afs merged pull request #67:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/67
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
afs merged pull request #65:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/65
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
afs merged pull request #63:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/63
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
afs commented on pull request #67:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/67#issuecomment-920826331
@michaelwechner - thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
The vote passes with 3 +1 votes from Bruno, Aaron and Andy, together
with a community vote from Marco.
I'll start pushing the release out.
Note - this is without the OSGi binary artifacts due to problems with
the new dependencies for JSON-LD 1.1 support discovered during the
release process.
Hi Marco,
Thanks for the vote!
Andy
On 15/09/2021 14:52, Marco Neumann wrote:
build with Apache Maven 3.6.3 and tested with Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
and openjdk version "13.0.7" 2021-04-20
with a focus on the geosparql module and standalone server
jena-fuseki-geosparql-4.2.0 functionality
[x]
And to add to the OSGi situation, this just appeared:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69180521/karaf-unable-to-install-jena
So some system is using Jena with OSGi - not clear whether it is Jena
OSGi binary artifacts or not.
It's not going to be a quick thing to decide what to do.
