[VOTE] (RC1a) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

Hi, Here is a vote on the release of Jena 2.13.0. This is the second vote call on the first release candidate. This call adds the checksums for the dist/ items omitted in the first VOTE call. Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. We need at least a majority and 3 +1's

Re: [VOTE] [CANCEL] (RC1) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

VOTE cancelled due to lack of checksums.

Re: [VOTE] (RC1) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

+ are the checksums correct? Bother. I'll cancel the vote and restart it. The checksums should be included, well, at least the source-release one. Andy You didn't say what is the hash of the source-release.zip, so I have assumed the below: sha1:

Re: [VOTE] (RC1a) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... +1 Andy

Re: [VOTE] (RC1) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

On 09/03/15 10:39, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: -1: Release notes not updated. Everything else fine. Thank you for the checking. WARNING: Release notes are missing for 2.13.0 source/jena-2.13.0/jena-core/ReleaseNotes.txt binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0/ReleaseNotes-Jena.txt does NOT mention

Re: [VOTE] (RC1) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

On 9 Mar 2015 12:10, Andy Seaborne Could you explain why that is a -1, not 0 or even a conditional +1? Release notes are useful to some people but it does not affect the question of whether the release process has been executed correctly. I was not sure of the practise here, and would have

Re: [VOTE] (RC1a) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

+1 ..conditional on future retirement of ReleaseNotes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-896 This vote supersedes http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201503.mbox/%3CCAMBJEmWfFmVmr6o9d-nogSWK50YcdFO741g4ngvKiNDYenoDTg%40mail.gmail.com%3E On 9 March 2015 at 13:43, Andy

[jira] [Created] (JENA-896) Remove ReleaseNotes.txt from releases

Stian Soiland-Reyes created JENA-896: Summary: Remove ReleaseNotes.txt from releases Key: JENA-896 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-896 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] (RC1a) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

Now also tested on Windows 8.0 x64 with java 8u40 and Maven 3.2.5 Fuseki 2 binary works well with TDB, load, query, backup and restore, data survives restart after ctrl-c. http://localhost:3030/manage.html#new-dataset does not work in Internet Explorer 10 unless you click the Enable intranet

[jira] [Created] (JENA-897) jena-jdbc-tdb tests use %TEMP% instead of target/

Stian Soiland-Reyes created JENA-897: Summary: jena-jdbc-tdb tests use %TEMP% instead of target/ Key: JENA-897 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-897 Project: Apache Jena

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-897) jena-jdbc-tdb tests use %TEMP% instead of target/

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stian Soiland-Reyes updated JENA-897: - Environment: Windowx 8.0 x64, C: with 34 GB free (was: Windowx x64, C: with 34 GB free)

Re: [VOTE] (RC1) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

-1: Release notes not updated. Everything else fine. WARNING: Release notes are missing for 2.13.0 source/jena-2.13.0/jena-core/ReleaseNotes.txt binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0/ReleaseNotes-Jena.txt does NOT mention 2.12.1 or 2.13.0 + are the checksums correct? You didn't say what is the hash

Re: GSoC 2015 - who's considering mentoring?

Looking through the proposed projects (label: gsoc2015) : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-664?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2015 I could perhaps mentor JENA-647 SPARQL template queries On 7 March 2015 at 18:05, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: GSoC 2015

Re: [VOTE] (RC1a) Release Jena 2.13.0, with Fuseki 1.1.2 and Fuseki 2.0.0

+1 not binding. Build works fine for the zipped archive and for the git commit in the following environment, running `mvn clean install`. Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1; 2014-12-14T15:29:23-02:00) Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.2.5 Java version: 1.8.0_40,

How does Jena-ARQ execute the queries containing ORDER BY + LIMIT clause

Hi, I saw the following issue posted on Jena website (which has been recently resolved): Avoid a total sort for ORDER BY + LIMIT queries (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-89). I am very interested in understanding as to how does Jena-ARQ avoids total sort for ORDER BY + LIMIT queries.

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-897) jena-jdbc-tdb tests use %TEMP% instead of target/

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14354030#comment-14354030 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-897: - GitHub user stain opened a pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request: JENA-897 Override java.io.tmpdir to write to ta...

GitHub user stain opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/41 JENA-897 Override java.io.tmpdir to write to target/ .. instead of /tmp or %TEMP% Fixes JENA-897 (although it still needs 35 GB of disk space on Windows) You can merge this pull request into a

Re: GSoC 2015 - who's considering mentoring?

Possibly, I keep wanting to do this each year but circumstances keep getting in my way. The summer months are unfortunately likely to be crunch time in my group at Cray so it would have to be really the right project for me to be able to find time to mentor it Rob On 07/03/2015 18:05, Andy