[GitHub] jena issue #114: JENA-632: Generate JSON from SPARQL directly

Github user kinow commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/114 Hey @ajs6f , I think so. My weak memory seems to tell me that the last time I did that... shortly after, there was some work on JSON (JSON-LD? Or maybe pure JSON) somewhere else in Jena; and when I saw

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-632) Generate JSON from SPARQL directly.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16390616#comment-16390616 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-632: - Github user kinow commented on the issue:

Re: Possible fuseki/memory store bug

On 07/03/18 17:23, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 07/03/18 16:51, Dave Reynolds wrote: On 07/03/18 16:29, Andy Seaborne wrote: JENA-1499 may have knock on effects. Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name would be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in

Re: Possible fuseki/memory store bug

I've got a PR in now for 1499 (TIM remembers graph names even after they are empty): https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/374 Whether or not that's the whole story here, that's a different question! ajs6f > On Mar 7, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > > On

[jira] [Assigned] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] A. Soroka reassigned JENA-1499: --- Assignee: A. Soroka > The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads. >

[GitHub] jena pull request #374: JENA-1499: Pruning TIM indexes on tuple deletion

GitHub user ajs6f opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/374 JENA-1499: Pruning TIM indexes on tuple deletion You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ajs6f/jena JENA-1499 Alternatively you can review

Re: Possible fuseki/memory store bug

On 07/03/18 16:51, Dave Reynolds wrote: On 07/03/18 16:29, Andy Seaborne wrote: JENA-1499 may have knock on effects. Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name would be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in general. That might make a difference -

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16389790#comment-16389790 ] A. Soroka commented on JENA-1499: - No, no-- I just meant in TIM! I'll have a PR in later today to show what

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1499: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16389783#comment-16389783 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1499: - Currently, this ticket is now disconnected from the original

Re: Possible fuseki/memory store bug

On 07/03/18 16:29, Andy Seaborne wrote: JENA-1499 may have knock on effects. Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name would be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in general. That might make a difference - I haven't traced that part of the code.

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16389782#comment-16389782 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1499: - If by a check for empty set, you mean in the TIM code, then that

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16389764#comment-16389764 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1499: - This shows an inconsistency with {{dsg.containsGraph}}. This

Re: [jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

+1! ajs6f > On Mar 7, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Claude Warren wrote: > > This looks like a prime candidate for a contract test (as soon as we agree > on what the action should be) > > Claude > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:26 PM, A. Soroka (JIRA) wrote: > >> >>

Re: Possible fuseki/memory store bug

JENA-1499 may have knock on effects. Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name would be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in general. That might make a difference - I haven't traced that part of the code. As for the :3030, ":" is one of the nasty

Re: [jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

This looks like a prime candidate for a contract test (as soon as we agree on what the action should be) Claude On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:26 PM, A. Soroka (JIRA) wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page= >

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16389757#comment-16389757 ] A. Soroka commented on JENA-1499: - [~andy.seaborne],

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1499) The TIM dataset retains a memory of named graphs after deleting all quads.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16389708#comment-16389708 ] A. Soroka commented on JENA-1499: - So, I'm fairly sure why this is happening: all the indexes in TIM are of

Re: Possible fuseki/memory store bug

On 07/03/18 12:59, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 06/03/18 22:43, Dave Reynolds wrote: Hi Andy, Thanks for confirming you seeing something similar, glad I wasn't hallucinating! Not sure any more that I am :-| There are ghost graphs in a TIM dataset after deletion, JENA-1499, but I'm not seeing

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1454) Configurable ResultSet reading and writing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16389513#comment-16389513 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1454: -- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] jena pull request #373: JENA-1454: Fix to handle text output format.

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/373 ---

Re: Possible fuseki/memory store bug

On 06/03/18 22:43, Dave Reynolds wrote: Hi Andy, Thanks for confirming you seeing something similar, glad I wasn't hallucinating! Not sure any more that I am :-| There are ghost graphs in a TIM dataset after deletion, JENA-1499, but I'm not seeing an empty store and do see the added