inner class (since `ModVersion` is the only client of `Version`). We are
still doing the the
44 matches
Mail list logo
