Hi Imoto,
Thanks for considering, below are my comments.
On Tuesday, December 17, 2019, Takashi Imoto wrote:
> To: Rahul-san.
>
>
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
>
>
> > Why you are manually selecting the corealtion candidates? it should be
> automated.
>
>
>
> Auto correlation feature list up
Hi Imoto,
Please clear below points
On Thursday, December 12, 2019, Takashi Imoto wrote:
> To: Valdimir-san.
>
> > Does "Correlation" differ from "Auto-Correlation"? Should just one of
> them be
> > used in all the places? Is there a "manual correlation"?
>
> "Auto-Correlation" mean, list up
Hi Imoto,
Please clear below points
On Thursday, December 12, 2019, Takashi Imoto wrote:
> To: Valdimir-san.
>
> > Does "Correlation" differ from "Auto-Correlation"? Should just one of
> them be
> > used in all the places? Is there a "manual correlation"?
>
> "Auto-Correlation" mean, list up
19 4:16 AM
> To: Vladimir Sitnikov
> Cc: ApacheJMeter dev list ; necti_openiv_swe
>
> Subject: RE: [OpenIV:0551] Re: Bugzilla Enhancement: "Auto-Correlation as
> core functionality in JMeter"
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I have same understanding. I am u
Hi Vladimir,
I have same understanding. I am unable to understand that why extra jmx
file is used, it is not clear from the file as outcome.
Imoto,
Can we have better way rather than selecting correlation candidates
manually in table?
Auto-correlation should not involve manual steps and why
Greetings!
I am not part of this project to add auto-correlation to JMeter but here is
my take on it:
(Note: I use the words "script" and "test plan" interchangeably)
Correlation is the process of capturing the session-specific information
passed from server to client and back to server for
>About new feature of auto-correlation, we prepared specification written
as manual.
That is great. It really helps to preview the feature.
However, I fail to understand what is "correlation with JMX file".
I see it consumes an extra JMX file, but it is not clear what should be
there in the
inal Message-
> From: Rahul Mehta
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 3:22 AM
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Cc: necti_openiv_swe
> Subject: Re: [OpenIV:0551] Re: Bugzilla Enhancement: "Auto-Correlation as
> core functionality in JMeter"
>
> Hi Imoto,
>
>
feed back.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alexander Podelko
> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 2:43 AM
> > To: dev@jmeter.apache.org; Imoto Takashi(井元 崇之)
> >
> > Cc: necti_openiv_swe
> > Subject: Re: [OpenIV:0551] Re: Bug
9 2:43 AM
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org; Imoto Takashi(井元 崇之)
>
> Cc: necti_openiv_swe
> Subject: Re: [OpenIV:0551] Re: Bugzilla Enhancement: "Auto-Correlation as
> core functionality in JMeter"
>
> Completely agree. It would be a great benefit for the community and wi
Completely agree. It would be a great benefit for the community and will move
JMeter to the next level (from the enterprise point of view).
According to my experience, if rules are well defined, the script may be
correlated automatically (with rather few exceptions). But ability to rollback
To: Alexander-san.
Thank you for comment us.
It's a good suggestion, and we are considering this too.
> As I am working with same products again and again, I don't need to
> auto-correlate or record it twice
Yes, I have same experience.
I think most of correlation value like session or state,
12 matches
Mail list logo
